本文關(guān)鍵詞：大學(xué)生科學(xué)探究能力評(píng)價(jià)研究　出處：《東南大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 大學(xué)生 科學(xué)探究能力評(píng)價(jià) 工作單 紙筆測試

【摘要】：從20世紀(jì)中后期開始,以美國為首的國家開始進(jìn)行科學(xué)教育改革,各國政府及相關(guān)國際評(píng)價(jià)組織越來越重視對(duì)學(xué)生科學(xué)探究能力水平的評(píng)價(jià)。而通過前期閱讀相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)發(fā)現(xiàn),我國有關(guān)科學(xué)探究能力的研究對(duì)象大多數(shù)集中于中小學(xué)生,針對(duì)大學(xué)生科學(xué)探究能力的研究相對(duì)匱乏,并且評(píng)價(jià)方式單一。本研究選擇南京某重點(diǎn)高校及某普通高校大一學(xué)生,對(duì)其科學(xué)探究能力水平進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。本研究主要包括以下兩方面的內(nèi)容：(1)理論研究：對(duì)有關(guān)概念進(jìn)行界定,介紹并分析了國內(nèi)外科學(xué)探究能力評(píng)價(jià)方式及評(píng)價(jià)體系,為研究提供了理論基礎(chǔ)。(2)實(shí)證研究：本研究的核心部分。本研究結(jié)合“基本要素分析法”,確定了科學(xué)的評(píng)價(jià)體系,有著明確的評(píng)價(jià)目標(biāo),并結(jié)合工作單及紙筆測試兩種評(píng)價(jià)方式,對(duì)南京地區(qū)兩所高校大學(xué)生的科學(xué)探究能力進(jìn)行考察。根據(jù)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)：目前大學(xué)生具備了基本的探究能力；不同學(xué)生之間能力發(fā)展水平不同,兩種方式下：校際、高中分科、本科專業(yè)三個(gè)因素上差異均顯著,戶籍因素上差異均不顯著。性別因素在工作單方式下差異不顯著,紙筆測試方式下差異顯著；整體上看,工作單得分高于紙筆測試,兩種方式的結(jié)合使用可以很好地對(duì)大學(xué)生的科學(xué)探究能力進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。本研究針對(duì)發(fā)現(xiàn)的問題,從高校、教師與評(píng)價(jià)者、學(xué)生三方面提出了相應(yīng)的改進(jìn)建議：高校要調(diào)整課程設(shè)置、加強(qiáng)各院系合作；教師要因材施教、鼓勵(lì)男女合作、加強(qiáng)師生互動(dòng)；評(píng)價(jià)者采用合適評(píng)測體系科學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)；學(xué)生要對(duì)自身的科學(xué)探究能力水平有著清晰的了解,及時(shí)學(xué)習(xí)并掌握相關(guān)能力提升的方法。
[Abstract]:From the beginning in late twentieth Century, led by the United States government began the reform of science education, governments and relevant international organizations to evaluate more and more attention to the evaluation of the students' scientific inquiry ability. And through the early reading of related literature, the research object in our country on the scientific inquiry ability mainly focus on primary and secondary school students, according to the study of College Students' scientific inquiry the ability is relatively poor, and a single evaluation method. This research chooses Nanjing as a key university and a college freshman, to evaluate the abilities of science inquiry. This study mainly includes the following two aspects: (1) theoretical research: defines the related concepts, introduces and analyzes the domestic and foreign scientific inquiry ability evaluation methods and evaluation system, provides a theoretical basis for the study. (2) an empirical study: the core part of this study. This study combined " The factor analysis method, to determine the scientific evaluation system, a clear evaluation target, combined with the single and pen test two kinds of evaluation methods, to investigate two university students in Nanjing area of scientific inquiry ability. According to the findings of the research: at present, college students have the basic ability of inquiry; ability development among the students of different, in two ways: schools, high school division, undergraduate three factors were significant difference between household factors, the differences were not significant. The gender factor in a single way under different pen and paper test methods showed significant differences; overall, single scored higher than the pen test combining the two ways, can be very good on College Students' scientific inquiry ability evaluation. This study aimed at the problem of discovery, from universities, teachers and evaluation, put forward the corresponding improvement of students in three areas Suggestion: universities should adjust the curriculum, strengthen the cooperation of each department; teachers should teach students in accordance with their aptitude, to encourage cooperation between men and women, to strengthen teacher-student interaction; evaluation of the appropriate evaluation system of scientific evaluation; students of their abilities of science inquiry has a clear understanding, learning and mastering methods in improving the ability.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：G642

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 夏小俊;顧乃景;柏毅;;TIMSS 2015與NAEP 2015科學(xué)評(píng)估框架的比較研究[J];考試研究;2016年01期

2 謝紹平;董秀紅;;國內(nèi)科學(xué)探究能力評(píng)價(jià)研究的現(xiàn)狀及展望[J];教學(xué)研究;2012年01期

3 鐘媚;;英國APU科學(xué)探究能力測評(píng)及其啟示[J];外國中小學(xué)教育;2010年11期

4 李雪梅;范春玲;;運(yùn)用“探究日志”評(píng)價(jià)中學(xué)生的科學(xué)探究能力[J];物理教學(xué)探討;2008年07期

5 羅國忠;;基于紙筆測驗(yàn)的科學(xué)探究能力評(píng)價(jià)的有效性研究[J];上海教育科研;2007年10期

6 羅國忠;;科學(xué)探究能力的評(píng)價(jià)方法[J];教育科學(xué);2007年03期

7 黃t，

本文編號(hào)：1385856