【摘要】：正對教學(xué)和科研的評價,長期以來被看做學(xué)術(shù)界內(nèi)部的事情,外界甚少介入。但是,高等教育的大眾化以及高等學(xué)校與社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展關(guān)系的密切,人才的質(zhì)量、學(xué)術(shù)成果的質(zhì)量以及大學(xué)整體質(zhì)量,日益受到社會、政府等各個方面的關(guān)注。關(guān)注學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量,就不能不關(guān)注衡量學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與方法。隨著利益相關(guān)者的增加,評價高等教育質(zhì)量的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也在走向多樣化,出現(xiàn)
[Abstract]:The evaluation of teaching and scientific research has long been regarded as an internal matter of academia, with little outside intervention. However, the popularization of higher education and the close relationship between higher education and social and economic development, the quality of talents, academic achievements and the overall quality of universities have been paid more and more attention by the society, the government and so on. To pay attention to academic quality, we must pay attention to the standards and methods of measuring academic quality. As the number of stakeholders increases, the criteria for evaluating the quality of higher education are becoming more diversified.
【分類號】：G644
，

本文編號：2177128