【摘要】：全球治理需要國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo),但國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的赤字由來已久。特朗普總統(tǒng)的當(dāng)選以及他所主張的"美國優(yōu)先"的內(nèi)外政策讓國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的赤字問題更加凸顯。作者將對(duì)國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)這一問題進(jìn)行深入的討論,分析國內(nèi)外已有的研究,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的概念以及國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的目標(biāo)、手段、方式、領(lǐng)域、績效和合法性問題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的梳理。作者進(jìn)而對(duì)冷戰(zhàn)后美國的國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)實(shí)踐進(jìn)行了簡要的評(píng)估,區(qū)分了不同時(shí)期的美國政府所采取的國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)模式,并指出了各自所存在的問題,認(rèn)為現(xiàn)在中國面臨的核心問題不是要不要參與國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo),而是如何理解并進(jìn)行國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的問題。為此,中國應(yīng)該構(gòu)建具有中國特色的協(xié)進(jìn)型國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)角色。這一角色將強(qiáng)調(diào)國際協(xié)作領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、共進(jìn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、吸引領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、賦權(quán)領(lǐng)導(dǎo),以便在積極參與國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的供給的同時(shí),避免國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)等同于霸權(quán)或支配性領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的誤區(qū)、國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)等同于自利領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的誤區(qū)、國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)等同于強(qiáng)制領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的誤區(qū)以及國際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)等同于包辦領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的誤區(qū)。
[Abstract]:Global governance requires international leadership, but the deficit of international leadership has a long history. The election of President Trump and his "U.S. priority" internal and external policies have made the deficit problem of international leadership all the more prominent. The author will discuss the problem of international leadership in depth, analyze the existing research at home and abroad, and on this basis, the concept of international leadership and the objectives, means, methods and fields of international leadership. The problems of performance and legitimacy are systematically combed. The author then makes a brief assessment of the practice of international leadership in the United States after the Cold War, distinguishes the international leadership models adopted by the American government in different periods, and points out their own existing problems. It is believed that the core question facing China now is not whether to participate in international leadership, but how to understand and carry out international leadership. To this end, China should build a cooperative international leadership role with Chinese characteristics. This role will emphasize international collaborative leadership, joint leadership, attract leadership and empower leadership in order to avoid the misunderstanding that international leadership is equated with hegemonic or dominant leadership while actively participating in the supply of international leadership. International leadership is equivalent to the misunderstanding of self-interest leadership, international leadership is equivalent to compulsory leadership and international leadership is equivalent to arranged leadership.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)國際關(guān)系與公共事務(wù)學(xué)院;
【基金】：2011年國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大課題“中國特色外交理論研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):11&ZD074)的資助
【分類號(hào)】：D822;D871.2
，

本文編號(hào)：2491777