《喬家大院》是一部以真人真事為依托的歷史小說。小說講述了一代巨商喬致庸在商業(yè)上取得巨大成功在感情上遭遇坎坷波瀾壯闊的一生。小說里絕大部分篇幅由對話組成,而對話是體現(xiàn)研究人物性格的重要條件之一。目前有很多關(guān)于人物對話塑造人物性格的研究,但是大部分是文學領(lǐng)域的研究,很少有人研究人物對話過程中違反合作原則產(chǎn)生會話含義這一現(xiàn)象是如何幫助塑造人物性格的。本文采取語用學理論與文學研究相結(jié)合的方法,將一般（無會話含義的）對話對人物性格塑造的作用與與會話含義對人物性格塑造的作用進行對比分析,目的是突出會話含義在塑造人物性格時的特殊作用,以及會話含義對小說創(chuàng)作產(chǎn)生的影響。本文采用了數(shù)據(jù)分析法以及定性分析法與定量分析法相結(jié)合的研究方法對小說中的對話進行了研究。本文對小說中出現(xiàn)的五位主要人物的對話進行了對比分析。其中三位女性分別是江雪瑛、陸玉菡、曹氏,兩位男性分別是喬致庸和孫茂才。這五位人物引導著小說的發(fā)展并且各自有大量的對話可以進行研究對比。本文首先從一般對話分析人物的主導性格和非主導性格,通過列舉經(jīng)典對話揭示對話中隱藏的人物性格。其次本文選取五位角色違反合作原則時的經(jīng)典對話,分析對話中的會話含義以及它是... 

【文章來源】：華中師范大學湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：72 頁

【學位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgement
摘要
Abstract
1. Introduction
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Significance of the research
    1.3 Outline of the thesis
2. Literature Review
    2.1 Studies of Qiao's Family Compund
    2.2 Studies of conversational implicature
    2.3 Studies of literary pragmatics
3. Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Cooperative principle
        3.1.1 Grice's four maxims
        3.1.2 Flouting of four maxims
    3.2 Conversational implicature
        3.2.1 Generalized implicature and particularized implicature
        3.2.2 Standard implicature and non-stsndard implicature
        3.2.3 Properties of conversational implicature
        3.2.4 Conversational implicature and conventional implicature
    3.3 Charecterization
        3.3.1 Predominant character
            3.3.1.1 Identification of predominant character
            3.3.1.2 Manifestation of predominant character
        3.3.2 Non-predominant character
        3.3.3 Characterization in conversation
4. Characterization through Conversational Implicature
    4.1 Characterization through conversation without conversaional implicature
        4.1.1 Predominant and non-predominant character of three females
            4.1.1.1 Character of Jiang Xueying
            4.1.1.2 Character of Lu Yuhan
            4.1.1.3 Character of Mrs.Cao
        4.1.2 Predominant and Don-predominant character of two males
            4.1.2.1 Character of Qiao Zhiyong
            4.1.2.2 Character of Sun Maocai
    4.2 Characterization through conversational implicature
        4.2.1 Flouting of quality maxim
            4.2.1.1 Offering false information
            4.2.1.2 Offering information lacking evidence
        4.2.2 Flouting of relation maxim
    4.3 Comparison of two kinds of characterization
        4.3.1 Quantity comparison
        4.3.2 Quality comparison
    4.4 Pragmatic functions of characterization through conversational implicature innovels
        4.4.1 Being vivid
        4.4.2 Being concise
        4.4.3 Being persuasive
5. Conclusion
    5.1 Major findings of the research
    5.2 Implications for future studies
    5.3 Limitations and suggestions
Bibliography



本文編號：3437332