本文選題：遺產(chǎn)旅游地 + 生態(tài)移民　； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著遺產(chǎn)旅游的快速發(fā)展,國(guó)內(nèi)諸多世界遺產(chǎn)地商業(yè)化現(xiàn)象日趨嚴(yán)重,“公地悲劇”現(xiàn)象普遍存在。為最大限度保留世界遺產(chǎn)的原真性,保護(hù)生態(tài)脆弱區(qū)的自然環(huán)境,并幫助當(dāng)?shù)剞r(nóng)民脫貧致富,我國(guó)政府實(shí)施了生態(tài)移民工程這一重要舉措。當(dāng)?shù)鼐用褡鳛樯鷳B(tài)移民工程的主要參與者和生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)的主要提供者,其生計(jì)的可持續(xù)性受到了生態(tài)移民工程的影響。而移民戶搬遷后生計(jì)能力的強(qiáng)弱以及替代生計(jì)方式影響著遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)區(qū)的自然資源利用和生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù),也關(guān)乎生態(tài)移民工程的實(shí)施效果和項(xiàng)目是否具有可持續(xù)性。本研究在可持續(xù)發(fā)展理論、利益補(bǔ)償理論和社區(qū)參與理論等的指導(dǎo)下,以武陵源移民安置區(qū)實(shí)施的生態(tài)移民工程為例,引入國(guó)際先進(jìn)的可持續(xù)生計(jì)框架,結(jié)合遺產(chǎn)地實(shí)際情況,利用參與式觀察法獲取第一手資料,構(gòu)建世界遺產(chǎn)地生態(tài)移民搬遷農(nóng)戶的生計(jì)可持續(xù)指標(biāo)體系,對(duì)武陵源生態(tài)移民戶的生計(jì)資本狀況進(jìn)行了解;并通過移民戶和非移民戶生計(jì)資本、旅游依賴程度的差異對(duì)比,分析生態(tài)移民戶不同旅游依賴程度生計(jì)方式的變遷;最后構(gòu)建logistic模型探討農(nóng)戶生計(jì)資本各因素對(duì)旅游依賴生計(jì)方式的影響。得出如下結(jié)論:(1)武陵源居民的各項(xiàng)生計(jì)資本中,自然資本的存量最多,其次為人力資本,金融資本的存量最低;(2)生態(tài)移民工程實(shí)施后,生態(tài)移民戶的生計(jì)資本存量水平得到提高,移民戶和非移民戶的人力資本均值分別為0.601和0.577;物質(zhì)資本均值分別為0.488和0.442;金融資本均值分別為0.258和0.231;社會(huì)資本均值分別為0.469和0.393;(3)生態(tài)移民戶的家庭收入來源相比移民前變得更加單一,且更傾向于選擇對(duì)旅游依賴程度較低的生計(jì)方式。(4)要讓搬遷出武陵源風(fēng)景區(qū)的生態(tài)移民戶減少對(duì)旅游的依賴,生計(jì)方式得到有效過渡,可以從提高移民戶的受教育水平、改善住房狀況、提高固定資本和信貸水平、發(fā)展其社會(huì)關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)等這些方面著手。研究結(jié)論將有利于解決武陵源移民戶面臨的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境,促進(jìn)旅游項(xiàng)目的順利建設(shè),同時(shí)在實(shí)踐中為解決旅游遺產(chǎn)地失地農(nóng)戶生計(jì)問題提供理論指導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of heritage tourism, the commercialization of many world heritage sites is becoming more and more serious. In order to preserve the original nature of the world heritage, protect the natural environment in the ecologically fragile areas and help the local farmers to get rid of poverty and become rich, the Chinese government has implemented the ecological migration project as an important measure. As the main participants of ecological migration project and the main provider of ecosystem services, the sustainability of local people's livelihood is affected by ecological migration project. The strength of livelihood ability and alternative livelihood mode of migrants after relocation affect the utilization of natural resources and the protection of ecological environment, and also affect the implementation effect of ecological migration project and the sustainability of the project. Under the guidance of sustainable development theory, benefit compensation theory and community participation theory, this study takes the ecological migration project implemented in Wulingyuan resettlement area as an example, introduces the international advanced sustainable livelihood framework, and combines the actual situation of heritage sites. The participatory observation method is used to obtain the first-hand information, to construct the sustainable livelihood index system of the ecological migrants moving farmers in the World Heritage site, and to understand the living capital status of the ecological migrants in Wulingyuan. And by comparing the difference of livelihood capital and tourism dependence degree between migrant and non-immigrant households, this paper analyzes the changes of livelihood mode of ecological immigrant households with different degree of tourism dependence. Finally, logistic model is constructed to explore the impact of various factors of farmers' livelihood capital on tourism dependent livelihood. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) among the livelihood capital of Wulingyuan residents, the natural capital stock is the largest, followed by the human capital, and the financial capital stock is the lowest (2) after the implementation of the ecological migration project, The living capital stock of ecological migrants has been increased. The average values of human capital, physical capital, financial capital and social capital were 0.601 and 0.577, 0.488 and 0.442, 0.258 and 0.231, and 0.469 and 0.393, respectively. More unitary than before emigration, And more inclined to choose a less dependent on tourism livelihood mode. (4) to let the ecological migrants who moved out of Wulingyuan Scenic area to reduce their dependence on tourism, and to get an effective transition of livelihood, we can improve the education level of migrant families. Improve housing, raise the level of fixed capital and credit, the development of social networks and other aspects of these aspects. The conclusion of the study will be helpful to solve the realistic predicament faced by Wulingyuan immigrant families, promote the smooth construction of tourism projects, and provide theoretical guidance for solving the livelihood problems of landless farmers in tourism heritage sites in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D632.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 彭洪俊;;清代云南人口分類中“民”的性質(zhì)及相關(guān)問題考察[J];思想戰(zhàn)線;2013年03期

2 彭俊友;;小山鎮(zhèn)“和弦”曲[J];人民調(diào)解;2006年07期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 汪之力;;圓明園何處去[A];《圓明園》學(xué)刊第六期[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 柏俊林;三千災(zāi)民戶喜遷新居過新年[N];永州日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 管惟三;戰(zhàn)勝村管理“暫住戶”有良方[N];南通日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

3 記者 趙昕源;讓扶貧移民戶搬得出留得住能致富不返遷[N];長(zhǎng)治日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

4 魯慧;“小陣地”服務(wù)“大新村”[N];鄂爾多斯日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

5 本報(bào)記者 白潔 通訊員 高世宗;“無(wú)土移民”：破解了一道增收難題[N];鄂爾多斯日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

6 記者王世剛;扶貧移民搬掉山里農(nóng)民心中一座山[N];撫順日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

7 記者 侯磐石 通訊員 吳建麗;錫市全力推進(jìn)牧民轉(zhuǎn)移工作[N];錫林郭勒日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

8 本報(bào)記者 尚行宇;確保移民戶搬得出穩(wěn)得住富得起[N];貴陽(yáng)日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

9 武俊鵬;扶貧移民計(jì)劃惠及901個(gè)山莊窩鋪[N];山西日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

10 張玉峰 高志彥;岢嵐農(nóng)民靠扶貧移民脫貧致富[N];忻州日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 曾輝;元代民戶賦役制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

2 王政;唐代官僚政治與唐前期民戶流亡關(guān)系研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

3 易靜;世界遺產(chǎn)地生態(tài)移民戶生計(jì)方式變遷研究：武陵源案例[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1894695