本文關(guān)鍵詞：中美農(nóng)業(yè)智庫行為比較研究　出處：《情報雜志》2016年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 智庫 農(nóng)業(yè)智庫 智庫行為 中國 美國

【摘要】：[目的/意義]中外智庫比較研究是智庫研究中的一個重要方面,不同社會文化背景、管理體制和運行機制下智庫行為的比較,對中國智庫未來發(fā)展借鑒國際經(jīng)驗具有重要意義。[方法/過程]選擇中美兩國不同類型的農(nóng)業(yè)類智庫作為典型案例,從科研學(xué)術(shù)、政策咨詢、社會輿論、合作交流四個方面,對比分析中美智庫的行為,由此透視中美智庫發(fā)展的差異性和規(guī)律特征。[結(jié)果/結(jié)論]發(fā)現(xiàn)中美兩國科研院所類智庫的學(xué)術(shù)行為都比大學(xué)附屬型智庫活躍;布魯金斯學(xué)會的科研學(xué)術(shù)行為和政策咨詢行為最為活躍;與美國相比,中國智庫的政策咨詢行為的影響力存在較大差距;美國民間智庫更加注重與媒體的溝通和聯(lián)系,通過各種途徑來擴展自身的合作交流網(wǎng)絡(luò)。最后討論了美國經(jīng)驗對中國智庫建設(shè)的建議,以及中美智庫行為比較研究的未來。
[Abstract]:[Purpose / significance] the comparative study of Chinese and foreign think tanks is an important aspect in the research of think tanks. The comparison of think tanks behavior under different social culture background, management system and operation mechanism is of great significance for the future development of Chinese think tanks and learning from international experience. [method / process] select the different types of agricultural think tanks in China and the US as a typical case, and compare the behavior of Chinese and American think tanks from four aspects of academic research, policy consultation, public opinion and cooperation and exchange, so as to see the differences and characteristics of the development of Sino US think tanks. [Conclusion] the results / academic behavior of Sino US research institutes think-tank than university affiliated think-tank active; academic behavior at the Brookings Institution and policy advisory behavior is the most active; compared with the United States, there is a big gap between the policy consulting think tank influence behavior Chinese; communication and contact us to pay more attention to the media and think tanks, to expand their cooperation network through various channels. Finally, it discusses the suggestions of American experience on the construction of Chinese think tanks, and the future of the comparative study of the behavior of the Chinese and American think tanks.
【作者單位】： 沈陽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟管理學(xué)院;中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院農(nóng)業(yè)信息研究所;
【基金】：中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院科技創(chuàng)新工程項目“農(nóng)業(yè)知識組織與知識挖掘團隊” 遼寧省社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃基金項目“遼寧省農(nóng)業(yè)智庫及其合作交流網(wǎng)絡(luò)研究”(編號:L15CTQ003) 遼寧省教育科研管理智庫項目“遼寧省高�？蒲袡C構(gòu)合作交流網(wǎng)絡(luò)研究”(編號:ZK2015093)
【分類號】：C932
【正文快照】： Liang Li1,2Zhang Xuefu2(1.The College of Economics and Management,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866;2.Institute of Agricultural Information,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081)0引言隨著經(jīng)濟和技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展進步,中國政府，

本文編號：1340001