【摘要】：政府績效審計(jì)是現(xiàn)代審計(jì)的高級形態(tài),是當(dāng)代社會政府審計(jì)的發(fā)展趨勢。目前世界上大多數(shù)國家不僅將績效審計(jì)工作應(yīng)用到政府審計(jì)的絕大部分領(lǐng)域,而且形成了完整的理論體系,積累了一定的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)。雖然政府績效審計(jì)工作已被確立為我國政府的主要職責(zé),并取得一定的發(fā)展,但隨著我國政府公共支出規(guī)模的不斷擴(kuò)大且長期存在著浪費(fèi)的現(xiàn)象,因此,積極推進(jìn)績效審計(jì)發(fā)展以滿足社會公眾對政府責(zé)任及效能的關(guān)注已經(jīng)成為不容忽視的客觀要求。與西方發(fā)達(dá)國家相比,我國政府績效審計(jì)的發(fā)展還存在不足之處,如績效審計(jì)理論仍不完善,審計(jì)依據(jù)不夠充分,技術(shù)方法落后,審計(jì)效果不理想等問題。因此向其他國家借鑒政府績效審計(jì)的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)以提高我國政府的效能是非常有必要的。本文首先通過規(guī)范研究方法對美國、法國、德國以及中國政府績效審計(jì)發(fā)展階段以及審計(jì)體制模式進(jìn)行總體概況及綜合評述。其次運(yùn)用比較研究法對績效審計(jì)的內(nèi)容、范圍、實(shí)施程序、方法以及結(jié)果進(jìn)行橫向?qū)Ρ?并分析中國與其他國家間發(fā)展存在的差異及問題。再次利用問卷調(diào)查的方法對影響我國政府績效審計(jì)的因素進(jìn)行調(diào)研。最后通過借鑒西方國家成功的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)并結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)實(shí)國情,從以下方面提出改進(jìn)建議:轉(zhuǎn)換審計(jì)理念、改革審計(jì)體制模式、規(guī)范審計(jì)程序、豐富審計(jì)方法、提高審計(jì)隊(duì)伍的質(zhì)量建設(shè)以及完善審計(jì)公告和責(zé)任追查制度。以期完善我國政府績效審計(jì)的理論,促進(jìn)其實(shí)踐的發(fā)展。本文共分七個(gè)部分對上述內(nèi)容予以闡述,分為緒論、政府績效審計(jì)的概念及基本理論、四種不同審計(jì)體制模式概況及評述、運(yùn)行機(jī)制的中外比較分析、我國現(xiàn)階段發(fā)展過程存在的不足與問題、完善我國政府績效審計(jì)的建議和結(jié)論以及展望。
[Abstract]:Government performance audit is the advanced form of modern auditing and the development trend of contemporary government audit. At present, most countries in the world not only apply performance audit to most fields of government audit, but also form a complete theoretical system and accumulate certain practical experience. Although the government performance audit has been established as the main responsibility of our government, and has made certain development, but with the continuous expansion of the scale of government public expenditure and long-term waste phenomenon, therefore, Actively promoting the development of performance audit to meet the public concern about government responsibility and effectiveness has become an objective requirement that can not be ignored. Compared with the western developed countries, the development of the performance audit of our country still has some shortcomings, such as the theory of the performance audit is still not perfect, the audit basis is not enough, the technical method is backward, the audit effect is not ideal and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to learn from the successful experience of government performance audit in other countries to improve the efficiency of our government. In this paper, the general situation of the development stage and the audit system model of the government performance audit in the United States, France, Germany and China are reviewed through normative research methods. Secondly, the content, scope, implementation procedure, methods and results of performance audit are compared horizontally with comparative research method, and the differences and problems between China and other countries are analyzed. Thirdly, the factors influencing the performance audit of our government are investigated by using the method of questionnaire. Finally, by drawing lessons from the successful development experience of western countries and combining with the actual situation of our country, the paper puts forward some suggestions for improvement from the following aspects: changing audit idea, reforming audit system mode, standardizing audit procedure, enriching audit method. Improve the quality of the audit team and improve the audit announcement and accountability tracking system. In order to improve the theory of government performance audit, promote the development of its practice. This article is divided into seven parts to elaborate the above contents, including introduction, concept and basic theory of government performance audit, general situation and comment of four different audit system models, and comparative analysis of operation mechanism between China and foreign countries. The deficiencies and problems existing in the development process of our country at present, the suggestions and conclusions of improving the performance audit of our government and the prospect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F239.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周維培;;德國聯(lián)邦審計(jì)院的司法特征及樣本意義[J];審計(jì)研究;2016年03期

2 林忠華;;外國審計(jì)機(jī)關(guān)績效審計(jì)探析[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年02期

3 于海琳;;論美國審計(jì)結(jié)果公告制度及其啟示[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年05期

4 張穎;;淺談?wù)畬徲?jì)的主要模式[J];中國鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)會計(jì);2015年07期

5 林忠華;;發(fā)達(dá)國家的政府績效審計(jì)及其啟示[J];長江論壇;2015年02期

6 林忠華;;外國審計(jì)機(jī)關(guān)績效審計(jì)探析[J];河南商業(yè)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

7 陸曉暉;;美國審計(jì)署審計(jì)報(bào)告要素及其借鑒[J];中國內(nèi)部審計(jì);2015年04期

8 王會金;;國外后新公共管理運(yùn)動與我國政府績效審計(jì)發(fā)展創(chuàng)新研究[J];會計(jì)研究;2014年10期

9 陳獻(xiàn)東;;國家審計(jì)服務(wù)全面深化改革研究[J];審計(jì)月刊;2014年10期

10 郭笑春;;法國審計(jì)法院對總統(tǒng)辦公室審計(jì)的啟示[J];中國內(nèi)部審計(jì);2014年10期

，

本文編號：2367464