本文選題：流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn) + 流動(dòng)性溢價(jià)�。� 參考：《山西大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文致力于研究貨幣狀況對(duì)股票市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其溢價(jià)的影響,論證過(guò)程將貨幣狀況、市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和股票收益率聯(lián)系了起來(lái)。 本文比較了價(jià)差指標(biāo)、價(jià)格影響力指標(biāo)、零天數(shù)指標(biāo)等多種流動(dòng)性測(cè)量方法,最終選定了Amihud (2002)的流動(dòng)性測(cè)度指標(biāo)來(lái)衡量我國(guó)股票市場(chǎng)的流動(dòng)性。貨幣狀況則分別選用"Shibor隔夜”和“一年期貸款利率”兩個(gè)利率指標(biāo)進(jìn)行劃分,根據(jù)各自不同的利率走勢(shì),劃分為擴(kuò)張和緊縮狀態(tài)。 Acharya和Pedersen(2005)以及Brunnermeier和Pedersen(2009)指出：股票市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性變化影響股票收益率和流動(dòng)性溢價(jià),即流動(dòng)性溢價(jià)的變化是由股票市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性變化引起的。因此,本文認(rèn)為流動(dòng)性溢價(jià)的時(shí)變性是由于投資者融資條件的變化,即貨幣政策的波動(dòng)引起的；具體的作用機(jī)制為貨幣政策的波動(dòng)首先影響了股票市場(chǎng)的總流動(dòng)性,進(jìn)而影響股票的流動(dòng)性溢價(jià)。 本文首先研究了貨幣狀況對(duì)股票市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的影響,模仿Pastor和Stambaugh(2003)的方法,將股票市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性的新息ε作為流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子。運(yùn)用組合分析法、向量自回歸(VAR)和脈沖響應(yīng)函數(shù)(IRF)研究得出：在貨幣狀況擴(kuò)張期間,由于融資條件的寬松,市場(chǎng)參與者的資本可獲得性增加,從而股票市場(chǎng)的流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)減小,整個(gè)市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性得以改善；而貨幣狀況緊縮期間,市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加,整個(gè)市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性降低。 在確定了貨幣狀況與股票市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性存在關(guān)聯(lián)之后,本文繼續(xù)研究了貨幣狀況對(duì)流動(dòng)性溢價(jià)的影響。采用近似于Fama-French (1993)構(gòu)造規(guī)模因子(SMB)和價(jià)值因子(HML)的方法,構(gòu)造了L-H組合來(lái)表示流動(dòng)性的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溢價(jià)。同樣運(yùn)用組合分析法、向量自回歸(VAR)和脈沖響應(yīng)函數(shù)(IRF)研究得出： 第一,在寬松貨幣狀況下,市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性得到改善,對(duì)于市場(chǎng)參與者,提供流動(dòng)性的成本以及持有流動(dòng)性較差證券的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和成本都降低了,投資者持有流動(dòng)性較差的股票所要求的收益率溢價(jià)減少,即流動(dòng)性溢價(jià)降低；投資者愿意持有流動(dòng)性差的股票,并且對(duì)流動(dòng)性差的股票增加投資,使得流動(dòng)性低的股票價(jià)格相對(duì)流動(dòng)性高的股票價(jià)格漲幅更大,進(jìn)而L-H組合收益率顯著擴(kuò)大。 第二,融資條件受限時(shí),流動(dòng)性對(duì)投資者的影響較高,市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性和融資狀況的惡化,使得投資者對(duì)于持有流動(dòng)性差的證券所承擔(dān)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和成本增加,因此投資者增加對(duì)持有非流動(dòng)性股票所要求的收益率溢價(jià),即流動(dòng)性溢價(jià)增加；投資者被迫放棄在流動(dòng)性差的股票上的頭寸,轉(zhuǎn)而持有更流動(dòng)的資產(chǎn),使得流動(dòng)性低的股票價(jià)格相對(duì)流動(dòng)性高的股票價(jià)格跌幅更大,進(jìn)而L-H組合收益率減小。
[Abstract]:This paper is devoted to the study of the influence of monetary situation on liquidity risk and its premium in stock market. The process of demonstration links monetary situation, market liquidity risk and stock yield. This paper compares a variety of liquidity measurement methods, such as price difference index, price influence index, zero day index and so on. Finally, the liquidity measurement index of Amihud / 2002) is selected to measure the liquidity of China's stock market. The monetary situation is divided into "Shibor overnight" and "one-year loan rate" two interest rate indicators, according to their different interest rate trend, divided into expansion and contraction state. Acharya and Pedersen 2005) and Brunnermeier and Pedersenn 2009) pointed out that the change of stock market liquidity affects the stock yield and liquidity premium, that is, the change of liquidity premium is caused by the change of stock market liquidity. Therefore, this paper holds that the time-variant of liquidity premium is caused by the change of investor's financing conditions, that is, the fluctuation of monetary policy, and the specific mechanism is that the fluctuation of monetary policy first affects the total liquidity of stock market. And then affect the liquidity premium of the stock. This paper first studies the influence of monetary situation on liquidity risk of stock market, and takes the innovation 蔚 of stock market liquidity as the liquidity risk factor by imitating the method of Pastor and Stambaugher 2003. By using combination analysis, vector autoregressive analysis (VAR) and impulse response function (IRFF), it is concluded that during the period of monetary expansion, the capital availability of market participants increases due to the loose financing conditions, thus the liquidity risk of the stock market decreases. Liquidity improved throughout the market, while liquidity risks increased and liquidity fell throughout the market during tight monetary conditions. After determining the relationship between monetary conditions and stock market liquidity, this paper continues to study the influence of monetary conditions on liquidity premiums. The L-H combination is constructed to represent the risk premium of liquidity by using the method of constructing scale factor (Fama-French) and value factor (Fama-French) similar to that of Fama-French / 1993). By using combinatorial analysis, vector autoregressive VARs and impulse response function IRFs, it is concluded that: First, in the context of loose money, market liquidity has improved, and the cost of providing liquidity, as well as the risk and cost of holding illiquid securities, has been reduced for market participants. Investors are willing to hold less liquid stocks and invest more in less liquid stocks. As a result, the low liquidity stock price increases more than that of the high liquidity stock price, and the yield of the L H portfolio expands significantly. Second, when the financing conditions are restricted, liquidity has a higher impact on investors, and the deterioration of market liquidity and financing conditions increases the risk and cost of holding illiquid securities. As a result, investors have increased the yield premium required for holding illiquid stocks, or liquidity premiums; investors have been forced to abandon positions in illiquid stocks for more liquid assets. As a result, the low-liquidity stock price is lower than the high-liquidity stock price, and then the L-H portfolio yield decreases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F832.51;F822;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 佟孟華;余世奎;HAN Shuang;;股市系統(tǒng)流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溢價(jià)動(dòng)態(tài)實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2010年01期

2 儲(chǔ)小俊;劉思峰;;基于Markov區(qū)制轉(zhuǎn)換的流動(dòng)性溢價(jià)[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2007年10期

3 梁麗珍;孔東民;;中國(guó)股市的流動(dòng)性指標(biāo)定價(jià)研究[J];管理科學(xué);2008年03期

4 何榮天;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)收益對(duì)應(yīng)論與中國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)非流動(dòng)溢價(jià)的實(shí)證分析[J];南開(kāi)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年04期

5 儲(chǔ)小俊;劉思峰;;貨幣政策、市場(chǎng)狀態(tài)對(duì)中國(guó)股市微觀流動(dòng)性影響的實(shí)證分析[J];數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)與管理;2008年03期

6 趙偉雄;何建敏;賈萬(wàn)敬;;我國(guó)期銅市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性與貨幣供給關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[J];數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)與管理;2010年04期

7 丁煥強(qiáng);陶永誠(chéng);;貨幣政策與市場(chǎng)流動(dòng)性[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2011年01期

8 楊朝軍;王靈芝;;流動(dòng)性水平、流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)對(duì)資產(chǎn)收益的影響——來(lái)自滬深股市的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];系統(tǒng)管理學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黃峰;中國(guó)股票市場(chǎng)的流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其溢價(jià)效應(yīng)研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1938021