本文選題：體育賽事定價(jià) + 主體　； 參考：《首都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)》2017年02期

【摘要】：體育賽事定價(jià)問題的出現(xiàn)既表現(xiàn)出我國體育市場化的不成熟,又表現(xiàn)出我國體育市場法治建設(shè)的滯后。體育賽事定價(jià)的盈利性、獨(dú)斷性、肆意性超越了其應(yīng)有的社會性、參與性和合法性,造成關(guān)聯(lián)主體價(jià)格權(quán)利的保護(hù)失位,最終影響體育賽事經(jīng)營者和體育賽事本身的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。在經(jīng)濟(jì)民主和商談民主的語境下,體育賽事定價(jià)應(yīng)當(dāng)從話語、場域和規(guī)則的建設(shè)出發(fā),落腳于主體權(quán)利的實(shí)現(xiàn),在"權(quán)利-義務(wù)-責(zé)任"的框架內(nèi)尋求體育賽事價(jià)格活動的有序開展。經(jīng)營者、消費(fèi)者和政府在體育賽事定價(jià)商談中扮演了不同的角色,而消費(fèi)者權(quán)利應(yīng)當(dāng)成為定價(jià)商談的重中之重。通過公共領(lǐng)域代表制度和聽證制度,可以嘗試進(jìn)行制度擬制,促進(jìn)體育賽事定價(jià)領(lǐng)域的商談民主形成。
[Abstract]:The emergence of the pricing problem of sports events not only shows the immaturity of sports marketization in our country, but also shows the lag of the construction of rule of law in our country's sports market. The profitability, arbitrariness and arbitrariness of the pricing of sports events exceed its due social, participatory and legitimacy, resulting in the loss of the protection of the price rights of the related parties. Finally, it will affect the sustainable development of sports event operators and sports events themselves. In the context of economic democracy and negotiation democracy, the pricing of sports events should be based on the construction of discourse, field and rules, and should be based on the realization of the right of the subject. In the framework of "right-duty-responsibility" to seek the orderly development of the price activities of sports events. Operators, consumers and the government play a different role in the negotiation of the pricing of sports events, and consumer rights should be the top priority of the pricing negotiations. Through the public field representative system and the hearing system, we can try to establish the system and promote the democratic formation of negotiation in the field of sports event pricing.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué)體育部;
【基金】：2016重慶市教育委員人文社會科學(xué)一般項(xiàng)目(16SKGH009) 2016年西南政法大學(xué)資助(2016X22D-01)
【分類號】：G80-05
，

本文編號：2044997