本文選題：新企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則 + 截面操控性應(yīng)計(jì)利潤(rùn)��； 參考：《暨南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：自2007年1月1日起,我國(guó)上市公司全面執(zhí)行與高質(zhì)量的國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則趨同的新企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則。本文正是基于這一制度變遷,以2004-2009年我國(guó)滬深兩市A股上市公司為研究樣本,對(duì)新企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則是否提高了我國(guó)上市公司會(huì)計(jì)信息的核心部分——盈余信息的質(zhì)量進(jìn)行了研究,我們是以截面操控性應(yīng)計(jì)利潤(rùn)絕對(duì)值作為盈余質(zhì)量的替代變量的。然而,截面操控性應(yīng)計(jì)利潤(rùn)絕對(duì)值也常常用作對(duì)盈余管理進(jìn)行度量,在檢驗(yàn)了以截面操控性應(yīng)計(jì)利潤(rùn)絕對(duì)值為替代變量的盈余管理是否與審計(jì)師變更顯著相關(guān)后,對(duì)盈余質(zhì)量改善與否給審計(jì)師變更帶來的影響做一個(gè)總結(jié)。 具體來說,本文的研究思路為：首先,根據(jù)修正Jones模型分行業(yè)分年度進(jìn)行回歸得出各樣本公司的截面操控性應(yīng)計(jì)利潤(rùn),以截面操控性應(yīng)計(jì)利潤(rùn)絕對(duì)值作為盈余質(zhì)量的考察指標(biāo)；其次,在控制非準(zhǔn)則因素的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)衡量盈余質(zhì)量的模型進(jìn)行回歸,以此考察新企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則實(shí)施后,我國(guó)上市公司盈余質(zhì)量是否確實(shí)得到提高；再次,考察用相同指標(biāo)衡量的盈余管理與審計(jì)師變更是否顯著相關(guān)。有學(xué)者研究發(fā)現(xiàn)上市公司的性質(zhì)與其盈余質(zhì)量相關(guān),為深入研究更富彈性的新企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則對(duì)不同性質(zhì)上市公司的影響,我們以實(shí)際控制人屬性為區(qū)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)將樣本分為國(guó)有企業(yè)組和民營(yíng)企業(yè)組進(jìn)行考察。與之對(duì)應(yīng),在研究盈余管理與審計(jì)師變更之間的關(guān)系時(shí)也對(duì)樣本作出了同樣的分組。 我們的研究結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),新企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則實(shí)施后,我國(guó)上市公司盈余質(zhì)量整體有所上升,進(jìn)行了更少的盈余管理,盈余管理顯著地影響著審計(jì)師變更,最終導(dǎo)致了審計(jì)師變更行為的減少。在對(duì)樣本進(jìn)行分組研究后,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)國(guó)有上市公司組的檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果基本與全樣本一致,但是在民營(yíng)企業(yè)組我們并沒有找到有力證據(jù)支持相關(guān)假設(shè)。
[Abstract]:Since January 1, 2007, China's listed companies have fully implemented the new accounting standards for enterprises that converge with high quality international accounting standards. Based on this institutional change, this paper studies whether the new accounting standards have improved the quality of earnings information, which is the core part of accounting information of listed companies in China, taking the A-share listed companies of Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2004 to 2009 as the research samples. We take the absolute value of accrual profit as the substitute variable of earnings quality. However, the absolute value of cross-section accrual profit is also often measured by earnings management. After testing whether earnings management with cross-section control accrual profit absolute value as a substitute variable is significantly related to auditor change, Summarize the effect of earnings quality improvement on auditor change. Specifically, the research ideas of this paper are as follows: firstly, according to the modified Jones model, the cross-section operating accrual profit of each sample company is obtained by industry regression, and the absolute value of cross-section control accrual profit is taken as the inspection index of earnings quality; Secondly, on the basis of controlling non-standard factors, the model of measuring earnings quality is regressed to investigate whether the earnings quality of listed companies in China has really been improved after the implementation of the new accounting standards. To investigate whether earnings management measured by the same indicators is significantly related to auditor change. Some scholars have found that the nature of listed companies is related to their earnings quality. The sample is divided into state-owned enterprise group and private enterprise group. In contrast, the relationship between earnings management and auditor change is also divided into the same group. Our research results show that after the implementation of the new accounting standards for enterprises, the earnings quality of listed companies in China has increased as a whole, and less earnings management has been carried out, and earnings management has significantly affected the change of auditors. Finally, it leads to the reduction of auditor's change behavior. After grouping the samples, we find that the test results of the state-owned listed companies are basically consistent with the full sample, but in the private enterprise group, we do not find strong evidence to support the relevant assumptions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：F233;F239.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李維安,王新漢,王威;盈余管理與審計(jì)意見關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究——基于非經(jīng)營(yíng)性收益的分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2004年11期

2 王軍威;我國(guó)上市公司變更會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所現(xiàn)象透視[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2003年08期

3 何紅渠,張志紅;有關(guān)審計(jì)意見識(shí)別盈余管理能力的研究——來自滬市制造業(yè)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2003年06期

4 鄧小洋,章瑩瑩;會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所變更、盈余管理與審計(jì)質(zhì)量[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2005年03期

5 劉偉;劉星;;審計(jì)師變更與盈余管理關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究──來自中國(guó)A股市場(chǎng)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2006年01期

6 程書強(qiáng);;機(jī)構(gòu)投資者持股與上市公司會(huì)計(jì)盈余信息關(guān)系實(shí)證研究[J];管理世界;2006年09期

7 王俊秋;張奇峰;;終極控制權(quán)、現(xiàn)金流量權(quán)與盈余信息含量——來自家族上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2007年12期

8 陳小悅,肖星,過曉艷;配股權(quán)與上市公司利潤(rùn)操縱[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2000年01期

9 楊德明;林斌;辛清泉;;盈利質(zhì)量、投資者非理性行為與盈余慣性[J];金融研究;2007年02期

10 李增泉;實(shí)證分析:審計(jì)意見的信息含量[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;1999年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1949434