本文選題：體育院校 + 就業(yè)壓力�。� 參考：《沈陽體育學院》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：針對當前體育院校大學生就業(yè)難的問題，本研究將對體育院校不同群體大學生在就業(yè)壓力的應對方式展開研究，分析體育院校大學生在就業(yè)壓力應對方式上的結構和特點，找出其影響因素，為他們能有更好的應對認知和行為做出正確和有效的指導。本研究采用自編“體育院校大學生就業(yè)壓力應對方式調查”問卷，對六所不同類型高校體育系共計1222名大學生進行測量，，利用探索性因子分析技術探索體育院校大學生就業(yè)應對方式的理論結構，利用均數(shù)比較技術考察不同體育院校不同群體大學生就業(yè)應對方式的特點。研究結果表明： 1.在開放式問卷搜集的就業(yè)應對方式原始項目基礎上，自編的“體育院校大學生就業(yè)應對方式”調查問卷由17個項目組成，該量表的信度和效度指標達到了心理測量學的要求，可以用于大學生就業(yè)壓力應對方式的其它相關研究。 2．采用探索性因素分析技術對體育院校大學生就業(yè)應對方式的17個項目進行了因子分析，研究發(fā)現(xiàn)體育院校大學生就業(yè)應對方式由積極行為應對、積極認知應對、消極行為應對和消極認知應對4個因子構成。 3．體育院校不同群體大學生在就業(yè)壓力應對方式各因子存在顯著差異： 1.不同生源地的體育院校大學生在積極行為和認知應對方式上存在顯著的差異，農(nóng)村體育院校大學生積極的應對方式顯著高于城市體育院校大學生。 2.不同性別的體育院校大學生在積極的行為應對方式存在顯著差異，男大學生采用積極應對方式的水平顯著高于女大學生。其他應對方式上并沒有顯著性差異。 3.不同專業(yè)的體育院校大學生在積極的認知應對方式和積極的行為應對方式兩個因素上，非體育和體育表演專業(yè)的學生顯著低于其他專業(yè)；在消極的認知和行為應對方式上，體育表演專業(yè)學生又顯著低于其他專業(yè)的學生。 4.不同年級的體育院校大學生在積極的行為應對方式上，大一和大三年級顯著高于大二和大四年級；在應對方式的認知上，大一學生的消極認識顯著高于其他三個年級。 5.不同家庭結構大學生應對方式比較：成長在正常家庭的體育院校大學生在積極的認知和行為應對方式上都顯著高于單親、再婚和其他結構家庭的學生。 6.不同父、母職業(yè)大學應對方式比較：父親職業(yè)為商人、醫(yī)生的體育院校大學生在積極的行為應對方式上顯著低于父親職業(yè)為其他類型的大學生；母親職業(yè)為教師的大學生在積極認知應對方式上顯著高于母親職業(yè)其他類型的體育院校大學生，母親職業(yè)農(nóng)民、工人、教師和其他職業(yè)的體育院校大學生在消極應對方式上顯著低于母親職業(yè)為干部、公務員和醫(yī)生的體育院校大學生。 7.對自己未來就業(yè)預測率不同的體育院校大學生在應對方式上，認為自己未來就業(yè)希望很低于和等于50%的體育院校大學生在積極的行為和認知應對方式上顯著低于認為自己就業(yè)希望大于50%大學生。
[Abstract]:In view of the problem of the difficult employment of college students in sports colleges and universities, this study will study the coping style of the college students of different groups in the sports colleges and universities in the employment pressure, analyze the structure and characteristics of the coping style of the college students in the employment pressure, and find out the influencing factors, so that they can have a better response to their cognition and behavior. In this study, the self compiled "survey on coping style of employment pressure of college students in sports colleges and universities" was used to measure 1222 college students in six different types of colleges and universities, and explore the theoretical structure of the employment of college students in sports colleges and universities by exploratory factor analysis. The characteristics of employment coping styles of different groups of students in different sports colleges and universities are studied.
1. on the basis of the original project of the employment coping style collected by the open questionnaire, the self compiled questionnaire of "College Students' employment coping style" was composed of 17 items. The reliability and validity of the scale reached the requirements of psychometrics and could be used in other related research on the coping style of College students.
2. the exploratory factor analysis technology was used to analyze the 17 projects of the college students' employment coping style in sports colleges and universities. The study found that the employment coping styles of the college students were composed of 4 factors: positive behavior coping, positive cognitive coping, negative behavior coping and negative cognitive coping.
3. there are significant differences in employment stress coping styles among different groups of students in physical education institutes.
1. there are significant differences in positive behavior and cognitive coping styles among college students in different sources of physical education. The positive coping styles of rural sports colleges and universities are significantly higher than those of urban sports colleges and universities.
2. there are significant differences in positive behavior coping styles among college students of different sex. The level of male college students using positive coping style is significantly higher than that of female students. There is no significant difference in other coping styles.
3. the students of different professional sports colleges and universities in the positive cognitive coping style and positive behavior coping style two factors, non sports and sports performance majors are significantly lower than other majors; in negative cognition and behavior coping style, sports performance majors are significantly lower than other major students.
4. the college students in different grades are significantly higher than sophomores and sophomores in their positive behavior coping styles. In coping style, the negative cognition of the freshmen is significantly higher than that of the other three grades.
5. comparison of the coping styles of college students with different family structure: the positive cognitive and behavioral coping styles of college students who grew up in normal families were significantly higher than those of single parent, remarriage and other structural families.
6. different fathers and female vocational universities should compare the ways of coping: the father profession is a businessman, the doctor's physical education college students are significantly lower than the other types of college students in the positive behavior coping style, and the students who are teachers as teachers in the positive cognitive coping style are significantly higher than those of the other types of physical education institutions of the mother's profession. College students, mothers' professional farmers, workers, teachers and other professional sports colleges and universities are significantly lower than their mothers' career as cadres, civil servants and doctors in sports colleges and universities.
7. the college students who have different forecast rates for their future employment in the sports colleges and universities think that their future employment is less than and equal to 50% of the sports college students in the positive behavior and cognitive coping style is significantly lower than that their employment hopes are greater than 50% college students.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽體育學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G807.4;G647.38

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張建衛(wèi),劉玉新,金盛華;大學生壓力與應對方式特點的實證研究[J];北京理工大學學報(社會科學版);2003年01期

2 張茂運,何光偉,劉瓊;家庭結構對大學生心理健康的影響[J];第一軍醫(yī)大學分校學報;2004年02期

3 謝琴;大學生應對方式的校別、性別及焦慮水平差異的研究[J];廣州體育學院學報;2004年01期

4 邢建輝,谷朋超,楊學文;體育院系大學生應激應付策略的研究[J];河北體育學院學報;2003年01期

5 王令坤;;家庭結構對家庭教育的影響[J];吉林教育;2008年08期

6 李偉;;高校畢業(yè)生挫折心理分析及干預[J];湖南科技學院學報;2008年06期

7 劉文;鄒麗娜;;有關幽默感的心理學理論與研究[J];遼寧師范大學學報(社會科學版);2007年02期

8 劉玉新;張建衛(wèi);;社會支持與人格對大學生應對方式的影響[J];南京師大學報(社會科學版);2006年05期

9 解繽;;應對的理論研究及其在運動領域的應用現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展方向[J];體育成人教育學刊;2006年03期

10 李江雪;李北容;;談大學生的壓力應對[J];武漢科技學院學報;2008年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 陳宇紅;大學生就業(yè)壓力及其應對方式的調查研究[D];華中師范大學;2005年

本文編號：1986294