【摘要】：白璧德(Iriving Babbitt,1865-1933),美國(guó)哈佛大學(xué)法國(guó)文學(xué)和比較文學(xué)教授、文學(xué)家和文化批評(píng)家,是美國(guó)“新人文主義”運(yùn)動(dòng)的代表人物。在推進(jìn)“新人文主義”教育的道路上,白璧德不遺余力,與摯友穆爾惺惺相惜,使該運(yùn)動(dòng)在教學(xué)實(shí)踐層面滲入到政治、歷史、文學(xué)、倫理等人文學(xué)科課程領(lǐng)域,并開發(fā)出了諸多旨在實(shí)現(xiàn)其新古典人文教育理想的課程。 本研究主要分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分討論白璧德新古典人文教育理想的形成過(guò)程與內(nèi)涵,揭示白璧德教育思想形成的基礎(chǔ),思想形成的影響因素以及新古典人文教育理想的基本內(nèi)涵。在家庭成員、教育教學(xué)生涯、社會(huì)背景的影響下,白璧德將自己的新古典人文教育依托在歐洲古典文化和美國(guó)本土文化以及東方佛陀、儒家文化上,闡明新古典人文教育的目的及實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑。 第二部分探討白璧德新古典人文教育理想的課程開發(fā)與實(shí)踐,著重探討白璧德為實(shí)現(xiàn)教育理想具體開發(fā)了哪些課程,課程教學(xué)目標(biāo)及內(nèi)容為何,如何實(shí)施所開發(fā)的課程。總的來(lái)說(shuō),白璧德開發(fā)了兩類課程：現(xiàn)代思想批判課程和古典文化課程。前者的課程內(nèi)容主要圍繞如何批判盧梭、培根等現(xiàn)代思想展開,旨在引導(dǎo)學(xué)生像自己一樣認(rèn)識(shí)到人文危機(jī)并批判這類現(xiàn)代思想；后者課程內(nèi)容主要為古希臘文化、宗教文化、儒學(xué),旨在引導(dǎo)學(xué)生重建真正有意義的人文思想和生活方式。 第三部分分析白璧德新古典人文課程開發(fā)的效果。主要借由與同時(shí)代學(xué)者之間的思想交匯來(lái)展現(xiàn)。與哈佛大學(xué)C.W艾略特的斗爭(zhēng),其學(xué)生T.S艾略特的批判與繼承,更有以吳宓為代表的中國(guó)學(xué)生對(duì)其思想的傳播,無(wú)論是追隨者還是反對(duì)者,均表達(dá)了白璧德新古典人文課程開發(fā)的強(qiáng)大效果。 最后一部分主要揭示白璧德新古典人文教育理想對(duì)現(xiàn)代人文教育的啟示。簡(jiǎn)單剖析我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段人文教育的實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀,并根據(jù)我國(guó)教育的語(yǔ)境,從課程開發(fā)和教學(xué)實(shí)施兩個(gè)層面揭示白璧德新古典人文教育理想對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)代人文教育的啟示。
[Abstract]:Iriving Babbitt,1865-1933, a professor of French and comparative literature at Harvard University, a writer and a cultural critic, is a representative of the "New Humanism" movement in the United States. On the road of promoting the education of "new humanism", Babbitt spared no effort to share with his close friend Moore, so that the movement infiltrated into the fields of politics, history, literature, ethics and other humanities courses at the level of teaching practice. And developed a lot of courses aimed at realizing its new classical humanistic education ideal. This research is mainly divided into four parts: the first part discusses the formation process and connotation of Babbitt's new classical humanistic education ideal, and reveals the foundation of Babbitt's educational thought. The influence factors of thought formation and the basic connotation of the ideal of neoclassical humanistic education. Under the influence of family members, teaching career and social background, Babbitt relies his Neo-Classical Humanities Education on European classical culture and American native culture, as well as Oriental Buddha and Confucian culture. This paper expounds the aim and the way to realize the new classical humanities education. The second part discusses the curriculum development and practice of Babbitt's ideal of Neo-Classical Humanities Education, focusing on what curriculum Babbitt has developed for the realization of educational ideal, what curriculum teaching objectives and contents are, and how to carry out the developed curriculum. In general, Babbitt has developed two courses: critique of modern thought and classical culture. The former curriculum mainly revolves around how to criticize Rousseau Bacon and other modern thoughts in order to guide students to recognize the humanistic crisis and criticize such modern thoughts as themselves. The latter course mainly consists of ancient Greek culture, religious culture and Confucianism, which aims to guide students to rebuild their real meaningful humanistic thought and lifestyle. The third part analyzes the effect of Babbitt's new classical humanities curriculum development. Mainly by reason and contemporary scholars to show the intersection of ideas. In the struggle against C.W Eliot at Harvard University, the criticism and inheritance of T.S. Eliot, a student of Harvard University, is even more marked by the spread of his ideas by Chinese students represented by Wu Mi, whether they are followers or opponents. Both expressed the powerful effect of the development of Babbitt's New Classical Humanities course. The last part mainly reveals the enlightenment of Babbitt's new classical humanistic education ideal to modern humanistic education. This paper briefly analyzes the present situation of humanistic education in our country, and according to the context of education in China, reveals the enlightenment of Babbitt's new classical humanistic education ideal to modern humanistic education in China from the two aspects of curriculum development and teaching implementation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：G40-09

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周勇;;一位大學(xué)講師的文化戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)宣言——評(píng)白壁德的《文學(xué)與美國(guó)的大學(xué)》[J];北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論;2006年02期

2 郭艷娟;傳統(tǒng)·個(gè)人·現(xiàn)代性——重新評(píng)價(jià)艾略特的《傳統(tǒng)與個(gè)人才能》[J];當(dāng)代外國(guó)文學(xué);2001年04期

3 朱壽桐;;中國(guó)新人文主義文人群體的確認(rèn)[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

4 朱壽桐;現(xiàn)代人文主義的人生禮教讀本——論吳宓的《文學(xué)與人生》[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年02期

5 卜玉華;;葉瀾“生命·實(shí)踐”教育學(xué)創(chuàng)建的思想路徑[J];高校理論戰(zhàn)線;2011年09期

6 劉小新;;白璧德與20世紀(jì)初留美學(xué)生文化守成思想的形成[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

7 王坤慶;新世紀(jì)人文主義教育價(jià)值觀思考[J];教育研究;2000年08期

8 燕燕;人文教育理念的歷史嬗變與啟示[J];教育研究;2004年08期

9 劉黎紅;論吳宓留學(xué)前的文化經(jīng)歷與其文化取向的關(guān)系[J];青島大學(xué)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

10 羅志田;;一次寧?kù)o的革命:清華國(guó)學(xué)院的獨(dú)特追求[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2415825