本文選題：建筑企業(yè)集團(tuán) + 區(qū)域公司�。� 參考：《南京工業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,隨著全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的不斷深入,建筑企業(yè)規(guī)模的不斷擴(kuò)大,建筑企業(yè)集團(tuán)已經(jīng)成為公司形態(tài)發(fā)展的主流形式。然而,隨著企業(yè)集團(tuán)規(guī)模以及多元化程度的不斷提高,也隨之帶來一系列的問題,例如管理鏈條過長(zhǎng)、信息傳遞緩慢甚至失真、資源分散,進(jìn)而衍生出同質(zhì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)等問題。所以,縮短管理鏈條,使組織結(jié)構(gòu)扁平化,讓更熟悉本地市場(chǎng)的區(qū)域公司自主決策就成為了企業(yè)集團(tuán)管理的一個(gè)較好的選擇。但是,面對(duì)建筑集團(tuán)公司組織的日趨龐大,總公司如何才能實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)下屬區(qū)域公司的有效控制就成為了集團(tuán)公司在經(jīng)營(yíng)管理中亟待解決的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題。對(duì)區(qū)域公司經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效進(jìn)行有效評(píng)價(jià)不僅是建筑企業(yè)集團(tuán)管控的核心部分,而且通過對(duì)區(qū)域公司績(jī)效的評(píng)價(jià)能夠獲得大量的對(duì)集團(tuán)管控有利的信息,以便進(jìn)一步提高企業(yè)集團(tuán)整體的管控能力,對(duì)建筑企業(yè)集團(tuán)的經(jīng)營(yíng)管理具有一定的指導(dǎo)意義。 本文在對(duì)建筑企業(yè)集團(tuán)的理論和建筑企業(yè)集團(tuán)管控理論進(jìn)行梳理和總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)建筑企業(yè)集團(tuán)的特征和類型,以及建筑企業(yè)集團(tuán)管控的類型、特征和目標(biāo)分別進(jìn)行了闡述,并從系統(tǒng)分析的視角對(duì)建筑企業(yè)管控系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行了框架分析。在此基礎(chǔ)上,重點(diǎn)介紹了區(qū)域公司績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)與建筑企業(yè)集團(tuán)管控的關(guān)系,以及集團(tuán)公司績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的關(guān)鍵控制點(diǎn)和協(xié)同點(diǎn)。然后,在對(duì)建筑企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建原則和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行明確的前提下,從盈利能力、管理水平、人力資源和技術(shù)能力四個(gè)方面構(gòu)建了區(qū)域公司績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。對(duì)區(qū)域公司績(jī)效的評(píng)價(jià)引入了數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析方法,從決策單元、生產(chǎn)可能集、規(guī)模收益、技術(shù)有效四個(gè)方面詳細(xì)介紹了DEA模型,并著重介紹了DEA的兩個(gè)基本模型CCR和BCC模型。在此基礎(chǔ)上為了克服DEA模型在指標(biāo)權(quán)重選取上的主觀隨意性和盲目性,引入了熵值法—這一客觀、科學(xué)的指標(biāo)賦權(quán)方法,構(gòu)建了績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的熵值法—-DEA混合模型,并進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析,驗(yàn)證了模型的實(shí)用性和有效性。最后總結(jié)了本文的主要結(jié)論和研究成果,以及有待進(jìn)一步解決的問題和不足。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the deepening of global economic integration and the expansion of the scale of construction enterprises, construction enterprise groups have become the mainstream form of corporate development. However, with the continuous improvement of enterprise group size and diversification degree, it also brings a series of problems, such as too long management chain, slow or even distorted information transmission, scattered resources, and then give rise to homogeneous competition and so on. Therefore, shortening the management chain, flattening the organizational structure and making regional companies more familiar with the local market have become a better choice for enterprise group management. However, in the face of the increasingly large organization of the construction group company, how the head office can realize the effective control of the subordinate regional company has become a practical problem to be solved urgently in the operation and management of the group company. The effective evaluation of the performance of regional companies is not only the core part of the management and control of construction enterprise groups, but also can obtain a large amount of information beneficial to the management and control of regional companies through the evaluation of the performance of regional companies. In order to further improve the overall management and control ability of enterprise groups, it has certain guiding significance to the management and management of construction enterprise groups. On the basis of combing and summarizing the theory of construction enterprise group and management theory of building enterprise group, this paper expounds the characteristics and types of construction enterprise group, as well as the types, characteristics and objectives of construction enterprise group control. And from the point of view of system analysis, the framework of management and control system of construction enterprises is analyzed. On this basis, the relationship between performance evaluation of regional companies and management of construction enterprise groups, as well as the key control points and collaborative points of performance evaluation of regional companies are introduced. Then, on the premise of establishing the principle and standard of construction enterprise performance evaluation index system, this paper constructs the regional company performance evaluation index system from four aspects: profitability, management level, human resources and technical ability. This paper introduces the method of data envelopment analysis to the performance evaluation of regional companies, and introduces the DEA model in detail from four aspects: decision making unit, possible set of production, profit of scale and technical efficiency. Two basic models of DEA, CCR and BCC, are emphatically introduced. On this basis, in order to overcome the subjective randomness and blindness in the index weight selection of DEA model, this paper introduces the entropy method, which is an objective and scientific index weighting method, and constructs a hybrid model of entropy value method for performance evaluation. An empirical analysis is carried out to verify the practicability and validity of the model. Finally, this paper summarizes the main conclusions and research results, as well as further problems and shortcomings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F426.92

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張先治;論內(nèi)部管理控制系統(tǒng)十要素[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2005年23期

2 陳尉;;國(guó)有企業(yè)集團(tuán)公司管控模式選擇[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)財(cái)會(huì);2008年11期

3 朱國(guó)榮;張亞賢;王文章;;基于利益相關(guān)者理論的建筑企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)[J];財(cái)政監(jiān)督;2012年14期

4 彭琳;;基于利益相關(guān)者的企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)設(shè)計(jì)[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2012年05期

5 葛晨,徐金發(fā);母子公司的管理與控制模式——北大方正集團(tuán)、中國(guó)華誠(chéng)集團(tuán)等管理與控制模式案例評(píng)析[J];管理世界;1999年06期

6 王化成,劉俊勇;企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)模式研究——兼論中國(guó)企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)模式選擇[J];管理世界;2004年04期

7 王欽,張?jiān)品?大型企業(yè)集團(tuán)管控模式比較與總部權(quán)力配置[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年03期

8 劉虹;;增強(qiáng)集團(tuán)管控力[J];上海國(guó)資;2007年04期

9 孟執(zhí)芳;陳志軍;;母子公司管理控制相關(guān)概念辨析[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2007年04期

10 李明智;關(guān)于企業(yè)綜合評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的探討[J];黑龍江財(cái)會(huì);2002年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 付春滿;企業(yè)集團(tuán)管理控制系統(tǒng)研究[D];天津大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1794122