發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-11 22:39

  本文選題：股票市場(chǎng) + 效用函數(shù)��； 參考：《南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文主要研究了中國(guó)股票市場(chǎng)對(duì)投資者、上市公司以及政府這三個(gè)股市主要參與方的福利狀況進(jìn)行了分析。 對(duì)投資者的福利分析，我們主要通過(guò)兩個(gè)方面來(lái)進(jìn)行研究。首先是基于財(cái)富效用空間的福利分析，主要通過(guò)雙曲絕對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡（Hyperbolic Absolute RiskAversion,簡(jiǎn)稱HARA）效用函數(shù)推導(dǎo)出與遞增風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡者、固定絕對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡者及遞減風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡者相對(duì)應(yīng)的代表性效用函數(shù)，來(lái)分析股價(jià)漲跌對(duì)其福利狀況的影響。對(duì)此研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，對(duì)于遞增絕對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡型投資者來(lái)說(shuō)，如果由于股價(jià)上漲而使得浮動(dòng)財(cái)富增加，同時(shí)股價(jià)下跌概率加大時(shí)，若投資者不減少風(fēng)險(xiǎn)資產(chǎn)投資額，即獲利了結(jié)，那么將會(huì)使該型投資者的效用水平下降，福利狀況變差，反之,其福利狀況則會(huì)得到改善。遞減風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡者的情況與遞增風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡者的情況相反，固定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡者的福利狀況則受股價(jià)波動(dòng)影響較小。其次是從基于期望收益-方差空間的分析中發(fā)現(xiàn)牛市中投資者整體的福利狀況變好，而熊市中投資者整體的福利狀況則會(huì)惡化。 對(duì)上市公司的福利分析是通過(guò)融資體系和融資結(jié)構(gòu)的變化來(lái)進(jìn)行的。發(fā)現(xiàn)銀行壟斷資金供給將使得企業(yè)的融資成本加大，企業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)福利減少，而股市的發(fā)展使得融資渠道多元化，能夠改善企業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)福利。但問(wèn)題是企業(yè)要想在股票市場(chǎng)進(jìn)行最大化的融資，從而使其從股市獲得最大化的福利效應(yīng)也是不可能的，而是要受到客觀經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢(shì)和投資者投資意愿制約的。 對(duì)政府的福利效應(yīng)分析結(jié)果表明，股市的融資功能是GDP增長(zhǎng)的Granger原因，說(shuō)明股市在融資轉(zhuǎn)化為投資從而助推經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方面確實(shí)起到了積極作用，，這一結(jié)論也從我們以C-D模型為基礎(chǔ)的具體數(shù)量分析中得到了驗(yàn)證。另外，我們的研究表明股票市場(chǎng)并沒(méi)有對(duì)消費(fèi)產(chǎn)生顯著的影響，股市的財(cái)富效應(yīng)不顯著，政府并沒(méi)有從股市拉動(dòng)消費(fèi)方面獲得福利。政府從股市中得到的最直接的經(jīng)濟(jì)福利是股市印花稅，1993年至2010年我國(guó)股民累積上繳印花稅達(dá)到6411.79億元。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly studies the welfare situation of the three main participants in Chinese stock market: investors, listed companies and the government. To the investor's welfare analysis, we mainly through two aspects to carry on the research. Firstly, based on the welfare analysis of wealth utility space, the hyperbolic Absolute risk aversion (HARAA) utility function is used to derive and increase the risk aversion. The representative utility function of absolute risk aversion and decreasing risk aversion is fixed to analyze the effect of stock price fluctuation on its welfare. In this study, it is found that for incremental absolute risk-averse investors, if the floating wealth increases due to the rise of the stock price and the probability of stock price decline increases, if the investors do not reduce the investment in risky assets, they will take profits. Then the utility level of this type of investors will be reduced, welfare conditions will become worse, conversely, their welfare conditions will be improved. Diminishing risk aversion is the opposite of increasing risk aversion, and the welfare of fixed risk averse is less affected by stock price volatility. Secondly, from the analysis based on expected income-variance space, it is found that the overall welfare status of investors in bull market is better, while that of investors in bear market will deteriorate. The welfare analysis of listed companies is carried out through the change of financing system and financing structure. It is found that the supply of bank monopoly funds will increase the financing cost of enterprises and reduce the economic welfare of enterprises, while the development of stock market will make financing channels diversified and improve the economic welfare of enterprises. However, the problem is that it is impossible for enterprises to maximize their financing in stock market so as to maximize their welfare effect from the stock market, but are restricted by the objective economic situation and investors' investment intention. The analysis of the welfare effect of the government shows that the financing function of the stock market is the Granger reason for the growth of GDP, which indicates that the stock market has played a positive role in transforming financing into investment and thus promoting economic development. This conclusion is also verified by our quantitative analysis based on C-D model. In addition, our research shows that the stock market does not have a significant impact on consumption, the stock market wealth effect is not significant, and the government does not benefit from the stock market driving consumption. The most direct economic benefit that the government receives from the stock market is the stamp duty on the stock market. From 1993 to 2010, the accumulated stamp duty paid by Chinese shareholders reached 641.179 billion yuan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓其恒;李俊青;;金融深化對(duì)個(gè)體行為及其福利的影響分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2010年06期

2 胡關(guān)金;中國(guó)證券業(yè)及上市公司對(duì)GDP貢獻(xiàn)的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年03期

3 胡華;胡若;;雙曲型絕對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡函數(shù)的最優(yōu)消費(fèi)與投資組合的顯示解[J];上海理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

4 段軍山;股市財(cái)富效應(yīng)的多重解釋——及對(duì)我國(guó)股市財(cái)富效應(yīng)弱化的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年04期

5 孟慶春,劉家壯,安起光;對(duì)偶理論在福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中的應(yīng)用[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)數(shù)學(xué);2001年02期

6 蔣殿春;楊超;盛明泉;;火車票定價(jià)與社會(huì)福利[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年12期

7 林細(xì)細(xì);龔六堂;;中國(guó)債務(wù)的福利損失分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年01期

8 李銳;朱喜;;農(nóng)戶金融抑制及其福利損失的計(jì)量分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年02期

9 陳彥斌;馬莉莉;;中國(guó)通貨膨脹的福利成本研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年04期

10 姚斌;;人民幣匯率制度選擇的研究——基于福利的數(shù)量分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 姚明霞;西方理論福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究[D];中國(guó)人民大學(xué);2001年

2 劉建江;股票市場(chǎng)財(cái)富效應(yīng)研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王敏;論我國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的因果關(guān)系[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院;2001年

2 陳梅;中國(guó)股票市場(chǎng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)相互作用機(jī)制及實(shí)證研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2002年

3 薛芳;庇古福利經(jīng)濟(jì)倫理思想探析[D];江西師范大學(xué);2005年

4 上官厚兵;福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)述評(píng)[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

本文編號(hào)：1875950