本文選題：韓國私教育　切入點(diǎn)：中國私教育　出處：《上海外國語大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：教育是一個國家國民素質(zhì)養(yǎng)成的過程，也是這個國家的建設(shè)社會的手段，因此教育是一個國家的治國之本。中國和韓國的國民都特別熱衷于教育，不分伯仲。當(dāng)這種熱衷過于突出時，學(xué)校教育就再也無法滿足國民的這種教育欲求，因此就出現(xiàn)了新興的教育形態(tài)——私教育（中國叫課外補(bǔ)習(xí)）。 私教育就是與國家及地方設(shè)立和運(yùn)營的學(xué)校教育或者公共教育相對立的一種教育形式，特指除國家管理的教育機(jī)關(guān)，如幼兒、小、中學(xué)教育機(jī)關(guān)之外的教育形式。即，國家法定管理的教育機(jī)關(guān)之外的教育形式。 最近，在韓國私教育問題已成為了一個社會熱議的話題，在中國也出現(xiàn)了類似的現(xiàn)象。所以本文旨在通過對中韓兩國私教育方面的比較分析，尋找可以促使中國私教育健全發(fā)展的良方。為此，本文首先考察了私教育的定義，影響兩國私教育需求的原因，以及中韓兩國對于私教育的先行研究。之后，對中韓兩國的私教育狀況進(jìn)行了比較，找出了共同點(diǎn)和不同點(diǎn)，希望從韓國的私教育現(xiàn)狀當(dāng)中對中國的私教育改善獲得啟發(fā)。 具體來講，在第二章當(dāng)中筆者著重考察了私教育的概念，影響兩國私教育需求的因素，以及中韓兩國對于私教育的先行研究。私教育是相對于公共教育而言的，在國家管理的教育機(jī)關(guān)以外開展的教育形式。影響其需求的因素主要分為學(xué)校因素，社會因素，以及學(xué)生父母因素和生源因素等。從各種先行研究的資料來看，為了比較兩國私教育的特征，本文主要比較分析了兩國私教育的形式和參與度、時間和科目、費(fèi)用以及政策。 第三章當(dāng)中，為了找出中韓兩國私教育的共同點(diǎn)和不同點(diǎn)，著重分析了私教育的六個方面。首先，從私教育機(jī)關(guān)來看，韓國的私教育機(jī)關(guān)規(guī)模大且非常多，，但比較之下中國的私教育機(jī)關(guān)規(guī)模相對較小；從參與度上來看，韓國的參與度很高而中國私教育的參與度相對較低。其次，從時間和科目上來看，兩國出現(xiàn)較突出的不同之處。韓國學(xué)生接受私教育的時間普遍比較長，科目主要是國語，英語和數(shù)學(xué)，而中國學(xué)生教授私教育的時間相對較短，且科目以英語和數(shù)學(xué)為主，沒有語文；從私教育費(fèi)用方面來看，中韓兩國學(xué)生父母都在私教育上面花費(fèi)不少，但從家庭整體的收入比重上來看，中國的費(fèi)用支出比韓國反而更多。從兩國私教育政策方面來看，韓國對于私教育曾在多個階段進(jìn)行了多種政策的試行，但與此相比，中國政府對于私教育問題至今還未出任何的政策。筆者認(rèn)為，現(xiàn)在中國的私教育現(xiàn)象愈發(fā)迅速擴(kuò)張，是時候需要從政府層面進(jìn)行適當(dāng)管理了。 通過分析中韓兩國的私教育現(xiàn)狀，也發(fā)現(xiàn)了非常多兩者的共同點(diǎn)。但從韓國的私教育發(fā)展情況來看，中國現(xiàn)今的私教育可以說還處于初級階段。中國的私教育內(nèi)容與韓國的內(nèi)容非常相似，都是與入學(xué)考試緊密相關(guān)，但從私教育機(jī)關(guān)的企業(yè)化及規(guī)模化情況來看，相比韓國還非常的落后。但預(yù)計在不久的將來，中國的私教育也會發(fā)展成非常專業(yè)化，規(guī)�；慕逃问�。因此，站在中國政府的角度上來講，急需加深對于私教育現(xiàn)象的理解和管理，強(qiáng)化公共教育，從根本上解決經(jīng)濟(jì)不均衡問題，從而引導(dǎo)中國的私教育發(fā)展走上健全發(fā)展，規(guī)�；l(fā)展的道路。
[Abstract]:Education is a process of the formation of a nation ' s national quality , and it is a means of building society in this country , so education is a country ' s governing country . People in China and South Korea are particularly keen on education and do not divide . When this kind of enthusiasm is too prominent , school education can no longer meet the demand of the nation ' s education , so there is emerging education form _ private education ( China is called extra - class remedial learning ) .

Private education is a kind of educational form that is opposite to the school education or public education established and operated by the state and the place , especially the educational institutions other than the state administration , such as children , small and middle school education institutions , that is , the educational form outside the educational institutions of the national legal administration .

Recently , the problem of private education in South Korea has become a topic of social thermal discussion , and similar phenomena have occurred in China . Therefore , this paper aims to find a good way to promote the healthy development of private education in China through comparative analysis of the private education between China and South Korea .

In the second chapter , the author focuses on the concept of private education , the factors influencing the demand of private education in the two countries , and the research on the pre - study of private education in China and South Korea . The factors that influence the demand are mainly divided into school factors , social factors , student ' s parents ' factors and source factors . In order to compare the characteristics of the two countries ' private education , this paper mainly compares the form and participation , time and subject , cost and policy of the two countries ' private education .

In the third chapter , in order to find the common point and difference between the two countries ' private education in China and Korea , the six aspects of private education are emphatically analyzed . First , from the private education authorities , the private educational institutions in South Korea are large and very large , but the scale of private education institutions in China is relatively small .
In terms of participation , South Korea ' s participation is high and the participation of private education in China is relatively low . Secondly , in terms of time and subject , the two countries have more prominent differences . Korean students are generally longer in private education , mainly in Mandarin , English and mathematics , while Chinese students teach private education relatively short , and subjects are dominated by English and mathematics , and no language ;
From the perspective of private education , both parents of China and South Korea have spent quite a lot of private education , but in terms of the overall income of the family , China ' s expense expenditure is more than that of South Korea . From the perspective of private education policy in the two countries , the Chinese government has not yet done any policy on private education . The author believes that the phenomenon of private education in China has become more and more rapidly expanding , and it is time to carry out proper management from the government level .

Through analyzing the current situation of private education in China and South Korea , it has also found a lot of common ground . But from the development of private education in Korea , China ' s current private education can be said to be still in the primary stage . However , in the near future , China ' s private education will be developed into a very professional and large - scale educational form . Therefore , in the future , China ' s private education will be developed into a very professional and large - scale educational form . Therefore , in the perspective of the Chinese government , it is urgent to deepen the understanding and management of the phenomenon of private education , strengthen public education , and fundamentally solve the problems of economic imbalance , thus leading the development of private education in China to a sound development and a road of large - scale development .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G511;G40-059.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 薛海平;丁小浩;;中國城鎮(zhèn)學(xué)生教育補(bǔ)習(xí)研究[J];教育研究;2009年01期

本文編號：1723933