本文選題：科研模式 + 創(chuàng)新人才　； 參考：《江西師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：綜合國(guó)力的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)歸根結(jié)底取決于創(chuàng)新人才的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)，人才資源是第一資源。創(chuàng)造性的缺失對(duì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力有非常顯著的影響，沒(méi)有創(chuàng)新也就無(wú)所謂進(jìn)步。隨著大科學(xué)時(shí)代的到來(lái)，各學(xué)科知識(shí)極大膨脹，科學(xué)的綜合性和復(fù)雜性也促使以“團(tuán)隊(duì)合作”的科研模式取代“單干”科研模式來(lái)培養(yǎng)人才成為必然趨勢(shì)。 本研究以發(fā)表在我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、醫(yī)學(xué)、生物學(xué)、化學(xué)及物理學(xué)等領(lǐng)域中影響因子最高的學(xué)術(shù)期刊中的文章作為判定研究者科研能力的依據(jù)。通過(guò)隨機(jī)數(shù)表，本研究對(duì)這五大學(xué)科中的代表性期刊近15年所刊載的文章進(jìn)行抽樣，共抽取4186篇文章作為研究樣本。通過(guò)對(duì)人才在“單干”與“團(tuán)隊(duì)”兩種科研模式下的創(chuàng)新能力進(jìn)行建模比較，本研究得出以下結(jié)論： 首先，各學(xué)科中人才在“單干”和“團(tuán)隊(duì)”科研模式下的核心知識(shí)增長(zhǎng)都呈現(xiàn)Logistic曲線分布，創(chuàng)新能力呈現(xiàn)倒“U”型曲線分布，但人才在這兩種科研模式下的成長(zhǎng)規(guī)律大不相同。“單干”科研模式下，人才的科學(xué)探究起步晚，核心知識(shí)增長(zhǎng)幅度小、極限水平低；其創(chuàng)新能力的啟發(fā)也較晚，達(dá)到創(chuàng)新巔峰的時(shí)刻更晚，創(chuàng)新黃金時(shí)間和學(xué)術(shù)周期也更短暫。“團(tuán)隊(duì)”科研模式下，人才的科學(xué)探究起步早，核心知識(shí)增長(zhǎng)幅度大，極限水平趨于最大極限值1；創(chuàng)新能力激發(fā)階段早，創(chuàng)新巔峰來(lái)的更早，，創(chuàng)新黃金時(shí)間和整個(gè)學(xué)術(shù)周期更持久。 其次，在各學(xué)科人才之間的成長(zhǎng)規(guī)律比較基礎(chǔ)之上，揭示了“單干”科研模式下社會(huì)科學(xué)中的人才的核心知識(shí)增長(zhǎng)和創(chuàng)新能力都更高，“團(tuán)隊(duì)”科研模式下社會(huì)科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)中人才的成長(zhǎng)軌跡基本一致，沒(méi)有顯著差異。 再次，在對(duì)不同學(xué)科中研究者個(gè)體在不同科研模式下的成長(zhǎng)規(guī)律進(jìn)行比較分析后，發(fā)現(xiàn)人才培養(yǎng)中存在的一些問(wèn)題，如令人窒息的教育教學(xué)方式、知識(shí)基礎(chǔ)的薄弱、國(guó)內(nèi)培養(yǎng)的博士創(chuàng)新能力低、封閉性小群體合作盛行、“50歲”現(xiàn)象等。 最后，在各學(xué)科中人才在“單干”與“團(tuán)隊(duì)”科研模式下的成長(zhǎng)規(guī)律進(jìn)行建模比較的基礎(chǔ)之上，結(jié)合我國(guó)人才培養(yǎng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況，為培養(yǎng)創(chuàng)新人才提供幾點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:In the final analysis, the competition of comprehensive national strength depends on the competition of innovative talents, and talent resource is the first resource.Lack of creativity has a very significant impact on competitiveness, without innovation there is no progress.With the arrival of the era of big science, the knowledge of various disciplines expands greatly, and the comprehensiveness and complexity of science also urge the scientific research mode of "team cooperation" to replace the "one-man" mode of scientific research to cultivate talents.This study is based on articles published in the most influential academic journals in the fields of economics, medicine, biology, chemistry and physics.Based on the random number table, this study sampled the articles published in the representative journals of the five disciplines in the past 15 years. A total of 4186 articles were selected as the research samples.By modeling and comparing the innovation ability of talents in the two scientific research modes of "doing alone" and "team", this study draws the following conclusions:First of all, the growth of core knowledge of talents in each discipline under the "one-man" and "team" scientific research mode presents the distribution of Logistic curve, and the innovation ability shows the distribution of inverted "U" curve.But the growth law of talent in these two kinds of scientific research mode is very different.Under the mode of "doing alone", the scientific exploration of talents starts late, the increase of core knowledge is small, the limit level is low, the inspiration of innovation ability is also late, the time of reaching the peak of innovation is later, and the golden time and academic cycle of innovation are also shorter.In the "team" scientific research mode, the scientific exploration of talents starts early, the core knowledge increases greatly, the limit level tends to the maximum limit value 1, the innovation ability stimulates early, and the peak of innovation comes earlier.The prime time of innovation and the whole academic cycle are more lasting.Secondly, on the basis of the comparison of the growth rules among the talents in various disciplines, it is revealed that the core knowledge growth and innovation ability of the talents in the social sciences are higher under the mode of "single job" scientific research.The growth track of talents in social science and natural science is basically the same under the "team" research mode, but there is no significant difference.Thirdly, through the comparative analysis of the growth rules of the individual researchers in different disciplines under different scientific research models, it is found that there are some problems in talent training, such as suffocating education and teaching methods, weak knowledge base.Domestic doctorate innovation ability is low, closed small group cooperation prevalence, "50 years old" phenomenon and so on.Finally, on the basis of modeling and comparison of the growth rules of talents in various disciplines under the mode of "doing alone" and "team", and combining with the actual situation of talent training in our country, some suggestions are provided for the cultivation of innovative talents.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：G642.0;G353.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 萬(wàn)文濤;余可鋒;;從美國(guó)諾貝爾獎(jiǎng)得主的成長(zhǎng)曲線看其創(chuàng)新教育[J];比較教育研究;2008年07期

2 鐘祖榮;教育要遵循人才成長(zhǎng)的規(guī)律[J];中國(guó)人才;2004年07期

3 王強(qiáng),宋協(xié)青,張子睿;創(chuàng)新型科技人才培養(yǎng)模式的研究[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

4 陸根書;彭正霞;;培育高等學(xué)校和諧學(xué)術(shù)生態(tài) 促進(jìn)基礎(chǔ)研究創(chuàng)新人才成長(zhǎng)[J];高等工程教育研究;2011年01期

5 葉永玲;;大學(xué)教師科研合作的博弈及合作動(dòng)力分析[J];高教探索;2013年03期

6 鐘海青;;按高層次人才成長(zhǎng)規(guī)律推進(jìn)研究生教育[J];廣西民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

7 丁鳳良;;探索創(chuàng)新人才培養(yǎng)模式改革的有效途徑——中關(guān)村一小“菜單式”自主選擇課程試驗(yàn)[J];北京教育(普教);2011年05期

8 王竹萍;;會(huì)計(jì)本科高等教育創(chuàng)新人才成長(zhǎng)規(guī)律的研究[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期

9 靖國(guó)平;;關(guān)于高等學(xué)校創(chuàng)新人才培養(yǎng)模式的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期

10 董澤芳;;博士生創(chuàng)新能力的提高與培養(yǎng)模式改革[J];高等教育研究;2009年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周來(lái)新;轉(zhuǎn)化醫(yī)學(xué)科研組織模式構(gòu)建的研究[D];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1754677