本文選題：國(guó)故　切入點(diǎn)：新知　出處：《求索》2017年09期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)20年代,在"整理國(guó)故"的思想風(fēng)潮影響下,文言與白話,舊學(xué)與新知的斗爭(zhēng)更為激烈,并從思想界蔓延到了教育領(lǐng)域。以上海澄衷中學(xué)國(guó)文會(huì)考事件為導(dǎo)火索,以《學(xué)生雜志》編輯楊賢江與澄衷中學(xué)校長(zhǎng)曹慕管的論爭(zhēng)為起點(diǎn),吸引了陳望道、邵力子、曹聚仁諸多人物的參與,從而爆發(fā)了持續(xù)將近月余的有關(guān)"國(guó)故毒"的大論戰(zhàn)。雙方就中學(xué)教育與國(guó)故的關(guān)系等問(wèn)題往復(fù)辨難,只是由于意氣之爭(zhēng)超越了理性探討,使得這場(chǎng)論戰(zhàn)最終未能取得理論的突破,然而作為新舊文化論爭(zhēng)的縮影仍不失其歷史意義。
[Abstract]:In 1920s, the struggle between classical Chinese and vernacular language, old learning and new knowledge became more intense under the influence of the ideological trend of "sorting out the national heritage", and spread from the ideological field to the field of education. Starting from the controversy between Yang Xianjiang, editor of "student magazine", and Cao Muguan, principal of Cheng-jin Middle School, it has attracted the participation of a lot of figures from Chen Wangdao, Shao Lizi, and Shao Lizi. As a result, there has been a great controversy over the past month or so on the relationship between secondary school education and national heritage. It is only because the argument of sentiment transcends the rational discussion that the two sides have debated over and over again on the relationship between secondary education and national heritage. However, as a microcosm of the old and new cultures, it still has its historical significance.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué);
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“民國(guó)話體文學(xué)批評(píng)文獻(xiàn)整理與研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):15ZDB079) 第61批博士后面上資助項(xiàng)目“民國(guó)舊體詩(shī)社的地理分布”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):2017M611433)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I206.6
，

本文編號(hào)：1640084