本文選題：食胎盤(pán)行為 + 羊胎素療法　； 參考：《科普研究》2016年05期

【摘要】：食用胎盤(pán)及羊胎素"活細(xì)胞療法"的流行伴隨著爭(zhēng)議,支持方與反對(duì)方給出的依據(jù)主要涉及"科學(xué)"和"歷史"兩個(gè)方面。梳理目前的科學(xué)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),食用胎盤(pán)的療效與危害均無(wú)嚴(yán)格確鑿的科學(xué)證據(jù);羊胎素與"干細(xì)胞治療"全無(wú)關(guān)聯(lián),羊胎素"活細(xì)胞療法"也未得到監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)認(rèn)可。中國(guó)古代掩埋胎盤(pán)較食用胎盤(pán)的歷史更為悠久,且胎盤(pán)入藥自古便存在反對(duì)聲音,因此歷史悠久不能作為療效證據(jù)。中國(guó)悠久的養(yǎng)生觀念、養(yǎng)生產(chǎn)品的高需求和高利潤(rùn),以及科學(xué)研究的缺失所留下的認(rèn)知空間,導(dǎo)致此類產(chǎn)品在缺乏科學(xué)依據(jù)和歷史依據(jù)的情況下仍然流行。
[Abstract]:The prevalence of "live cell therapy" in placenta and sheep foetus is controversial. The basis given by supporters and opponents mainly involves two aspects: "science" and "history". Combing the current scientific research, we found that there is no strict scientific evidence of the efficacy and harm of eating placenta, there is no relationship between sheep fetal hormone and stem cell therapy, and sheep fetal hormone living cell therapy has not been approved by the regulatory body. The placenta buried in ancient China has a longer history than the edible placenta, and the placenta medicine has been opposed since ancient times, so it can not be used as evidence of curative effect for a long time. China's long concept of health preservation, the high demand and high profit of health products, and the lack of scientific research leave the cognitive space for this kind of products, resulting in the lack of scientific basis and historical basis of this kind of products are still popular.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)科學(xué)院大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【分類號(hào)】：R45

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 U.Wedeg釨rtner;S.Popovych;J.Yamamura;H.Kooijman;G.Adam;郭雪梅;;羊胎腦缺氧的3.0T與1.5T MRI ΔR_2~*的對(duì)照研究[J];國(guó)際醫(yī)學(xué)放射學(xué)雜志;2009年05期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 熊莉;趙博文;黎鵬;;二維超聲應(yīng)變成像評(píng)價(jià)慢性貧血羊胎心心肌功能及其對(duì)急性后負(fù)荷增加的反應(yīng)[A];2011年浙江省超聲醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2111753