本文選題：人力資源 + 資源錯(cuò)配��； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文在Brandt,Tombe and Zhu(2013)的理論框架的基礎(chǔ)上,將生產(chǎn)函數(shù)形式擴(kuò)展為包含低技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力和高技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力的柯布-道格拉斯生產(chǎn)函數(shù),測(cè)算了中國(guó)1993-2012年國(guó)有單位和非國(guó)有單位之間的資源錯(cuò)配程度和各省之間的資源錯(cuò)配程度及其變化路徑,并分析了導(dǎo)致人力資源錯(cuò)配的具體原因及其應(yīng)對(duì)策略。實(shí)證發(fā)現(xiàn),2000年以后中國(guó)的資源錯(cuò)配程度總體上不斷下降,尤其是2000-2007年資源錯(cuò)配程度下降較快,資源配置效率明顯提高,這是由國(guó)有單位和非國(guó)有單位之間資本配置效率的提高所主導(dǎo)。1997-2003年各省之間資源錯(cuò)配程度有所上升,2004年以后略有下降,這主要體現(xiàn)為低技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力和高技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力在各省之間配置效率的變化。資本和低技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力錯(cuò)配程度較高,高技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力錯(cuò)配程度較低。各省之間資本錯(cuò)配對(duì)資本總錯(cuò)配的貢獻(xiàn)程度越來越大。低技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力的錯(cuò)配總體上體現(xiàn)為低技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力在各省之間的錯(cuò)配。2001年以后高技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力的錯(cuò)配總體上體現(xiàn)為高技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力在各省之間的錯(cuò)配。1996-2004年高技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力在國(guó)有單位和非國(guó)有單位之間的配置效率大幅提高,2005年以后配置效率沒有明顯變化。1996-2001年高技術(shù)勞動(dòng)力在各省之間的配置效率略有下降,但是2002年以后配置效率逐漸提高。國(guó)企改革、對(duì)外開放是人力資源在國(guó)有單位和非國(guó)有單位之間配置效率提高的主要原因。追求區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)總量平衡的政策、市場(chǎng)分割和戶籍制度是導(dǎo)致中國(guó)人力資源在地區(qū)之間配置效率惡化的主要原因。為提高人力資源的配置效率,應(yīng)該逐步消除由行政壟斷導(dǎo)致的進(jìn)入壁壘,通過市場(chǎng)化改革提高國(guó)有企業(yè)生產(chǎn)效率,推動(dòng)金融體系市場(chǎng)化改革以解決民營(yíng)企業(yè)融資約束問題,從追求區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)總量平衡的政策轉(zhuǎn)向追求區(qū)域人均收入水平均衡的政策,取消戶籍政策,采用能更加全面反映經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展質(zhì)量的官員政績(jī)考核標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以打破地方保護(hù)主義和市場(chǎng)分割。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the theoretical framework of Brandt, Tombe and Zhu (2013), this paper extends the production function form to the Cobb Douglas production function containing low technical labor force and high technical labor force, and calculates the mismatch degree of resources between state-owned and non-state units in China for 1993-2012 years and the degree of mismatch between the provinces and their resources. The specific reasons for the misallocation of human resources and their coping strategies are analyzed. It is found that the degree of misallocation of resources in China has declined since 2000, especially in the 2000-2007 Years, and the allocation efficiency of resources is greatly improved, which is the capital allocation between state-owned and non-state-owned units. The degree of mismatch between the provinces led to the increase in efficiency has risen in the.1997-2003 year, and a slight decline after 2004. This is mainly reflected in the change in the allocation efficiency between the low skilled labor force and the high-tech labor force among the provinces. The mismatch degree of capital and low technology labor force is high, the mismatch of high technology labor force is low. The mismatch of this mismatch is becoming more and more important in the total mismatch of capital. The mismatch of the low skilled labor force is embodied in the mismatch between the provinces and the provinces.2001 years after the mismatch. The mismatch of the high technology labor force in the province, the mismatch between the provinces and the provinces, the high technology labor in the.1996-2004 year, the high technical labor force is in the state-owned and non state. There is a significant increase in the efficiency of the allocation between units. There is no obvious change in the allocation efficiency after 2005. The efficiency of the allocation of high technology labor force between the provinces has declined slightly in.1996-2001 years, but the allocation efficiency is gradually improved after 2002. The reform of state-owned enterprises and the opening to the outside world are the efficiency of the allocation of human resources between state-owned and non-state-owned units. In order to improve the efficiency of human resources allocation, we should gradually eliminate the entry barrier caused by administrative monopoly and improve the production of state-owned enterprises through market-oriented reform to improve the efficiency of human resources allocation. Efficiency, promoting the market-oriented reform of the financial system to solve the financing constraints of private enterprises, from the policy of pursuing the balance of regional economy to the policy of pursuing the equilibrium of regional per capita income, the abolition of the household registration policy, and the adoption of the official performance assessment standard which can more fully reflect the quality of the economic and social development to break the local protectionism And market segmentation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F249.21

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 申明浩;劉文勝;;服務(wù)業(yè)開放對(duì)制造業(yè)資源錯(cuò)配效應(yīng)研究——基于工業(yè)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)庫的實(shí)證分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2016年11期

2 余靜文;;匯率變動(dòng)與資源錯(cuò)配——基于中國(guó)工業(yè)行業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2016年10期

3 王熙麟;;人口流動(dòng)和中國(guó)各地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)收斂[J];寧夏師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年05期

4 王磊;王康;;地區(qū)特征與中國(guó)地區(qū)間相對(duì)價(jià)格水平收斂性[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年08期

5 季書涵;朱英明;張?chǎng)?;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚對(duì)資源錯(cuò)配的改善效果研究[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年06期

6 陸銘;;教育、城市與大國(guó)發(fā)展——中國(guó)跨越中等收入陷阱的區(qū)域戰(zhàn)略[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2016年01期

7 王宋濤;溫思美;朱騰騰;;市場(chǎng)分割、資源錯(cuò)配與勞動(dòng)收入份額[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2016年01期

8 劉揚(yáng);梁峰;;不同類型單位工資的顯式與潛在差距[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年08期

9 王文;孫早;牛澤東;;資源配置與中國(guó)非農(nóng)部門全要素生產(chǎn)率——基于制造業(yè)和服務(wù)業(yè)之間資源錯(cuò)配的分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2015年07期

10 蓋慶恩;朱喜;程名望;史清華;;要素市場(chǎng)扭曲、壟斷勢(shì)力與全要素生產(chǎn)率[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1973413