本文選題：行政責(zé)任 + 行政問責(zé)��； 參考：《黑龍江省社會科學(xué)院》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：行政問責(zé)制作為一種加強權(quán)力和制約的現(xiàn)代民主制度,成為中國民主政治發(fā)展和行政管理體制改革的熱點問題。時至今日,我國的行政問責(zé)理論已日臻成熟,行政問責(zé)實踐業(yè)已初見成效。然而,取得成績的同時我們也不能忽略行政問責(zé)體系在我國實際運行中所顯現(xiàn)出的一些問題。我們對行政問責(zé)體系的構(gòu)建進行更深入的研究有助于實現(xiàn)對政府的行政權(quán)力的監(jiān)督與制約,同時對于促進我國的責(zé)任政府建設(shè)、政治文明建設(shè)、豐富權(quán)力監(jiān)督與制約理論都具有十分重要的意義。本文從民主政治條件下的權(quán)力監(jiān)督與制約視角分析我國行政問責(zé)發(fā)展過程中存在的問題及歸因,力求構(gòu)建有效的行政問責(zé)運行體系。分析國內(nèi)外研究的主要成果、觀點、分歧及存在的主要問題�；谖墨I分析的研究方法,梳理并辨析行政問責(zé)相關(guān)的概念及基本理論,為行政問責(zé)體系的構(gòu)建提供理論依據(jù)。對當(dāng)代中國的發(fā)展歷程進行歷史性地考察。從建國初期行政問責(zé)思想的萌芽到十一屆三中全會后的行政問責(zé)初步確立,及至2003年之后行政問責(zé)實踐的全面推行與逐漸完善。對我國當(dāng)代行政問責(zé)體系的發(fā)展進行歷史性地分析,以獲取構(gòu)建我國行政問責(zé)體系的重要啟示。我國行政問責(zé)體系在發(fā)展及構(gòu)建過程中仍存在諸多問題,如問責(zé)主體的缺失致使偏重同體問責(zé)、問責(zé)客體的權(quán)責(zé)與職能過于籠統(tǒng)致使客體責(zé)任不清、問責(zé)范圍不夠廣泛致使問責(zé)內(nèi)容狹窄、問責(zé)程序的設(shè)計不夠健全致使運行不規(guī)范、問責(zé)結(jié)果的處理不透明等等。存在上述問題的主要原因有缺乏問責(zé)意識、政務(wù)公開不透明、問責(zé)制度不完善、問責(zé)機制不健全等。針對我國行政問責(zé)體系存在的問題及原因,提出構(gòu)建并完善我國行政問責(zé)體系的對策。要健全行政問責(zé)主體體系,使各主體間形成問責(zé)合力,規(guī)范行政問責(zé)程序?qū)崿F(xiàn)問責(zé)的制度化和規(guī)范化、完善行政問責(zé)救濟機制保障行政問責(zé)客體的合法權(quán)益,完善官員復(fù)出機制避免人才資源浪費。行政問責(zé)體系的構(gòu)建與有效運行,可以為行政問責(zé)制的發(fā)展給予協(xié)助。
[Abstract]:As a modern democratic system which strengthens the power and restriction, the administrative accountability system has become a hot issue in the development of democratic politics and the reform of administrative management system in China. Today, the theory of administrative accountability in our country has matured, and the practice of administrative accountability has achieved initial results. However, at the same time, we can not ignore some problems in the actual operation of administrative accountability system. A more in-depth study on the construction of administrative accountability system will help us to supervise and restrict the administrative power of the government, and at the same time, to promote the construction of responsible government and political civilization in our country. It is of great significance to enrich the theory of power supervision and restriction. From the perspective of power supervision and restriction under the condition of democratic politics, this paper analyzes the existing problems and attribution in the development of administrative accountability in China, and tries to build an effective system of administrative accountability. Analyze the main research achievements, viewpoints, differences and existing problems at home and abroad. Based on the research methods of literature analysis, this paper combs and discriminates the related concepts and basic theories of administrative accountability, and provides the theoretical basis for the construction of administrative accountability system. To the contemporary China's development course carries on the historical inspection. From the beginning of the founding of the people's Republic of China, the idea of administrative accountability was initially established after the third Plenary session of the Eleventh Central Committee, and the practice of administrative accountability was carried out and gradually perfected after 2003. This paper makes a historical analysis of the development of our country's contemporary administrative accountability system in order to obtain the important enlightenment of constructing our country's administrative accountability system. There are still many problems in the process of development and construction of the administrative accountability system in China, such as the lack of the subject of accountability leads to the emphasis on the accountability of the same body, the responsibility and function of the object of accountability is too general to make the responsibility of the object unclear. The scope of accountability is not wide enough, the content of accountability is narrow, the design of accountability procedure is not perfect and the operation is not standardized, the handling of accountability results is not transparent and so on. The main reasons for these problems are lack of accountability consciousness, opaque government affairs, imperfect accountability system, imperfect accountability mechanism and so on. Aiming at the problems and reasons of administrative accountability system in our country, the countermeasures of constructing and perfecting administrative accountability system in China are put forward. It is necessary to perfect the system of the subject of administrative accountability, to form a joint force of accountability among the subjects, to standardize the procedure of administrative accountability to realize the institutionalization and standardization of accountability, and to perfect the relief mechanism of administrative accountability to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the object of administrative accountability. To improve the mechanism for the return of officials to avoid the waste of human resources. The construction and effective operation of administrative accountability system can assist the development of administrative accountability system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋濤;;行政問責(zé)的范式變化:從傳統(tǒng)到現(xiàn)代[J];東北師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

2 韓志明;;行政責(zé)任:概念、性質(zhì)及其視閾[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年03期

3 司林波;;釋義問責(zé)制[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年01期

4 王一星;;論黨內(nèi)問責(zé)制與行政問責(zé)制的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2010年11期

5 吳傳毅;;行政問責(zé)制的內(nèi)涵及制度完善[J];理論與改革;2010年01期

6 姜曉萍;;行政問責(zé)的體系構(gòu)建與制度保障[J];政治學(xué)研究;2007年03期

7 吳建依;胡謨敦;;關(guān)于行政問責(zé)的理論與實踐探討[J];社會科學(xué)研究;2008年06期

8 張賢明;;當(dāng)代中國問責(zé)制度建設(shè)及實踐的問題與對策[J];政治學(xué)研究;2012年01期

9 伍洪杏;呂錫琛;;行政問責(zé):權(quán)力之善的助推器[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

10 胡春艷;李貴;;西方問責(zé)制研究及其借鑒[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 唐秋玲;我國公務(wù)員行政責(zé)任追究機制探討[D];湘潭大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：2100041