信息化時代我國虛擬社會矛盾治理研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-18 11:09
【摘要】：自1994年中國正式加入互聯(lián)網以來,我國互聯(lián)網絡的運用呈飛速發(fā)展之勢。隨著公眾對互聯(lián)網的運用從最初簡單的信息傳遞逐漸發(fā)展到更加復雜的互動形式,把原本分散的意見訴求通過互聯(lián)網凝聚成了強大的輿論壓力,虛擬社會矛盾順勢而生。我國現階段關于互聯(lián)網空間的相關研究多圍繞于虛擬社會與現實社會二者之間的關系,而對虛擬社會矛盾的研究尚未深入�，F實中不同利益主體間的矛盾通過網絡虛擬社會表達、衍生、變異的情況,就是虛擬社會矛盾。虛擬社會矛盾主要由主體、客體、內容和載體四個要素構成,是現實社會矛盾的一種特殊表現形式,與現實社會矛盾既相互聯(lián)系又相互區(qū)別。虛擬社會矛盾具有主體特殊性、隨機突發(fā)性、交互多維性等特點,可以分為單一型與復合型,爭論型與極化型,局域型與廣泛型等類型。虛擬社會矛盾的生成過程大致分為四個階段:發(fā)生——發(fā)展——高潮——后期�？偟膩碚f,虛擬社會矛盾對人類社會的影響猶如一把“雙刃劍”,既有正面作用,也有負面影響。根據現階段我國虛擬社會矛盾的現狀,可以發(fā)現我國虛擬社會治理還存在著諸多問題,包括政府對虛擬社會矛盾的重要性認識不足,虛擬社會矛盾治理的規(guī)范不完善,虛擬社會矛盾的治理達不到預期效果,虛擬社會與現實社會矛盾治理的整體性思維缺失等。我國虛擬社會矛盾治理不足的主要原因在于現實社會矛盾凸顯對虛擬社會矛盾的頻發(fā)起到決定性作用,虛擬社會矛盾治理的頂層設計滯后以及虛擬社會矛盾的治理能力欠缺。我國虛擬社會矛盾的治理應從多個角度同時展開,橫向上應當堅持虛擬社會矛盾與現實社會矛盾的互動結合;縱向上應當堅持虛擬社會矛盾的防控與應急雙管齊下;同時,還要堅持從道德、法律、運行機制等多個層面對虛擬社會矛盾進行標本兼治,盡快建立健全關于我國虛擬社會矛盾的規(guī)范體系和策略布局。
[Abstract]:Since China joined the Internet in 1994, the use of Internet in China has been developing rapidly. With the public use of the Internet from the initial simple information transmission to a more complex form of interaction, the original scattered opinions through the Internet condensed into a strong pressure of public opinion, virtual social contradictions. At present, the research on Internet space in China is mainly focused on the relationship between virtual society and real society, but the research on the contradiction of virtual society has not been deepened. In reality, the contradictions between different stakeholders are expressed, derived and mutated through the network virtual society, which is the virtual social contradiction. The virtual social contradiction is mainly composed of four elements: subject, object, content and carrier. It is a special manifestation of the social contradiction, and it is not only related to but also different from the real social contradiction. The contradiction of virtual society is characterized by the particularity of the subject, the randomness of the society and the multi-dimensional interaction, which can be divided into single type and compound type, arguing type and polarization type, local type and extensive type, etc. The forming process of virtual social contradiction is divided into four stages: occurrences-development-climax-late stage. In general, the impact of virtual social contradictions on human society is like a "double-edged sword", which has both positive and negative effects. According to the present situation of the virtual social contradiction in our country, we can find that there are still many problems in our country's virtual society governance, including the government's insufficient understanding of the importance of the virtual social contradiction, the imperfect standard of the virtual social contradiction management. The management of virtual social contradictions can not achieve the expected effect, and the holistic thinking of the management of virtual and realistic social contradictions is missing. The main reason for the insufficient governance of the virtual social contradictions in China lies in the fact that the highlight of the real social contradictions plays a decisive role in the frequent occurrence of the virtual social contradictions. The top level design of the virtual social contradictions governance lags behind and the management ability of the virtual social contradictions is lacking. The management of the virtual social contradiction in our country should be carried out simultaneously from many angles. Horizontally, the interactive combination of the virtual social contradiction and the real social contradiction should be adhered to; vertically, the prevention and control of the virtual social contradiction should be combined with the emergency; at the same time, It is also necessary to deal with the contradictions of virtual society from the aspects of morality, law, operation mechanism and so on, so as to establish and perfect the normative system and strategic layout of the contradictions of virtual society in our country as soon as possible.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630
本文編號：2189283
[Abstract]:Since China joined the Internet in 1994, the use of Internet in China has been developing rapidly. With the public use of the Internet from the initial simple information transmission to a more complex form of interaction, the original scattered opinions through the Internet condensed into a strong pressure of public opinion, virtual social contradictions. At present, the research on Internet space in China is mainly focused on the relationship between virtual society and real society, but the research on the contradiction of virtual society has not been deepened. In reality, the contradictions between different stakeholders are expressed, derived and mutated through the network virtual society, which is the virtual social contradiction. The virtual social contradiction is mainly composed of four elements: subject, object, content and carrier. It is a special manifestation of the social contradiction, and it is not only related to but also different from the real social contradiction. The contradiction of virtual society is characterized by the particularity of the subject, the randomness of the society and the multi-dimensional interaction, which can be divided into single type and compound type, arguing type and polarization type, local type and extensive type, etc. The forming process of virtual social contradiction is divided into four stages: occurrences-development-climax-late stage. In general, the impact of virtual social contradictions on human society is like a "double-edged sword", which has both positive and negative effects. According to the present situation of the virtual social contradiction in our country, we can find that there are still many problems in our country's virtual society governance, including the government's insufficient understanding of the importance of the virtual social contradiction, the imperfect standard of the virtual social contradiction management. The management of virtual social contradictions can not achieve the expected effect, and the holistic thinking of the management of virtual and realistic social contradictions is missing. The main reason for the insufficient governance of the virtual social contradictions in China lies in the fact that the highlight of the real social contradictions plays a decisive role in the frequent occurrence of the virtual social contradictions. The top level design of the virtual social contradictions governance lags behind and the management ability of the virtual social contradictions is lacking. The management of the virtual social contradiction in our country should be carried out simultaneously from many angles. Horizontally, the interactive combination of the virtual social contradiction and the real social contradiction should be adhered to; vertically, the prevention and control of the virtual social contradiction should be combined with the emergency; at the same time, It is also necessary to deal with the contradictions of virtual society from the aspects of morality, law, operation mechanism and so on, so as to establish and perfect the normative system and strategic layout of the contradictions of virtual society in our country as soon as possible.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前8條
1 趙暉;虛擬社會與現實社會的關系研究[J];哈爾濱市委黨校學報;2005年05期
2 崇維祥;;虛擬社會是現實社會新的存在形式——以網絡沖突事件為例[J];合肥學院學報(社會科學版);2012年01期
3 何忠國;虛擬與現實的沖突及融合——虛擬世界的本質、特征及其倫理考量[J];河南社會科學;2005年02期
4 鄒衍;走向虛擬社會的反思——關于因特網的矛盾分析[J];理論月刊;2001年08期
5 范國華;賈曉娜;;網絡群體性事件的預警機制[J];人民論壇;2010年32期
6 童大煥;;“遷怒”與網絡暴民及其他[J];中國社會導刊;2006年14期
7 謝俊貴;;網上虛擬社會建設:必要與設想[J];社會科學研究;2010年06期
8 王臣;蘇曉明;;秦火火與立二拆四的網絡江湖[J];中國新聞周刊;2013年32期
，本文編號：2189283
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2189283.html
最近更新
教材專著
