高�？萍冀涃M的財政投入效益研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-27 16:45
【摘要】：在經濟全球化的今天，科學技術成為國際競爭的關鍵因素。面對發(fā)達國家掌控核心技術、享有領先優(yōu)勢的局面，保證本國科技實力的不斷提升成為身為發(fā)展中國家的中國在國際競爭中占據有利地位的必由之路，這就需要國家持續(xù)強化對科技的投入。我國高校的科技活動在科教興國戰(zhàn)略實施二十多年后取得了令人矚目的改革成績，，但同時存在的問題也時刻提醒著我們發(fā)展高校科技事業(yè)的任重道遠。 本文根據2002-2010年《高�？萍冀y(tǒng)計資料匯編》的相關數據對高校科技經費的財政投入進行了研究。第三章描述性分析著重從公平視角刻畫高校的科技經費投入，整體描述和分類描述都表明高�？萍冀涃M中的政府經費在比重上占據絕對優(yōu)勢。與依據學校類型這一標準的劃分相比，在對高校按照學校規(guī)格、學校隸屬進行劃分時，學校各類別間科技經費差距更懸殊。文中按照三種標準分類后，獲得經費最多的學校類別依次為教育部直屬院校、“211”及省部共建學校和工科院校，對每類學校而言，政府經費始終是科技經費的主體。 第四章以多投入多產出為視角，著重從效率方面進行考察。DEA分析結果表明整體效率欠佳，投入產出配比失當，科技經費投入的短缺是造成效率低下的重要原因，作為這兩類高�？萍冀涃M最主要組成部分的政府撥入資金缺口的嚴重程度亟待關注和解決，同時教育部直屬院校科研績效提升的緊迫性亦不容忽視。SEM分析得到的結果顯示不論是“211”及省部共建院校整體還是其中的直屬院校，政府經費效益均低下。研究還進一步發(fā)現了科技投入對直屬與非直屬院校學術和專利兩類成果影響力度存在差異，并得出了非直屬院校比直屬院校產學研結合度更為緊密的結論。 最后一章針對實證分析得出的科技經費投入中的財政投入效益欠佳的結論，結合實際提出了改進的政策建議。 本文實證部分描述分析的總分結合、兩種方法的運用實現了對高校科技經費中財政投入公平與效率的較為全面、多維度的刻畫，擴展了對高校科技投入機制的研究，為完善高校科技投入的財政政策的制定提供了可靠依據，對推進創(chuàng)新型國家建設具有重要意義。
[Abstract]:In the economic globalization today, science and technology becomes the key factor of international competition. In the face of the developed countries taking control of the core technology and enjoying the leading edge, ensuring the continuous upgrading of their scientific and technological strength has become the only way for China, as a developing country, to occupy a favorable position in the international competition. This requires the country to continuously strengthen its investment in science and technology. The activities of science and technology in colleges and universities in our country have made remarkable achievements after the implementation of the strategy of rejuvenating the country through science and education for more than 20 years, but at the same time, the existing problems also remind us that the development of science and technology in colleges and universities has a long way to go. Based on the relevant data from 2002 to 2010, this paper studies the financial input of scientific and technological funds in colleges and universities. The third chapter focuses on describing the investment of science and technology funds from the perspective of equity. The overall description and classification description show that the government funds in the university science and technology funds occupy an absolute advantage in proportion. Compared with the classification according to the standard of school type, the disparity of scientific and technological funds among different types of schools is even greater when colleges and universities are divided according to school specifications and school subordination. According to the three kinds of standard classification, the most funded schools are the universities directly under the Ministry of Education, the "211" and the co-built schools and engineering colleges. For each kind of schools, the government funds are always the main body of the funds for science and technology. In the fourth chapter, from the perspective of multi-input and multi-output, we focus on the efficiency. DEA analysis results show that the overall efficiency is not good, the input-output ratio is mismatched, and the shortage of scientific and technological investment is the important reason for the inefficiency. As the most important part of the science and technology funds of these two kinds of colleges and universities, the severity of the gap between the government and the government needs to be paid close attention to and solved urgently. At the same time, the urgency of improving the scientific research performance of colleges directly under the Ministry of Education can not be ignored. The results obtained by SEM analysis show that the government funds benefit is low, whether it is "211" and the universities or colleges directly affiliated with the Ministry of Education. The research also found that there are differences in the influence of science and technology investment on the academic and patent achievements of both affiliated and non-affiliated colleges and universities, and the conclusion is drawn that the degree of integration of production, study and research in non-affiliated colleges is more close than that in direct-affiliated colleges. In the last chapter, according to the conclusion of the empirical analysis that the benefit of scientific and technological investment is not good, some policy suggestions are put forward. The empirical part of this paper describes the combination of the total score of the analysis, the two methods to achieve a more comprehensive and multi-dimensional depiction of the fairness and efficiency of the financial investment in the scientific and technological funds of colleges and universities, and expand the research on the mechanism of scientific and technological investment in colleges and universities. It provides a reliable basis for perfecting the financial policy of science and technology investment in colleges and universities, and is of great significance to promote the construction of innovative country.
【學位授予單位】：南京財經大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G647
本文編號：2393329
[Abstract]:In the economic globalization today, science and technology becomes the key factor of international competition. In the face of the developed countries taking control of the core technology and enjoying the leading edge, ensuring the continuous upgrading of their scientific and technological strength has become the only way for China, as a developing country, to occupy a favorable position in the international competition. This requires the country to continuously strengthen its investment in science and technology. The activities of science and technology in colleges and universities in our country have made remarkable achievements after the implementation of the strategy of rejuvenating the country through science and education for more than 20 years, but at the same time, the existing problems also remind us that the development of science and technology in colleges and universities has a long way to go. Based on the relevant data from 2002 to 2010, this paper studies the financial input of scientific and technological funds in colleges and universities. The third chapter focuses on describing the investment of science and technology funds from the perspective of equity. The overall description and classification description show that the government funds in the university science and technology funds occupy an absolute advantage in proportion. Compared with the classification according to the standard of school type, the disparity of scientific and technological funds among different types of schools is even greater when colleges and universities are divided according to school specifications and school subordination. According to the three kinds of standard classification, the most funded schools are the universities directly under the Ministry of Education, the "211" and the co-built schools and engineering colleges. For each kind of schools, the government funds are always the main body of the funds for science and technology. In the fourth chapter, from the perspective of multi-input and multi-output, we focus on the efficiency. DEA analysis results show that the overall efficiency is not good, the input-output ratio is mismatched, and the shortage of scientific and technological investment is the important reason for the inefficiency. As the most important part of the science and technology funds of these two kinds of colleges and universities, the severity of the gap between the government and the government needs to be paid close attention to and solved urgently. At the same time, the urgency of improving the scientific research performance of colleges directly under the Ministry of Education can not be ignored. The results obtained by SEM analysis show that the government funds benefit is low, whether it is "211" and the universities or colleges directly affiliated with the Ministry of Education. The research also found that there are differences in the influence of science and technology investment on the academic and patent achievements of both affiliated and non-affiliated colleges and universities, and the conclusion is drawn that the degree of integration of production, study and research in non-affiliated colleges is more close than that in direct-affiliated colleges. In the last chapter, according to the conclusion of the empirical analysis that the benefit of scientific and technological investment is not good, some policy suggestions are put forward. The empirical part of this paper describes the combination of the total score of the analysis, the two methods to achieve a more comprehensive and multi-dimensional depiction of the fairness and efficiency of the financial investment in the scientific and technological funds of colleges and universities, and expand the research on the mechanism of scientific and technological investment in colleges and universities. It provides a reliable basis for perfecting the financial policy of science and technology investment in colleges and universities, and is of great significance to promote the construction of innovative country.
【學位授予單位】：南京財經大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G647
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 姜永葳;王秀麗;;基于主成分分析的地區(qū)高�？蒲锌冃гu價研究[J];科技和產業(yè);2009年11期
2 楊燦明;李祥云;;我國高�？萍纪度胍�(guī)模、結構與效率的實證分析[J];財政研究;2005年10期
3 梁權森;彭新一;;基于DEA方法的研究型大學辦學效益評價研究[J];高等工程教育研究;2008年02期
4 李運平;李東;劉勇;;我國R&D經費配置的結構性效率研究[J];工業(yè)技術經濟;2010年09期
5 梁燕,楊健安,吳錫堯,宋劍波,王斌會;我國高�？萍纪度霗z測評價標準與實證分析[J];高教探索;2004年02期
6 梁殿超;張冬冬;;高等學校的科技投入：規(guī)模與結構[J];河北農業(yè)大學學報(農林教育版);2008年03期
7 王光平;金浩;;基于因子分析的高校科技創(chuàng)新能力的實證研究[J];河北師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年04期
8 王曉紅;王雪峰;;高�？蒲型度氘a出關系中的邊際收益遞增現象[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學學報;2006年04期
9 駱卉慧;;我國高�？蒲薪涃M投入與產出效益的實證研究[J];黑龍江生態(tài)工程職業(yè)學院學報;2008年03期
10 石麗;陳萬明;;江蘇省重點高�？蒲行试u價研究[J];南京航空航天大學學報(社會科學版);2010年04期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 周偉;基于DEA方法的研究型大學科研績效實證研究[D];天津大學;2010年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 宋劍波;高�？萍纪度氘a出模型及其方法研究[D];暨南大學;2004年
2 駱卉慧;基于DEA方法的我國高校科技系統(tǒng)效率研究[D];蘇州大學;2009年
本文編號：2393329
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/2393329.html
