第29屆與第30屆奧運會中國男籃進攻戰(zhàn)術運用分析
本文選題:第29、30屆奧運會 切入點:進攻戰(zhàn)術特征 出處:《北京體育大學》2015年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:本文主要采用文獻調(diào)查法與錄像觀察法等研究方法,以第29屆與第30屆奧運會中國隊進攻戰(zhàn)術特征為研究對象,通過對中國隊在第29屆與第30屆奧運會上的進攻戰(zhàn)術特征進行對比,深入的探討和思考中國隊在兩屆奧運會中的進攻戰(zhàn)術特征,總結(jié)并尋找中國隊競技水平下降的原因,同時根據(jù)實際情況給出參考建議,為中國隊今后的發(fā)展提供支持。通過對兩屆奧運會上的進攻戰(zhàn)術特征進行對比得出了以下的結(jié)論:1.第30屆奧運會中國隊快攻戰(zhàn)術的發(fā)動與接應區(qū)域較第29屆奧運會更為分散,推進方式與推進路線較第29屆奧運會更為集中,而在快攻結(jié)束階段形成人數(shù)相等或占優(yōu)情況明顯少于第29屆奧運會,創(chuàng)造直接上籃形成一對一進攻得分機會的能力不強,但是籃下強攻次數(shù)明顯多于第29屆奧運會,說明第29屆奧運會中國隊隊員發(fā)動快攻更加謹慎,而第30屆奧運會中國隊隊員對于快攻戰(zhàn)術的發(fā)動更為頻繁。2.第29屆奧運會中國隊搶攻戰(zhàn)術使用沒有第30屆奧運會頻繁,但成功率較高,搶攻戰(zhàn)術得分比低于第30屆奧運會。而第30屆奧運會中國隊在運用搶攻戰(zhàn)術時個人單打獨斗太多,內(nèi)線隊員參與搶攻戰(zhàn)術較多,但攻擊手段部以中遠投籃為主,缺少籃下強打,外線隊員攻擊效率不高,從而導致?lián)尮?zhàn)術的得分效率低于第29屆奧運會。3.從整體上來看中國隊在第29屆奧運會的陣地進攻戰(zhàn)術運用的成功率要高于第30屆奧運會。從個人進攻戰(zhàn)術上來看,中國隊在第29屆奧運會上的成功率要遠高于第30屆奧運會,第29屆奧運會個人進攻區(qū)域著重在籃下,而第30屆奧運會的個人進攻區(qū)域要分布于罰球線以下的籃筐左右兩側(cè)。從進攻基礎配合上來看,中國隊在第29屆奧運會上的使用次數(shù)要少于多于第30屆奧運會,在第29屆奧運會上中國隊的傳切配合與突分配合發(fā)動區(qū)域均分散于罰球線以上,而第30屆奧運會上中國隊的傳切配合與突分配合發(fā)動區(qū)域多為禁區(qū)弧頂處。在全隊整體進攻方面,中國隊在第29屆奧運會上的運用要多于第30屆奧運會;在第29屆奧運會上的中國隊陣地進攻更加強調(diào)全隊的整體配合,而在第30屆奧運會上中國隊的攻擊節(jié)奏更快,更加注重局部進攻基礎配合的運用。在常用戰(zhàn)術方面,第29屆奧運會上的中國隊在發(fā)動戰(zhàn)術時5號位隊員進攻靠近籃下,而4號位隊員時常拉到高位伺機進攻;而在第30屆奧運會上中國隊在發(fā)動戰(zhàn)術時,5號位與4號位距離籃筐的位置都比較遠,1號位持球的時間較長。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly adopts the methods of literature investigation and video observation, taking the attack tactical characteristics of the Chinese team in the 29th and 30th Olympic Games as the research objects. By comparing the offensive tactics of the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games and the 30th Olympic Games, the author deeply discusses and ponders the offensive tactical characteristics of the Chinese team in the two Olympic Games, sums up and finds out the reasons for the decline of the Chinese team's competitive level. At the same time, according to the actual situation, the reference suggestions are given. By comparing the characteristics of offensive tactics in the two Olympic Games, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. In the 30th Olympic Games, the launching and receiving regions of the Chinese fast break tactics are more dispersed than those of the 29th Olympic Games. The way and route of propulsion are more concentrated than those of the 29th Olympic Games, and the number of people forming at the end of fast break is obviously less than that of the 29th Olympic Games, and the ability to create direct layup to form one-to-one attack scoring opportunities is not strong. However, the number of strong attacks under the basket is obviously higher than that of the 29th Olympic Games, indicating that the Chinese team members of the 29th Olympic Games are more cautious in launching the fast break. However, the Chinese team members of the 30th Olympic Games started the fast-break tactics more frequently .2. the 29 th Olympic team used the grabbing tactics less frequently than the 30th Olympic Games, but the success rate was relatively high. The score of the attack tactics was lower than that of the 30th Olympic Games. In the 30th Olympic Games, the Chinese team had too many individual soloists in the use of the strategy of preemptive attack, and the members of the inside line participated in more tactics of the preemptive attack, but the attack means department mainly took the shots of Cosco and lacked the strong play under the basket. The perimeter team is not efficient enough to attack. As a result, the scoring efficiency of the attack strategy is lower than that of the 29th Olympic Games. On the whole, the success rate of the position offensive tactics used by the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games is higher than that of the 30th Olympic Games. From the perspective of individual offensive tactics, The success rate of the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games was much higher than that in the 30th Olympic Games, where the individual offensive areas of the 29th Olympic Games focused on the basket. The individual offensive areas of the 30th Olympic Games should be distributed on the left and right sides of the basket below the free throw line. From the point of view of the basic offensive cooperation, the Chinese team used fewer times in the 29th Olympic Games than in the 30th Olympic Games. At the 29th Olympic Games, the regions of the Chinese team's cross-cut cooperation and sudden scoring cooperation were scattered above the free throw line. In the 30th Olympic Games, most of the regions started by the Chinese team are the arc-top of the forbidden zone. In the whole attack of the whole team, the use of the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games is more than that in the 30th Olympic Games. In the 29th Olympic Games, the Chinese team put more emphasis on the overall cooperation of the whole team, while at the 30th Olympic Games, the Chinese team's attack rhythm was faster, and they paid more attention to the use of local offensive basic cooperation. In terms of common tactics, In the 29th Olympic Games, when the Chinese team launched tactics, the 5th member attacked near the basket, while the 4th member often pulled to the high position to wait for the attack; In the 30th Olympic Games, when the Chinese team started the tactics, position 5 and 4 were far away from the basket, and position 1 had a long time to hold the ball.
【學位授予單位】:北京體育大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:G841
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 陳京生;許慧;;第28屆奧運會中國男籃防守技戰(zhàn)術研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2006年02期
2 周武;毛偉民;;第28屆奧運會中國男籃與競賽對手的技術統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)比較研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2006年04期
3 姜明;王武年;;當前世界高水平男子籃球運動防守技術特征研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2006年04期
4 王衛(wèi)星;彭延春;;運動員體能與技戰(zhàn)術發(fā)揮的關系[J];北京體育大學學報;2007年03期
5 錢利民;;對中國男籃目前存在問題的分析研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2008年08期
6 范民運;趙志強;趙強偉;;第29屆奧運會中國男籃進攻能力的研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2008年11期
7 李學軍;王武年;易小堅;;當前世界男子籃球強隊攻防特點研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2008年11期
8 王寶珠,楚繼軍;第28屆奧運會中國男籃比賽的分析和研究[J];廣州體育學院學報;2005年02期
9 陳明;黃建文;;第27~28屆奧運會中國男籃若干技術指標的比較與分析[J];廣州體育學院學報;2006年03期
10 胡安義;舒剛民;;對第28屆奧運會男子籃球賽中國隊進攻能力的分析[J];湖北體育科技;2006年02期
相關碩士學位論文 前4條
1 江明世;中國男籃現(xiàn)狀及其對策的研究[D];山東師范大學;2004年
2 楊武;第28屆奧運會中國男籃與歐美強隊外線隊員無球?qū)沟谋容^研究[D];湖南師范大學;2005年
3 李凱;中國男籃現(xiàn)狀分析及建議研究[D];華中師范大學;2007年
4 邱春輝;近兩屆奧運會中國男籃對比分析研究[D];華中師范大學;2009年
,本文編號:1599851
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1599851.html