本文選題：營銷能力 + 品牌價值　； 參考：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟全球化的到來,加劇了市場環(huán)境的競爭程度。營銷能力作為企業(yè)核心能力之一,反映了企業(yè)在市場競爭中的生存能力,其重要性對企業(yè)的發(fā)展和壯大不言而喻。目前學(xué)術(shù)界很多學(xué)者從不同方面研究了營銷能力對企業(yè)價值產(chǎn)生的積極影響。但經(jīng)過對現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)的整理匯總可以發(fā)現(xiàn):品牌價值在營銷能力與企業(yè)價值關(guān)系中的作用并未受到重視,原因是學(xué)者們往往認(rèn)為營銷能力的直觀作用即為產(chǎn)品銷售和利潤水平的提高,從而造成對營銷能力、品牌價值和企業(yè)價值三者關(guān)系的研究較為薄弱。此外,從國內(nèi)外各大品牌機構(gòu)公布的品牌價值排名可以看出:國有企業(yè)品牌建設(shè)水平遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)高于非國有企業(yè)。本文以此為切入點,在研究品牌價值對營銷能力和企業(yè)價值關(guān)系的中介作用的同時,探究國有企業(yè)和非國有企業(yè)在品牌建設(shè)中的差異,為我國企業(yè)發(fā)展與品牌壯大提供指導(dǎo)建議。本文采用實證研究方法,利用世界品牌實驗室公布的歷年《中國500最具價值品牌》榜單數(shù)據(jù)以及國泰安和RESSET銳思數(shù)據(jù)庫中的企業(yè)財務(wù)數(shù)據(jù),形成共174家企業(yè)10年間的非平衡面板樣本。通過投入——產(chǎn)出原則利用數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)(DEA)方法計算出樣本企業(yè)的營銷能力;構(gòu)建多元線性回歸模型,使用stata軟件進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計分析。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):營銷能力不僅會對企業(yè)價值和品牌價值產(chǎn)生正向影響,且品牌價值在二者關(guān)系中起到了部分中介作用。這表明企業(yè)在發(fā)展壯大過程中,品牌起到了重要的推動作用,管理層必須要充分認(rèn)識到企業(yè)營銷能力提升的重要性。研究結(jié)果還表明:相對于非國有企業(yè),國有企業(yè)營銷能力對品牌價值的正向作用更強。對此,國家可以在宏觀層面制定相關(guān)政策以指導(dǎo)非國有企業(yè),尤其是民營企業(yè)品牌建設(shè),如成立專項民營企業(yè)品牌建設(shè)扶持項目;微觀層面,企業(yè)自身需努力提高營銷等核心能力來實現(xiàn)品牌和企業(yè)整體價值的提升。
[Abstract]:The arrival of economic globalization, intensified the competition degree of market environment. As one of the core competence of the enterprise, the marketing ability reflects the survival ability of the enterprise in the market competition, and its importance is self-evident to the development and growth of the enterprise. At present, many scholars in academic circles have studied the positive influence of marketing ability on enterprise value from different aspects. However, by summarizing the existing literature, we can find that the role of brand value in the relationship between marketing ability and enterprise value has not been paid attention to. The reason is that scholars often think that the intuitive role of marketing ability is the improvement of product sales and profit level, which leads to weak research on the relationship among marketing ability, brand value and enterprise value. In addition, it can be seen from the ranking of brand value published by major domestic and foreign brands that the level of brand construction of state-owned enterprises is much higher than that of non-state-owned enterprises. This paper takes this as the breakthrough point, while studying the intermediary function of brand value to marketing ability and enterprise value, and probes into the difference between state-owned enterprise and non-state-owned enterprise in brand construction. To provide guidance for the development of Chinese enterprises and brand growth. In this paper, the empirical research method is used to make use of the list of "China's 500 most valuable brands" published by the World Brand Laboratory and the financial data of the companies in Cathay and RESSET database. Formed a total of 174 enterprises over the 10-year non-balanced panel sample. Through the input-output principle, the marketing ability of the sample enterprises is calculated by using the data envelopment method, and the multivariate linear regression model is constructed, and the data statistical analysis is carried out by using stata software. The results show that the marketing ability not only has a positive impact on the enterprise value and brand value, but also plays a part of intermediary role in the relationship between the two. This indicates that the brand plays an important role in the process of development and expansion of enterprises, and the management must fully realize the importance of enhancing the marketing ability of enterprises. The results also show that the marketing ability of SOEs has a stronger positive effect on brand value than that of non-state-owned enterprises. In this regard, the state can formulate relevant policies at the macro level to guide the brand building of non-state-owned enterprises, especially private enterprises, such as the establishment of special private enterprise brand building support projects; micro-level, Enterprises themselves need to improve their core competence, such as marketing, to achieve brand and corporate value.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F274;F275

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張小有;黃冰冰;周曉盼;;上市公司無形資產(chǎn)與企業(yè)價值相關(guān)性分析[J];會計之友;2016年10期

2 郭倩倩;胡兵;;企業(yè)社會績效、營銷能力與企業(yè)財務(wù)績效——基于2010-2014年中國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];華東經(jīng)濟管理;2016年05期

3 張紅;周智雄;莊伯超;;營銷能力對企業(yè)的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響——基于我國中小板上市企業(yè)的實證研究[J];科技管理研究;2015年07期

4 張瑞琦;寧德煌;;云南省著名品牌價值變化趨勢研究[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2014年02期

5 余相國;;企業(yè)市場營銷能力及其績效影響研究[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2013年08期

6 游婷婷;;我國中小企業(yè)核心競爭力提升對策研究[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2012年19期

7 胡彥蓉;吳沖;劉洪久;;企業(yè)社會績效與品牌金融價值關(guān)系的實證研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟;2012年07期

8 張少華;張少軍;;經(jīng)濟全球化與中國的自主研發(fā)優(yōu)勢[J];科研管理;2012年06期

9 李德立;張海燕;;品牌資產(chǎn)與企業(yè)價值的實證研究[J];東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年01期

10 劉曄;;企業(yè)能力理論體系及其內(nèi)在邏輯關(guān)聯(lián)[J];延安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉瑤;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)品牌簡約個性對于企業(yè)價值的影響研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

2 馮丹靜;營銷能力、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和企業(yè)績效的關(guān)系研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

3 谷燕;我國上市公司多元化并購績效研究[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1903040