本文關(guān)鍵詞：行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟銜接機(jī)制探討，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟銜接機(jī)制探討

行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟銜接機(jī)制探討

行政復(fù)議、行政訴訟在化解行政爭(zhēng)議,推動(dòng)社會(huì)和諧中發(fā)揮著重要作用。在傳統(tǒng)上,一般認(rèn)為我國(guó)的行政復(fù)議制度是一種行政的內(nèi)部糾錯(cuò)機(jī)制,據(jù)此建立了書(shū)面審理、一次復(fù)議、不停止執(zhí)行等一系列行政性的爭(zhēng)議解決機(jī)制�！缎姓䦶�(fù)議法》頒布10多年來(lái),行政復(fù)議制度顯示了5大弊端,限制了這一制度功能的發(fā)揮。關(guān)于行政復(fù)議究竟該定位于監(jiān)督還是救濟(jì),學(xué)界看法不一。本文認(rèn)為我國(guó)的行政復(fù)議應(yīng)從行政機(jī)關(guān)的內(nèi)部糾錯(cuò)機(jī)制的定位轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)樾姓?zhēng)議的救濟(jì)機(jī)制,明確行政復(fù)議的救濟(jì)功能,應(yīng)建立相對(duì)獨(dú)立、中立的行政復(fù)議機(jī)關(guān),引進(jìn)司法化的處理爭(zhēng)議模式,同時(shí)保證行政復(fù)議的公正和效率。本文從英國(guó)、美國(guó)、法國(guó)、韓國(guó)四國(guó)的行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟關(guān)系淺析淺析入手,結(jié)合行政權(quán)與司法權(quán)的關(guān)系淺析淺析,探索我國(guó)應(yīng)該建立的銜接模式。在目前行政爭(zhēng)議多發(fā)的情況下,如何做好行政復(fù)議和行政訴訟這兩種救濟(jì)方式的銜接,處理好行政爭(zhēng)議行政解決與司法解決的關(guān)系,共同保護(hù)公民的合法權(quán)益是法學(xué)理論研究和制度設(shè)計(jì)的重要課題。本文從理論和實(shí)踐上淺析淺析二者的性質(zhì)和關(guān)系,淺析淺析二者的銜接模式,并對(duì)現(xiàn)在正在各地試點(diǎn)的行政復(fù)議委員會(huì)模式提出質(zhì)疑。本文認(rèn)為應(yīng)針對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)情,對(duì)現(xiàn)行的行政復(fù)議制度進(jìn)行改造,建立我國(guó)相對(duì)中立的行政復(fù)議制度,讓的行政爭(zhēng)議通過(guò)行政復(fù)議途徑得到化解,讓這一制度成為化解行政爭(zhēng)議的主渠道。同時(shí)確立司法終局裁決制度,讓行政爭(zhēng)議能夠接受司法的終局審查,克服單純行政解決方式可能帶來(lái)的“官官相互”的弊端,避開(kāi)行政爭(zhēng)議解決的“體制內(nèi)循環(huán)”,保障行政爭(zhēng)議的最終司法處理。應(yīng)當(dāng)做好行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟技術(shù)層面的銜接,比如行政復(fù)議和行政訴訟的提起時(shí)間的銜接,受案范圍的銜接、行政復(fù)議結(jié)果的效力不足等。通過(guò)一系列制度的設(shè)置,建立我國(guó)的行政爭(zhēng)議解決模式,讓行政爭(zhēng)議能夠按照正常的鏈條得到解決,避開(kāi)因?yàn)樾姓?zhēng)議引發(fā)社會(huì)動(dòng)蕩。

【Abstract】 Administrative reconsideration, administrative litigation in resolving administrative disputes and promote social harmony plays an important role. Traditionally, the general view that the administrative review of an administrative system is an internal error correction mechanism whereby the establishment of a written hearing, a review, do not stop the implementation of a series of administrative dispute resolution mechanism. "Administrative Reconsideration Law" promulgated 10 years, the administrative review system shows the 5 major drawbacks limit the functionality of the system to play. What about the administrative review with the Authority or the positioning of relief, academics are divided. This paper argues that the administrative reconsideration of the executive from the positioning of the internal error correction mechanisms into relief the administrative dispute mechanism, a clear function of the administrative review of relief, should establish independent, neutral agency administrative review, the introduction of judicial disputes of the treatment model while ensuring fairness and efficiency of the administrative review.This article from the UK, U.S., France, South Korea four countries between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation analysis, combining the executive power and judicial power relationship analysis, to explore the convergence of pattern should be established. Multiple administrative dispute in the present case, how to do administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation convergence of these two remedies, handle the administration to resolve administrative disputes and judicial settlement of the relations, and jointly protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and the legal theory of system design an important issue. In this paper, both theory and practice of the nature and relations of both the convergence model, and the pilot is now all over the Administrative Review Committee to be questioned.This paper argues that China’s national conditions should be targeted on the current administrative review system reform, the establishment of the relative neutrality of the administrative review system, while establishing the final award of the administrative judge of judicial system, so that more channels of administrative disputes be resolved through administrative review, Let this system has become the main channel to resolve administrative disputes.At the same time a final decision to establish justice system so that the administrative dispute to accept the final judicial review of administrative solutions to overcome the pure potential "between government officials," the defects, to avoid the administrative dispute resolution "system within the cycle," the ultimate protection of administrative disputes judicial treatment. Shall do the administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, the interface between the technical level, such as administrative reconsideration and administrative proceedings instituted time convergence, case range of convergence, the validity of the results of administrative review problems. Through a series of system settings, the establishment of China’s administrative dispute resolution model, so that the administrative dispute can be resolved in accordance with the normal chain, avoid the administrative dispute lead to social unrest.

【關(guān)鍵詞】 行政爭(zhēng)議； 行政復(fù)議； 行政訴訟； 制度銜接；
【Key words】 administrative disputes； administrative reconsideration； administrative litigation； reconsideration litigation； convergence of systems；

更多論文推薦: 各專(zhuān)業(yè)論文 海量論文下載

上一篇文章： 保安服務(wù)行業(yè)管理法治化探討

下一篇文章： 金陵女子大學(xué)和北京女子高等師范學(xué)校比較探討

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟銜接機(jī)制探討，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

，

本文編號(hào)：119112