本文選題：大學(xué)生　切入點：沖動行為量表　出處：《中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志》2017年04期

【摘要】：目的:檢驗簡式UPPS-P沖動行為量表(Short Version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale,S-UPPS-P)在大學(xué)生中的信度和效度。方法:調(diào)查725名大學(xué)生,回收有效問卷693份,并在四周后隨機選取116名大學(xué)生進行重測。另用UPPS沖動行為量表檢驗內(nèi)容效度,用Barratt沖動量表(BIS-11)、米氏邊緣性人格障礙檢測表(MSI-BPD)與Buss和Perry攻擊問卷中文版(AQ-CV)檢驗效標關(guān)聯(lián)效度。結(jié)果:S-UPPS-P中文版包括負性急迫性、缺乏堅持性、缺乏預(yù)見性、感覺尋求和正性急迫性5個因子,共20個條目;總問卷的內(nèi)部一致性信度和重測信度都為0.77,五個維度的內(nèi)部一致性信度分別為0.67、0.69、0.71、0.69、0.80,重測信度分別為0.77、0.65、0.63、0.66、0.75,合成信度分別為0.80、0.81、0.85、0.82、0.87;驗證性因素分析結(jié)果顯示五因素模型擬合良好(χ~2/df=2.41,NFI=0.90,CFI=0.94,IFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,RMSEA=0.05);量表總分與UPPS、BIS-11、MSI-BPD、AQ-CV得分呈正相關(guān)(r=0.60、0.53、0.26、0.34,均P0.01)。結(jié)論:S-UPPS-P中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于評估中國大學(xué)生的沖動性。
[Abstract]:Objective: to test the reliability and validity of short Version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior scale S-UPPS-P in college students. Methods: 725 college students were investigated and 693 valid questionnaires were collected. After four weeks, 116 college students were randomly selected for retest, and the content validity was tested by UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Barratt impulse scale (BIS-11P), MSI-BPDand Buss and Perry aggression questionnaire were used to test the validity of the efficacy criteria. Results the Chinese version of the Chinese version of the Chinese version of the Chinese version of the Perry aggression questionnaire included negative urgency, lack of persistence, and lack of predictability, and the Chinese version included negative urgency, lack of persistence, and lack of predictability, and the Chinese version of the questionnaire showed negative urgency, lack of persistence, and lack of predictability. Sensory search and positive urgency 5 factors, a total of 20 entries; The internal consistency reliability and retest reliability of the total questionnaire were both 0.77, the internal consistency reliability of the five dimensions were 0.67 / 0. 69 / 0. 79 / 0.80, the retest reliability were 0. 77 / 0. 653 / 0. 663 / 0. 75, and the composite reliability were 0. 800. 81 / 0. 852 / 0. 87 respectively. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five factor models fitted well. Good (蠂 ~ 2 / 2 / dft 2.41 / NFI = 0.90 / CFI = 0.94TLI = 0.93TLI = 0.93RMSEAA = 0.055.The total score of the scale was positively correlated with the score of UPPSBIS-11MSI-BPDV AQ-CV 0.600.600.530.260.34, all P0.01.Conclusion the Chinese version of ": S-UPPS-P" has good reliability and validity, and the total score of the scale is positively correlated with the score of UPPSBIS-11MSI-BPD-AQ-CV. It can be used to evaluate the impulsiveness of Chinese college students.
【作者單位】： 山西醫(yī)科大學(xué)人文社會科學(xué)學(xué)院;
【基金】：2015年度教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究規(guī)劃基金項目(15YJA190009)
【分類號】：G444

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 趙美榮,李玉香,陳衛(wèi),劉遂成,呂寶良;635名鄭州市“兒童適應(yīng)行為量表”測查分析[J];中國行為醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué);1998年01期

2 韋小滿;兒童適應(yīng)行為量表的編制與標準化[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;1996年04期

3 何定武;深圳市4～6歲兒童Conners行為量表得分分析[J];健康心理學(xué)雜志;2003年01期

4 郭蘭婷,單友荷,張惠開,張秋水,趙小菲;AAMD兒童適應(yīng)行為量表的初步試用[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;1998年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 張雨霖;陳學(xué)志;邱發(fā)忠;徐芝君;;國中教師創(chuàng)造力教學(xué)行為量表之編制與相關(guān)研究[A];全國教育與心理統(tǒng)計與測量學(xué)術(shù)年會暨第八屆海峽兩岸心理與教育測驗學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文摘要集[C];2008年

，

本文編號：1671654