石油行業(yè)行政壟斷的現(xiàn)實危害研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-20 12:27
【摘要】：石油產(chǎn)業(yè)屬于國民經(jīng)濟中的基礎(chǔ)性產(chǎn)業(yè),對一國社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展起著強大的支撐、帶動和輻射作用。從1949年新中國成立初步建立我國石油工業(yè)體系到現(xiàn)在,我國石油產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)歷了從無到有、從小到大的歷史蛻變。特別是1998年以來,政府在石油行業(yè)實施了一系列改革與改組,收獲了不少的成效。然而,石油行業(yè)長期存在的效率低下問題和壟斷經(jīng)營格局始終未變,市場作為資源配置的主體地位仍未建立,市場在資源配置上的基礎(chǔ)性作用遠未得到充分發(fā)揮,石油行業(yè)中的問題依舊重重。 長期以來,基于石油產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)模經(jīng)濟效應(yīng)的考慮,學者多認為石油行業(yè)屬于自然壟斷行業(yè)。但是在我國,石油行業(yè)一直處于政府的嚴格管控之下,是由政府一手塑造發(fā)展起來的。政府在石油行業(yè)頒布實施的諸多妨礙、限制市場競爭的法律法規(guī)構(gòu)成了有利于形成壟斷的制度,加之政府在石油行業(yè)自上而下開展的一系列重組與改革,從而促成了如今石油行業(yè)三分天下的寡頭壟斷格局,因此,石油行業(yè)的壟斷帶有濃郁的行政壟斷色彩。 目前,有關(guān)石油行業(yè)行政壟斷問題的研究并不多見并且存在較大的分歧,本文運用文獻研究法和比較研究法,對石油行業(yè)行政壟斷的現(xiàn)實危害進行了具體分析。文章第一章主要介紹了研究背景及意義,第二章對國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀進行了梳理,第三章分析了石油行業(yè)的市場結(jié)構(gòu),結(jié)合石油行業(yè)的歷史沿革及壟斷格局的形成過程,證明石油行業(yè)的寡頭壟斷實質(zhì)上屬于行政壟斷,第四章著重分析石油行業(yè)行政壟斷導致的現(xiàn)實危害,證明在行政壟斷之下,石油行業(yè)的市場競爭受到了不當限制與排斥,壟斷石油集團的特權(quán)不斷膨脹,行政力量代替市場配置資源,導致市場被扭曲,石油行業(yè)行政壟斷造成了諸多的危害,例如：壟斷石油集團經(jīng)營績效低下,缺乏國際競爭力；民營石油企業(yè)舉步維艱,大批倒閉；石油行業(yè)整體效率低下；油價居高不下,漲多跌少,油荒持續(xù)存在；壟斷石油集團高利潤、高收入、高福利,行業(yè)收入差距增大；行政壟斷破壞社會公正等等�；趯ι鲜鑫：Φ恼J識,第五章提出從區(qū)分壟斷性業(yè)務(wù)與競爭性業(yè)務(wù)、引入競爭機制、提高政府機構(gòu)規(guī)制效率等方面嘗試破除行政壟斷。
[Abstract]:The petroleum industry is a basic industry in the national economy, which plays a strong supporting role in the development of a country's social economy. From the founding of New China in 1949 to the establishment of China's petroleum industry system, China's petroleum industry has undergone a historical transformation from scratch to existence and from small to large. Especially since 1998, the government has implemented a series of reforms and reshuffles in the petroleum industry, with many achievements. However, the long-standing problems of low efficiency and monopoly in the petroleum industry have not changed, the market as the main body of resource allocation has not been established, and the fundamental role of the market in the allocation of resources has not been fully brought into play. Problems remain in the oil industry. For a long time, considering the scale economy effect of petroleum industry, many scholars think that petroleum industry belongs to natural monopoly industry. But in our country, the petroleum industry has been under the strict control of the government, which has been shaped and developed by the government. Many laws and regulations that hinder the government's promulgation and implementation of the petroleum industry and limit market competition constitute a system conducive to the formation of a monopoly, coupled with a series of restructuring and reforms carried out by the government in the oil industry from top to bottom. Therefore, the monopoly of petroleum industry has strong administrative monopoly color. At present, the research on the administrative monopoly of petroleum industry is rare and there are great differences. This paper makes a concrete analysis of the actual harm of the administrative monopoly of petroleum industry by using the method of literature research and comparative study. The first chapter mainly introduces the research background and significance, the second chapter combs the domestic and foreign research status, the third chapter analyzes the market structure of the petroleum industry, combined with the history of the oil industry and the formation process of the monopoly pattern. It is proved that the oligopoly in the petroleum industry belongs to the administrative monopoly in essence. The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of the actual harm caused by the administrative monopoly in the petroleum industry, and proves that under the administrative monopoly, the market competition in the petroleum industry has been improperly restricted and excluded. The monopoly oil group's privilege expands unceasingly, the administrative power replaces the market allocation resources, causes the market to be distorted, the petroleum profession administrative monopoly has caused many harm, for example: the monopoly petroleum group management performance is low, lacks the international competitive power; Private oil enterprises are struggling and closing down in large numbers; the overall efficiency of the oil industry is low; the oil price is high, rising and falling little, the oil shortage is persistent; the monopoly oil group has high profit, high income, high welfare, and the income gap of the industry is increasing; Administrative monopoly undermines social justice and so on. Based on the understanding of the above harm, the fifth chapter proposes to try to break down the administrative monopoly from distinguishing monopoly business from competitive business, introducing competition mechanism, improving the efficiency of government regulation and so on.
【學位授予單位】：西南交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F426.22
本文編號：2412039
[Abstract]:The petroleum industry is a basic industry in the national economy, which plays a strong supporting role in the development of a country's social economy. From the founding of New China in 1949 to the establishment of China's petroleum industry system, China's petroleum industry has undergone a historical transformation from scratch to existence and from small to large. Especially since 1998, the government has implemented a series of reforms and reshuffles in the petroleum industry, with many achievements. However, the long-standing problems of low efficiency and monopoly in the petroleum industry have not changed, the market as the main body of resource allocation has not been established, and the fundamental role of the market in the allocation of resources has not been fully brought into play. Problems remain in the oil industry. For a long time, considering the scale economy effect of petroleum industry, many scholars think that petroleum industry belongs to natural monopoly industry. But in our country, the petroleum industry has been under the strict control of the government, which has been shaped and developed by the government. Many laws and regulations that hinder the government's promulgation and implementation of the petroleum industry and limit market competition constitute a system conducive to the formation of a monopoly, coupled with a series of restructuring and reforms carried out by the government in the oil industry from top to bottom. Therefore, the monopoly of petroleum industry has strong administrative monopoly color. At present, the research on the administrative monopoly of petroleum industry is rare and there are great differences. This paper makes a concrete analysis of the actual harm of the administrative monopoly of petroleum industry by using the method of literature research and comparative study. The first chapter mainly introduces the research background and significance, the second chapter combs the domestic and foreign research status, the third chapter analyzes the market structure of the petroleum industry, combined with the history of the oil industry and the formation process of the monopoly pattern. It is proved that the oligopoly in the petroleum industry belongs to the administrative monopoly in essence. The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of the actual harm caused by the administrative monopoly in the petroleum industry, and proves that under the administrative monopoly, the market competition in the petroleum industry has been improperly restricted and excluded. The monopoly oil group's privilege expands unceasingly, the administrative power replaces the market allocation resources, causes the market to be distorted, the petroleum profession administrative monopoly has caused many harm, for example: the monopoly petroleum group management performance is low, lacks the international competitive power; Private oil enterprises are struggling and closing down in large numbers; the overall efficiency of the oil industry is low; the oil price is high, rising and falling little, the oil shortage is persistent; the monopoly oil group has high profit, high income, high welfare, and the income gap of the industry is increasing; Administrative monopoly undermines social justice and so on. Based on the understanding of the above harm, the fifth chapter proposes to try to break down the administrative monopoly from distinguishing monopoly business from competitive business, introducing competition mechanism, improving the efficiency of government regulation and so on.
【學位授予單位】：西南交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F426.22
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 劉海霞;;不能將生態(tài)文明等同于后工業(yè)文明——兼與王孔雀教授商榷[J];生態(tài)經(jīng)濟;2011年02期
2 胡亞明 ,季文斌;人防工程 火患成因及防治對策初探[J];上海消防;1994年02期
3 姚慧娥,王剛;論產(chǎn)品的過度包裝及法律對策[J];環(huán)境保護;2005年04期
4 張輝,馬東升;環(huán)境地球化學、環(huán)境化學、環(huán)境生物無機化學的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別[J];環(huán)境化學;2000年02期
5 于光遠;加強災害科學研究 促進減災實踐發(fā)展──為《災害大百科》所作的序[J];災害學;1997年02期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前6條
1 王曉華;計算詐騙數(shù)額要不要減去犯罪成本[N];北方法制報;2005年
2 魏民巖;引導青少年正確使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)[N];人民日報;2004年
3 鄧洪濤 林焱炎;計算詐騙數(shù)額要不要減去犯罪成本[N];檢察日報;2004年
4 新疆庫車縣公安局局長 李雷;忠實履行人民警察職責，為西部大開發(fā)做出新貢獻[N];中國鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)報;2004年
5 劉志中;變廢為寶應(yīng)有時[N];中華建筑報;2004年
6 賴凌 余敏 特約記者 曾友輝;戰(zhàn)友，請文明上網(wǎng)[N];戰(zhàn)士報;2004年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條
1 唐東博;石油行業(yè)行政壟斷的現(xiàn)實危害研究[D];西南交通大學;2013年
2 歐陽艷飛;刑訊逼供犯罪的危害、成因及防治對策[D];湘潭大學;2006年
3 周曉英;論中亞“三股勢力”對中國西部新疆安全的影響[D];新疆大學;2004年
，本文編號：2412039
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/shengchanguanlilunwen/2412039.html
最近更新
教材專著
