管理層討論與分析信息披露的有用性研究
[Abstract]:With the development of capital market, traditional financial statements can not meet the needs of investors. Investors want more non-financial and forward-looking information about the company. As this demand intensifies, management discussion and analysis of (Management Discussion and Analysis, (hereinafter referred to as MDA) emerge as the times require. MDA provides information that traditional financial statements and their notes cannot provide. Giving investors the opportunity to see through the company's economic nature through the eyes of the management, meeting the higher requirements of investors for the relevance of information and forward-looking (Li Changqing, 2005). SEC in the prospectus preparation and preparation guidelines issued on December 9, 1965, formally put forward the MDA.2002 year World Communications and other accounting scandals, MDA has become an important corrective measures taken by SEC in response to the Enron accounting scandal. MDA is also considered by Colleen Sayther, president of the International Association of Financial executives, to be one of the top 10 financial reporting issues that finance executives should pay attention to in 2004. In view of the importance of MDA, China also formally introduced the MDA information disclosure system in 2002. After the significant revision of the Annual report Standard in 2005 and 2007, the contents and methods of MDA disclosure have been greatly enriched. However, the research on MDA information disclosure in Chinese academic circles is much weaker than that in foreign countries because of the late start time. Therefore, it is of great significance to do empirical research on MDA information disclosure, especially on the usefulness of MDA information disclosure, which is directly related to the necessity and rationality of disclosure of MDA information. Firstly, this paper reviews and combs the existing research literature on MDA information disclosure. Based on the previous studies, combined with the relevant theory of MDA information disclosure, this paper makes a theoretical analysis on the usefulness of MDA information disclosure. Secondly, the current situation of MDA information disclosure in annual report of listed companies in China is analyzed. The results show that the overall disclosure of MDA information in listed companies in China is not enough, the individual disclosure is very different, the historical information is more important than the forward-looking information. Lack of voluntary disclosure of information. Finally, the paper makes an empirical test on the usefulness of MDA information disclosure, which reflects the usefulness of MDA information disclosure from two aspects: the predictive role of MDA and the short-term market effect. The results show that the MDA information disclosure of listed companies in China has a predictive effect and a short-term market effect, but different information has different predictive and market effects. In short, the MDA information disclosed by listed companies is useful to investors. The conclusion supports the necessity of MDA information disclosure and provides important empirical evidence for China to establish a more perfect MDA information disclosure system. Finally, based on the results of empirical analysis on the current situation of MDA information disclosure in China, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve and perfect the MDA information disclosure of listed companies in China, points out the limitations of this study and puts forward a prospect for further research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:東華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:F233;F832.51;F224
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 巫升柱;;自愿披露水平與股票流動(dòng)性的實(shí)證研究——基于中國上市公司年度報(bào)告的經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2007年08期
2 陳國輝;韓海文;;自愿性信息披露的價(jià)值效應(yīng)檢驗(yàn)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2010年05期
3 張海霞;;上市公司年報(bào)“管理層討論與分析”信息披露現(xiàn)狀與對(duì)策——基于IT行業(yè)的實(shí)例[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2007年08期
4 梁杰;王倩;;上市公司年度報(bào)告“管理層討論與分析”披露質(zhì)量分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2009年08期
5 劉家松;王惠芳;;公司管理層討論與分析信息披露的影響因素——基于深滬223家上市公司經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)的探討[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào).西部論壇;2006年02期
6 范龍振,張子剛;深圳股票市場的弱有效性[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期
7 薛爽;肖澤忠;潘妙麗;;管理層討論與分析是否提供了有用信息?——基于虧損上市公司的實(shí)證探索[J];管理世界;2010年05期
8 李常青;王毅輝;張鳳展;;上市公司“管理層討論與分析”披露質(zhì)量影響因素研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2008年04期
9 宋頌興,,金偉根;上海股市市場有效實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;1995年04期
10 俞喬;市場有效、周期異常與股價(jià)波動(dòng)——對(duì)上海、深圳股票市場的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1994年09期
本文編號(hào):2373003
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/zhqtouz/2373003.html