哲學(xué)的意識形態(tài)性與馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育改革
本文選題:馬克思主義哲學(xué) 切入點(diǎn):教育 出處:《西華師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:哲學(xué)作為一種意識形態(tài),在階級社會(huì)中總是為一定階級利益服務(wù)的,從來就不存在任何脫離了政治的哲學(xué)。但是,從來沒有哪一種哲學(xué)像馬克思主義哲學(xué)這樣,以“不屑于隱瞞自己觀點(diǎn)”的鮮明立場,公然地把自己的政治訴求作為哲學(xué)的目標(biāo)。顯然,我們?nèi)羰前粗R克思主義哲學(xué)的理論本性來進(jìn)行馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育的話,就斷然不能淡化了馬克思主義哲學(xué)的意識形態(tài)功能,否則,馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育就與一般學(xué)科知識的傳授無異了。但是,在教學(xué)中我們也不能過度地強(qiáng)調(diào)馬克思主義哲學(xué)的意識形態(tài)功能,因?yàn)轳R克思主義哲學(xué)畢竟屬于哲學(xué)理論而不等同于政治。馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育從本質(zhì)上來講屬于世界觀的教育,它主要是通過對受教育者的思想素質(zhì),尤其是理性思維方式的培養(yǎng)以達(dá)到政治導(dǎo)向的目標(biāo)。顯然,那種片面地強(qiáng)調(diào)理論要為政治服務(wù),把馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育的意識形態(tài)導(dǎo)向功能簡化為政治宣傳、政治說教,把馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育當(dāng)作是解釋政策、論證時(shí)事的手段也是不符合馬克思主義哲學(xué)理論本性的。然而,長期以來由于受到種種歷史的或現(xiàn)實(shí)的因素的影響,這兩種情況卻又都存在于我們的哲學(xué)教育過程當(dāng)中?梢哉f,存在于馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育過程當(dāng)中的這兩種情況都沒有真正發(fā)揮出馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育應(yīng)有的意識形態(tài)導(dǎo)向功能,因而在相當(dāng)大程度上都造成了以往的馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育沒有取得應(yīng)有的教學(xué)效果。顯然,探究兩種“傾向”的成因,并努力尋找解決問題的途徑,已經(jīng)成為深化和推進(jìn)馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育改革必須面對的一個(gè)現(xiàn)實(shí)問題。本文采取了文獻(xiàn)分析法以及理論與實(shí)際相結(jié)合的方法,廣泛借鑒并吸收相關(guān)領(lǐng)域國內(nèi)外專家學(xué)者的研究成果,結(jié)合馬克思主義哲學(xué)教學(xué)過程中的具體問題,以實(shí)現(xiàn)馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育的意識形態(tài)性回歸為切入點(diǎn)進(jìn)行研究。本文共分為四個(gè)部分。第一章,緒論部分,對本選題的研究目的與意義、研究的重點(diǎn)與難點(diǎn)以及國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀等進(jìn)行了綜合的說明。第二章,主要圍繞什么是意識形態(tài)以及哲學(xué)的意識形態(tài)性兩個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容對哲學(xué)的意識形態(tài)性內(nèi)涵作了分析。第三章,分析了馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育意識形態(tài)性偏離的兩種現(xiàn)象,并對兩種現(xiàn)象各自的表現(xiàn)與成因進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的闡述。第四章,以如何實(shí)現(xiàn)馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育的意識形態(tài)性回歸為主線,從實(shí)現(xiàn)馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育的意識形態(tài)性回歸的基本要求及其實(shí)現(xiàn)的具體途徑兩個(gè)方向進(jìn)行了具體的論述。
[Abstract]:Philosophy, as an ideology, always serves the interests of a certain class in a class society, and there has never been any philosophy divorced from politics.However, there has never been any philosophy such as Marxist philosophy, with the stand of "disdainful of concealing one's point of view" and openly regarding one's own political appeal as the philosophy's goal.Obviously, if we carry out Marxist philosophy education according to the theoretical nature of Marxist philosophy, we cannot downplay the ideological function of Marxist philosophy, otherwise,Marxist philosophy education is no different from the teaching of general knowledge.However, we should not overemphasize the ideological function of Marxist philosophy in teaching, because Marxist philosophy belongs to philosophical theory and is not equal to politics after all.Essentially, Marxist philosophy education belongs to the education of world outlook. It mainly aims at achieving the goal of political orientation through the cultivation of the ideological quality of the educated, especially the rational mode of thinking.Obviously, that kind of one-sided emphasis on theory should serve politics, simplify the ideological guiding function of Marxist philosophy education into political propaganda, political preaching, and treat Marxist philosophical education as an interpretative policy.The means of demonstrating current affairs are also inconsistent with the nature of Marxist philosophical theory.However, for a long time, because of the influence of various historical or realistic factors, these two situations both exist in the course of our philosophy education.It can be said that the two situations that exist in the process of Marxist philosophy education have not really brought into play the ideological guidance function that Marxist philosophical education should have.Therefore, to a large extent, Marxist philosophy education in the past did not achieve due teaching results.Obviously, exploring the causes of the two "tendencies" and trying to find a way to solve the problems have become a realistic problem that must be faced in deepening and pushing forward the reform of Marxist philosophy education.This paper adopts the method of literature analysis and the combination of theory and practice, draws on and absorbs the research achievements of experts and scholars in related fields, and combines the concrete problems in the course of Marxist philosophy teaching.To realize the ideological return of Marxist philosophy education as the starting point to study.This paper is divided into four parts.The first chapter, the introduction, gives a comprehensive explanation of the purpose and significance of this topic, the key points and difficulties of the research, and the current research situation at home and abroad.The second chapter analyzes the ideological connotation of philosophy around what ideology is and the ideological nature of philosophy.The third chapter analyzes the two phenomena of ideological deviation in Marxist philosophy education, and expounds their respective manifestations and causes in detail.The fourth chapter, taking how to realize the ideological return of Marxist philosophy education as the main line, has carried on the concrete elaboration from two aspects: the basic request and the concrete way of realizing the ideological return of the Marxist philosophy education.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西華師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:G641
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊杰;;堅(jiān)持馬克思主義在意識形態(tài)領(lǐng)域指導(dǎo)地位的時(shí)代意義[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年11期
2 李世書;;“馬克思主義哲學(xué)原理”課程教學(xué)改革與實(shí)踐[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2010年07期
3 王婷;;以哲學(xué)的方式對待哲學(xué)——談高校馬克思主義哲學(xué)教學(xué)改革[J];繼續(xù)教育研究;2009年10期
4 黃禧禎;;論哲學(xué)教育的“哲學(xué)方式”——兼論馬克思主義哲學(xué)教育生活化的范式[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期
5 秋石;;為什么必須堅(jiān)持馬克思主義在意識形態(tài)領(lǐng)域的指導(dǎo)地位而不能搞指導(dǎo)思想的多元化[J];求是;2009年06期
6 梅榮政;;馬克思主義指導(dǎo)思想是社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系的靈魂[J];高校理論戰(zhàn)線;2007年03期
7 鄭琴;;對馬克思主義哲學(xué)教學(xué)改革的反思[J];楚雄師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年08期
8 李海洋;;論公共哲學(xué)教育的意識形態(tài)性[J];南陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期
9 蘇志宏;“馬克思主義哲學(xué)原理”教學(xué)改革初探[J];思想理論教育導(dǎo)刊;2005年01期
10 汪信硯;對我國高校馬克思主義哲學(xué)教學(xué)改革的反思[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期
,本文編號:1713248
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/gaodengjiaoyulunwen/1713248.html