高中生認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略與抑郁焦慮關系
發(fā)布時間:2018-01-07 21:09
本文關鍵詞:高中生認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略與抑郁焦慮關系 出處:《中國公共衛(wèi)生》2017年04期 論文類型:期刊論文
更多相關文章: 高中生 認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略 抑郁 焦慮
【摘要】:目的探討高中生認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略與抑郁、焦慮的關系。方法 2014年3—4月,采用隨機分層整群抽樣方法,在河北省張家口、唐山、保定、石家莊、邢臺、衡水6個市的7所中學(其中石家莊2所中學),每個中學隨機抽取2個高中班共648名高中生,使用認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)問卷、抑郁自評量表、焦慮自評量表進行問卷調(diào)查。結果有抑郁癥狀學生160人,占24.69%,有焦慮癥狀的學生26人,占4.01%,既有焦慮又有抑郁癥狀的學生142人,占21.9%,正常學生320人,占49.4%;回歸分析表明,災難化和沉思正向預測抑郁和焦慮(均P0.05),積極設想負向預測抑郁和焦慮(均P0.05);抑郁者比焦慮者較少采用積極調(diào)整(11.97±3.84 vs 14.15±2.98,P0.05)和積極設想(22.83±6.29 vs 27.63±5.28,P0.05),焦慮者比抑郁者較多采用責備他人(9.80±3.35 vs 8.91±3.12,P0.05)。抑郁焦慮共病的高中生比焦慮、抑郁者更多采用沉思默想(11.08±2.63 vs 9.55±2.68 vs 8.87±2.47,P0.05)、自我安慰(6.52±4.29 vs 5.00±2.15 vs 4.77±1.73,P0.05)和災難化(12.28±3.80 vs 10.15±4.08 vs9.27±3.43,P0.05)。結論對青少年進行有針對性的認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)訓練可以減輕抑郁和焦慮。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the cognitive emotion regulation and depression of senior high school students, the relationship of anxiety. Methods from 2014 3 to April, by randomly stratified cluster sampling method, in Hebei Province, Zhangjiakou, Tangshan, Baoding, Shijiazhuang, Xingtai, 7 secondary schools in 6 cities of Hengshui (the Shijiazhuang 2 middle school), each of 2 randomly selected middle school high school class of 648 high school students cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire, self rating depression scale, self rating Anxiety Scale questionnaire. Results 160 students had depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms accounted for 24.69%, 26 students, accounting for 4.01%, both anxiety and depressive symptoms of the 142 students, normal students accounted for 21.9%, 320 people, accounting for 49.4%; regression analysis showed that the disaster and meditation positively predicted depression and anxiety (P0.05), assume the positive negative predictive of depression and anxiety (P0.05); depression than anxiety with less positive adjustment (11.97 + 3.84 vs 14.15 + 2.98, P0.0 5) and positive assumption (22.83 + 6.29 vs 27.63 + 5.28, P0.05), anxiety depression more than by blaming others (9.80 + 3.35 vs 8.91 + 3.12, P0.05). The high school students of comorbid anxiety and depression than anxiety, depression is more adopted by the 2.63 vs 9.55 be in a brown study (11.08 + 8.87 + 2.68 + vs 2.47, P0.05), comfort (6.52 + 4.29 vs 5 + 2.15 vs 4.77 + 1.73, P0.05) and disaster (12.28 + 3.80 vs 10.15 + 4.08 vs9.27 + 3.43, P0.05). Conclusion the cognitive emotional regulation training can alleviate the anxiety and depression in adolescents.
【作者單位】: 邢臺學院教育科學教學部;
【基金】:河北省社會科學基金(HB14JY010)
【分類號】:G444;R749
【正文快照】: 焦慮、抑郁是高中生最常見的情緒問題。認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)由荷蘭心理學家Garnefski提出,主要指個體在處理負性生活事件時所采取的認知應對策略[1]。有研究證實,在面對情緒壓力的時候,采用積極的認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略的個體焦慮、抑郁的檢出率顯著低于采用消極的認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略的個體[
【相似文獻】
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 胡靜;生態(tài)移民兒童沖動、攻擊行為的認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略及干預研究[D];寧夏醫(yī)科大學;2016年
2 孔繁智;銀川市老年人抑郁與情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略的相關性研究[D];寧夏醫(yī)科大學;2016年
3 張旭;住院網(wǎng)絡成癮青少年抑郁與認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略的研究[D];大連醫(yī)科大學;2013年
,本文編號:1394228
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/1394228.html
最近更新
教材專著