“媒介
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-25 15:44
【摘要】：西學東漸以來,中西學術間的激蕩與互動從未止息。伴隨著國學的沉淪與復興,一個亟待突破的命題日益凸顯,這就是中西學術方法的融合、再造與創(chuàng)新。本期刊發(fā)的三篇文章即對此作出了有益的嘗試。葉舒憲《四重證據:知識的整合與立體釋古》繼上世紀90年代中期的"三重證據法"之后,又提出"四重證據法"的命題,強調文史研究中文獻之外的人類學、考古學材料的重要性,認為對非文字材料的自覺利用和多學科知識的整合,給國學的考據傳統(tǒng)帶來視野和方法的大變革。代云紅《"媒介場"視域中的"多重證據法"》認為在"多重證據法"的結構框架中,存在著以文字符號為中心的書寫媒介文化和以非文字符號為中心的口傳及圖像媒介文化,必須警惕"多重證據法"中的媒介霸權、符號暴力和文化意識形態(tài)。孟華《圖像證據的符號學分析》從符號學角度研究圖像與待證事實之間的真實關聯(lián)度,討論了兩種圖像理據:結構理據和意指理據。探索跨文化跨學科的知識整合與人文科學學術方法的創(chuàng)新正是上述三文價值之所在。
[Abstract]:Since the development of western learning to the east, the agitation and interaction between Chinese and Western scholars have never stopped. With the decline and rejuvenation of Chinese traditional culture, an urgent topic is becoming more and more prominent, that is, the integration, reconstruction and innovation of Chinese and Western academic methods. Three articles published in this issue have made a beneficial attempt. Ye Shuxian, "Quadric evidence: integration of knowledge and Three-dimensional interpretation of Ancient Times", after the "Triple evidence Law" in the mid-1990s, he put forward the proposition of "quadruple evidence Law", emphasizing anthropology outside the literature in the study of literary history. The importance of archaeological materials suggests that the conscious use of non-written materials and the integration of multidisciplinary knowledge have brought great changes to the traditional textual research of Chinese culture. Dai Yun Hong < "multiple evidence Law" in the View of "Media Field" thinks that in the frame of structure of "multiple evidence Law", there exists writing media culture centered on character symbol and oral and image media culture centered on non-character symbol. We must guard against media hegemony, symbolic violence and cultural ideology in the multiple evidence Act. From the perspective of semiotics, Meng Hua studies the true correlation between the image and the facts to be proved, and discusses two kinds of image motivation: structural motivation and implied motivation. Exploring the cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary knowledge integration and the innovation of the humanities academic method is the value of the above three articles.
【作者單位】： 云南曲靖師范學院人文學院;
【分類號】：K06
本文編號：2144286
[Abstract]:Since the development of western learning to the east, the agitation and interaction between Chinese and Western scholars have never stopped. With the decline and rejuvenation of Chinese traditional culture, an urgent topic is becoming more and more prominent, that is, the integration, reconstruction and innovation of Chinese and Western academic methods. Three articles published in this issue have made a beneficial attempt. Ye Shuxian, "Quadric evidence: integration of knowledge and Three-dimensional interpretation of Ancient Times", after the "Triple evidence Law" in the mid-1990s, he put forward the proposition of "quadruple evidence Law", emphasizing anthropology outside the literature in the study of literary history. The importance of archaeological materials suggests that the conscious use of non-written materials and the integration of multidisciplinary knowledge have brought great changes to the traditional textual research of Chinese culture. Dai Yun Hong < "multiple evidence Law" in the View of "Media Field" thinks that in the frame of structure of "multiple evidence Law", there exists writing media culture centered on character symbol and oral and image media culture centered on non-character symbol. We must guard against media hegemony, symbolic violence and cultural ideology in the multiple evidence Act. From the perspective of semiotics, Meng Hua studies the true correlation between the image and the facts to be proved, and discusses two kinds of image motivation: structural motivation and implied motivation. Exploring the cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary knowledge integration and the innovation of the humanities academic method is the value of the above three articles.
【作者單位】： 云南曲靖師范學院人文學院;
【分類號】：K06
【相似文獻】
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 中國社科院文學所研究員、上海交通大學致遠講席教授 葉舒憲;中國文化再認識：從解讀神話編碼開始[N];中華讀書報;2011年
，本文編號：2144286
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/guoxuejiaoyulunwen/2144286.html
