文與政之間:西漢今古文學之爭的另一種解讀——兼論爭立“古文”學并非始于劉歆
發(fā)布時間:2018-01-02 08:29
本文關鍵詞:文與政之間:西漢今古文學之爭的另一種解讀——兼論爭立“古文”學并非始于劉歆 出處:《河南師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版)》2017年02期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:西漢今古文學之爭的性質(zhì)問題歷來眾說紛紜,學者或視之為學術義理之爭或視之為利祿之爭。細讀史料發(fā)現(xiàn)這樁學術公案背后有著錯綜復雜的學術與政治背景。劉歆的初衷是為了解決六藝經(jīng)典散佚缺失導致"道術"分裂的問題,但卻卷入了漢哀帝與博士官學系統(tǒng)出身的儒學士大夫集團之間的政治斗爭。儒學士大夫集團欲借助壟斷經(jīng)典的解釋權,牢牢占據(jù)道德制高點,對漢哀帝的一系列政治舉措和意圖進行批判和限制,哀帝則欲借增立"古文"于學官之機建立符合自身利益的新"官學",從而打破博士官學系統(tǒng)對"真理"的壟斷。又,學界歷來以劉歆建議增立"古文"學于學官為"古文"學派崛起之始,文章認為爭立"古文"學于學官早有先聲,始于漢成帝時期博士平當為由先秦史料匯聚而成的《樂記》請立學官之事。
[Abstract]:Nature of the Western Han Dynasty of ancient and modern literature contend for has always been regarded as scholars or Public opinions are divergent., academic argumentation of the dispute or as Cyril dispute. Read the historical data found behind the pile of academic and political background with academic koan. Liu Hsin's perplexing intention is to solve the classic six scattered lack of "Taoism" division problem but in between, the emperor and the official school system from Dr. Confucianism bureaucrats group politics. Confucianism bureaucrats group wants to use the power of interpretation of the classic monopoly, firmly occupy the moral high ground, a series of policies on the emperor's intention to criticize and treatment initiatives and restrictions, is trying to take advantage of emperor AI increase "Ancient Literature" in the new government official machine "learning" the interests of the establishment, so as to break the system of doctor officer "truth". It has always been a monopoly, Liu Hsin proposal to increase the "classical" learning from the government for the "classical" rise of academic school At the beginning, the dispute of the "classical" learning from the government had first began in the Han Emperor period, pre Qin historical grounds when Dr. Ping brought together < Music > please stand at last thing.
【作者單位】: 國家行政學院法學教研部;東北大學文法學院;
【分類號】:I206.2
【正文快照】: 漢哀帝建平元年(前6)劉歆向哀帝建言,欲將《左氏春秋》及《毛詩》《逸禮》《古文尚書》皆列于學官,遂拉開了所謂經(jīng)學史上著名的“今古文”之爭的序幕。關于此次爭論的性質(zhì)問題,傳統(tǒng)研究或認為是學術觀點之爭[1]5,或認為是雙方的利祿之爭[2]。然而,細讀史料發(fā)現(xiàn)這些觀點都有簡
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前1條
1 楊天宇;略論漢代今古文經(jīng)學的斗爭與融合[J];鄭州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年02期
【共引文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 曹海琴;張立克;;文與政之間:西漢今古文學之爭的另一種解讀——兼論爭立“古文”學并非始于劉歆[J];河南師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2017年02期
2 范常喜;;鄭玄注《儀禮》形訛古文新證九則[J];孔子研究;2014年04期
3 壽佳琦;;簡論兩漢經(jīng)學的發(fā)展演變[J];文史博覽(理論);2013年02期
4 陳豪s,
本文編號:1368452
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/gudaiwenxuelunwen/1368452.html