本文選題：利益動(dòng)機(jī)　切入點(diǎn)：農(nóng)業(yè)稅時(shí)代　出處：《農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)》2016年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程中的經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)、政治、文化等狀況決定了國(guó)家、基層政府推行村民自治的利益動(dòng)機(jī),并因此影響著村民自治的實(shí)際績(jī)效。在整個(gè)20世紀(jì)國(guó)家內(nèi)向式積累的宏觀歷史背景下,基層政府對(duì)村民自治的"逆民主"踐行,一方面基本保證了國(guó)家低成本地汲取鄉(xiāng)村資源、維持鄉(xiāng)村秩序的利益動(dòng)機(jī)的實(shí)現(xiàn),另一方面違背了國(guó)家在農(nóng)村實(shí)現(xiàn)"民主"現(xiàn)代化的動(dòng)機(jī),致使村民自治制度設(shè)計(jì)追求的"民主政治"效果并不明顯。農(nóng)業(yè)稅時(shí)代的村民自治,是基層政府以"逆民主"的方式代表國(guó)家低成本地汲取鄉(xiāng)村資源、維持鄉(xiāng)村秩序的制度和組織載體。
[Abstract]:The economic, social, political and cultural conditions in the process of China's modernization have determined the interest motive of the state and grass-roots governments in promoting villagers' autonomy. In the macro historical background of the national introverted accumulation in 20th century, the practice of "anti-democracy" of grass-roots government to villager autonomy, on the one hand, basically guaranteed the country to absorb rural resources at low cost. The realization of interest motive to maintain rural order, on the other hand, violates the motive of the country to realize "democracy" modernization in rural areas, which makes the effect of "democratic politics" pursued by the design of villager autonomy system not obvious. It is the system and organization carrier for the grass-roots government to absorb rural resources and maintain rural order on behalf of the country in the way of "anti-democracy".
【作者單位】： 內(nèi)江師范學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D638;F812.42

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 云帆;人大代表中的政府官員不宜過多[N];學(xué)習(xí)時(shí)報(bào);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1624529