發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-13 07:48

【摘要】：【目的/意義】通過對(duì)美國教育智庫文獻(xiàn)的系統(tǒng)梳理,構(gòu)建更加完善的教育智庫研究理論體系,以期指導(dǎo)我國教育智庫健康發(fā)展�！痉椒�/過程】文章從歷史路徑研究范式、思辨研究范式、實(shí)證主義研究范式和國際比較研究范式等方面對(duì)美國教育智庫研究文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行分析,提出了未來教育智庫研究的重點(diǎn),并總結(jié)歸納美國教育智庫對(duì)我國教育智庫建設(shè)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)啟示�！窘Y(jié)果/結(jié)論】教育智庫研究成果豐碩,但由于各國國情不同,因此,未來教育智庫研究更需要關(guān)注本國國情,重視問題導(dǎo)向,為教育決策提供有利證據(jù)。
[Abstract]:[objective / significance] by systematically combing the literature of American educational think tanks, to construct a more perfect theoretical system of educational think tanks, in order to guide the healthy development of our country's educational think tanks. [methods / process] the paper studies the paradigm from the historical path. This paper analyzes the American educational think-tank research literature from the aspects of speculative research paradigm, positivist research paradigm and international comparative research paradigm, and puts forward the key points of the future educational think-tank research. [results / conclusion] the research results of educational think tanks are fruitful, but because of the different national conditions of different countries, the future education think tanks research needs to pay more attention to their own national conditions. Pay attention to problem orientation and provide favorable evidence for educational decision-making.
【作者單位】： 吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院;吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)高等教育研究所;吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)研究生院;
【基金】：吉林省教育規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目(GH150211)
【分類號(hào)】：G571.2
，

本文編號(hào)：2267828