本文關(guān)鍵詞： 最終控制人 制度環(huán)境 過度投資　出處：《合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：由于目前我國工業(yè)化尚未完成，所以在可預(yù)見的未來我國可能繼續(xù)保持高投資率的狀況。但是高投資率和經(jīng)濟飛速增長的背后，，卻存在著重復(fù)建設(shè)和過度投資現(xiàn)象。一方面這種過度投資降低了企業(yè)的價值，影響企業(yè)的成長；另一方面而言，大量投資過度會使得經(jīng)濟過熱導(dǎo)致生產(chǎn)能力過剩，阻礙我國經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展。 隨著現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度的建立，我國逐步實現(xiàn)了政企分離、科學(xué)管理，以及國有企業(yè)股份制改革的推進，但是企業(yè)中仍然存在著嚴重的代理問題。所以研究中國上市公司的投資效率問題必須結(jié)合控制人背景和制度環(huán)境進行綜合考慮。制度環(huán)境往往會影響代理人的理性行為，而公司的投資決策直接受到代理人的行為影響，從而產(chǎn)生了非效率投資。所以將最終控制人背景和制度環(huán)境對過度投資的影響納入研究拓寬了現(xiàn)有的企業(yè)投資研究視角。 本文的主要研究內(nèi)容就是在我國特有的制度環(huán)境下，比較不同最終控制人的投資效率問題，嘗試著用新制度經(jīng)濟學(xué)的理論來解釋作用機理。具體利用Richardson(2006)模型測算得出樣本的投資過度和投資不足，并且按照上市公司的最終控制人性質(zhì)將樣本公司劃分為三個組別，同時引入制度環(huán)境衡量指標(biāo)。在此基礎(chǔ)之上，對制度環(huán)境與我國上市公司過度投資行為的相關(guān)性進行實證研究。結(jié)果表明：政府控制的上市公司比私人控制的上市公司發(fā)生過度投資的傾向更高，特別是地方政府控制的上市公司；制度環(huán)境的改善減輕了上市公司過度投資的嚴重程度；政府控制的上市公司中過度投資行為受政府干預(yù)的影響程度要高于私人控制的上市公司受影響程度，受金融環(huán)境影響的程度小于私人控制的上市公司受影響程度，受法律環(huán)境的影響程度與私人控制的上市公司不存在較大的差異。
[Abstract]:As China's industrialization has not yet been completed, China may continue to maintain a high investment rate for the foreseeable future. But behind the high investment rate and rapid economic growth, On the one hand, such overinvestment reduces the value of enterprises and affects their growth; on the other hand, overinvestment can cause overheating of the economy and lead to overcapacity. Hinder the development of our economy. With the establishment of modern enterprise system, China has gradually realized the separation of government and enterprises, scientific management, and the promotion of the reform of state-owned enterprises' stock system. However, there are still serious agency problems in enterprises. Therefore, in order to study the investment efficiency of listed companies in China, it is necessary to consider comprehensively the background of the controlling person and the institutional environment, which often affects the rational behavior of the agents. The investment decision of the company is directly influenced by the behavior of the agent, which leads to the inefficient investment. Therefore, the influence of the background of the ultimate controller and the institutional environment on the overinvestment is included in the study, which widens the existing perspective of the enterprise investment research. The main research content of this paper is to compare the investment efficiency of different ultimate controllers in the unique institutional environment of our country. This paper tries to use the theory of new institutional economics to explain the mechanism of action. The model of Richardson's 2006) is used to calculate the overinvestment and underinvestment of the sample, and the sample companies are divided into three groups according to the nature of the ultimate controller of the listed company. At the same time, the system environment measurement index is introduced. This paper makes an empirical study on the correlation between the institutional environment and the over-investment behavior of listed companies in China. The results show that the government-controlled listed companies tend to overinvest more than the privately controlled listed companies. Especially the listed companies controlled by the local government, the improvement of the system environment reduces the serious degree of excessive investment of the listed companies. The excessive investment behavior of the listed companies controlled by the government is affected more by government intervention than by the private listed companies, and the degree of financial environment is less than that of the private controlled listed companies. There is no significant difference between the degree of influence of the legal environment and the private-controlled listed companies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：F275;F832.51;F224

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉懷珍,歐陽令南;中國上市公司效率悖論:提出與解讀[J];財經(jīng)研究;2004年08期

2 唐松;楊勇;孫錚;;金融發(fā)展、債務(wù)治理與公司價值——來自中國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];財經(jīng)研究;2009年06期

3 王軍;;現(xiàn)代西方產(chǎn)權(quán)理論與我國產(chǎn)權(quán)制度構(gòu)建[J];產(chǎn)權(quán)導(dǎo)刊;2007年10期

4 李延喜;陳克兢;龍靜;;制度環(huán)境與過度投資——來自中國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟管理;2010年08期

5 文宏;融資偏好與融資效率——對我國上市公司的實證研究[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟科學(xué);1999年06期

6 韓立巖,蔡紅艷;我國資本配置效率及其與金融市場關(guān)系評價研究[J];管理世界;2002年01期

7 陳信元;黃俊;;政府干預(yù)、多元化經(jīng)營與公司業(yè)績[J];管理世界;2007年01期

8 魏明海;柳建華;;國企分紅、治理因素與過度投資[J];管理世界;2007年04期

9 楊華軍;胡奕明;;制度環(huán)境與自由現(xiàn)金流的過度投資[J];管理世界;2007年09期

10 程仲鳴;夏新平;余明桂;;政府干預(yù)、金字塔結(jié)構(gòu)與地方國有上市公司投資[J];管理世界;2008年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉志強;產(chǎn)品市場競爭與投資者法律保護研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 卞玉娟;新制度經(jīng)濟學(xué)理論對我國經(jīng)濟體制改革的啟示[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

2 向正平;我國上市公司控制性股東隧道行為及影響因素研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

3 劉露;新興指標(biāo)在財務(wù)預(yù)警中的應(yīng)用研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

本文編號：1501485