本文選題：綠色EVA + 價(jià)值相關(guān)性�。� 參考：《北京交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：基于環(huán)境污染的現(xiàn)實(shí)背景,可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略提出的政策背景,在宏觀層面,各國(guó)把生態(tài)環(huán)境的保護(hù)以及社會(huì)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展作為經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的努力方向,在微觀層面,企業(yè)尤其是大企業(yè)把自身的可持續(xù)發(fā)展作為企業(yè)成長(zhǎng)的迫切追求。生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)中的環(huán)境保護(hù)和提高資源利用率是企業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的必然要求,因此企業(yè)的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)也應(yīng)該相應(yīng)地引入環(huán)境因素作為評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。基于國(guó)資委出臺(tái)的EVA考核辦法,我們研究了考慮了環(huán)境因素后的企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo),即綠色EVA指標(biāo)的構(gòu)建和價(jià)值相關(guān)性研究。本文采用規(guī)范研究、案例研究以及實(shí)證研究相結(jié)合的方法,通過(guò)規(guī)范研究和案例研究完成指標(biāo)構(gòu)建,并通過(guò)實(shí)證研究初步證明綠色EVA指標(biāo)的價(jià)值相關(guān)性,其中,指標(biāo)的構(gòu)建是以傳統(tǒng)EVA為基礎(chǔ),通過(guò)定義貢獻(xiàn)環(huán)境成本,對(duì)傳統(tǒng)EVA進(jìn)行調(diào)整而得到的。本文的研究成果如下:(1)構(gòu)建了在當(dāng)前具有可操作性的綠色EVA指標(biāo)。從傳統(tǒng)的EVA值出發(fā),首先定義貢獻(xiàn)環(huán)境成本,然后區(qū)分資本化貢獻(xiàn)環(huán)境成本和費(fèi)用化貢獻(xiàn)環(huán)境成本,按照資本化部分和費(fèi)用化部分對(duì)EVA計(jì)算影響的不同,分別計(jì)算資本化調(diào)整值和費(fèi)用化調(diào)整值,從而得出對(duì)傳統(tǒng)EVA調(diào)整值,進(jìn)一步得出綠色EVA值。(2)案例的方式展示指標(biāo)計(jì)算和應(yīng)用,并利用構(gòu)建的綠色EVA計(jì)算方法計(jì)算出41家企業(yè)的綠色EVA數(shù)值。以河鋼股份為例,對(duì)構(gòu)建的指標(biāo)計(jì)算過(guò)程進(jìn)行中展示,初步證明指標(biāo)的有用性,并通過(guò)該計(jì)算方法計(jì)算出41家企業(yè)的綠色EVA值,用于進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步研究。(3)利用計(jì)算出的綠色EVA值進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究,以證明綠色EVA指標(biāo)和企業(yè)價(jià)值的相關(guān)性。首先進(jìn)行相對(duì)信息含量和增量信息含量研究,證明了綠色EVA具有更高的相對(duì)信息含量同時(shí)也具有增量信息含量。其次,綠色EVA、傳統(tǒng)EVA和傳統(tǒng)財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)分別對(duì)企業(yè)價(jià)值的解釋力度進(jìn)行比較,證明綠色EVA指標(biāo)和傳統(tǒng)EVA指標(biāo)一樣有效,并且綠色EVA和傳統(tǒng)財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)結(jié)合的綜合評(píng)價(jià)更有效。本文的研究意義在于:(1)可操作的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)。相比目前許多關(guān)于考慮了環(huán)境因素的指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建后不具有可操作性的現(xiàn)狀,本文構(gòu)建綠色EVA的直接意義在于提供了一個(gè)具有可操作性的考慮了環(huán)境因素的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)。(2)改善企業(yè)現(xiàn)行績(jī)效考核,充實(shí)我國(guó)財(cái)務(wù)管理體系和內(nèi)容�，F(xiàn)有的績(jī)效考核指標(biāo)大都忽視了對(duì)環(huán)境影響的考慮,考核目標(biāo)具有短期性。針對(duì)這種現(xiàn)狀,近年來(lái)綠色財(cái)務(wù)管理體系的提出顯得意義重大,而EVA在業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)體系中的作用,決定了綠色EVA必將成為綠色財(cái)務(wù)管理體系的重要組成部分,完善企業(yè)的業(yè)績(jī)考核指標(biāo),豐富和充實(shí)我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的財(cái)務(wù)管理體系,尤其是綠色財(cái)務(wù)管理體系。(3)鼓勵(lì)加大環(huán)保投資力度,引導(dǎo)企業(yè)貫徹可持續(xù)發(fā)展的理念。因?yàn)榭紤]環(huán)保因素后的綠色EVA能使重視環(huán)境保護(hù)、環(huán)保投資較多、環(huán)保得分較高的企業(yè)因多投入環(huán)保支出EVA增加,有助于鼓勵(lì)企業(yè)自覺(jué)加大環(huán)保投資力度,改進(jìn)了傳統(tǒng)EVA評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)在環(huán)保激勵(lì)方面的不足。通過(guò)為企業(yè)提供了一套更加符合企業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)體系,引導(dǎo)企業(yè)貫徹環(huán)境保護(hù)和可持續(xù)發(fā)展的理念。
[Abstract]:Based on the realistic background of environmental pollution and the policy background of sustainable development strategy, at the macro level, the protection of the ecological environment and the sustainable development of the society are the direction of economic development. At the micro level, enterprises, especially large enterprises, take their sustainable development as an urgent pursuit of enterprise growth. The environmental protection in the camp and the improvement of the utilization of resources are the necessary requirements for the sustainable development of the enterprise. Therefore, the enterprise performance evaluation should also be introduced to the environmental factors as the evaluation standard. Based on the EVA assessment method issued by the SASAC, we have studied the performance evaluation index of the enterprise after considering the environmental factors, that is, the construction of green EVA index. Based on normative research, case study and empirical research, this paper completes index construction through normative research and case study, and proves the value relevance of green EVA indicators through empirical research. The construction of the index is based on the traditional EVA and defines the cost of the contribution by defining the environment. The research results of the traditional EVA are as follows: (1) a green EVA index, which is operable at present, is constructed. Starting from the traditional EVA value, the contribution environment cost is first defined, then the environmental cost and the cost contribution environment of the capitalization contribution are differentiated, and the capitalization part and the cost part are made to the EVA. The adjustment value of capitalization and the cost adjustment value are calculated separately, thus the adjustment value of the traditional EVA is obtained, and the green EVA value is further obtained. (2) the example of the case is calculated and applied, and the green EVA value of the 41 enterprises is calculated by using the green EVA calculation method constructed. The index of the construction of the River Steel shares is taken as an example. The calculation process is demonstrated, and the usefulness of the index is preliminarily proved, and the green EVA value of 41 enterprises is calculated by this calculation method. (3) using the calculated green EVA value for empirical study to prove the correlation between the green EVA index and the enterprise value. First, the relative information content and the incremental information are contained. The quantity study shows that green EVA has higher relative information content and also has incremental information content. Secondly, green EVA, traditional EVA and traditional financial indexes are compared to the explanation of enterprise value respectively. It is proved that green EVA index is as effective as the traditional EVA index, and the combination of green EVA and traditional financial index is a comprehensive evaluation. The value of the study is more effective. The significance of this paper is: (1) operational performance evaluation indicators. Compared with the current situation that many of the index systems that consider the environmental factors are not operable, the direct significance of the construction of green EVA is to provide an operational evaluation index of environmental factors. (2) In order to improve the current performance appraisal of the enterprise and enrich the financial management system and content of our country, the existing performance evaluation indexes mostly ignore the consideration of the environmental impact, and the assessment target is short term. In recent years, the introduction of the green financial management system is significant, and the role of EVA in the performance evaluation system has decided green. Color EVA will become an important part of the green financial management system, improve the performance evaluation index of the enterprise, enrich and enrich the existing financial management system in our country, especially the green financial management system. (3) encourage the strengthening of environmental investment and guide the enterprise to carry out the concept of sustainable development. The green EVA after consideration of environmental protection factors The enterprises which can pay more attention to environmental protection, more environmental protection investment and higher environmental protection score have increased their investment in environmental protection expenditure EVA, which helps to encourage enterprises to consciously increase investment in environmental protection and improves the shortage of traditional EVA evaluation indicators in environmental incentives. To guide enterprises to implement the concept of environmental protection and sustainable development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F426.31;F406.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹茂蓮;張莉莉;查浩;;國(guó)內(nèi)外實(shí)施綠色GDP核算的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及啟示[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2014年04期

2 宋良榮;江紅;;基于經(jīng)濟(jì)增加值的企業(yè)全面預(yù)算管理研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2014年01期

3 杜陽(yáng);;基于經(jīng)濟(jì)增加值的中央企業(yè)集團(tuán)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)應(yīng)用研究[J];財(cái)務(wù)與會(huì)計(jì);2014年01期

4 池國(guó)華;王志;楊金;;EVA考核提升了企業(yè)價(jià)值嗎?——來(lái)自中國(guó)國(guó)有上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2013年11期

5 李葳葳;;生態(tài)環(huán)境價(jià)值的提出與實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑[J];海峽科學(xué);2013年05期

6 劉鳳委;李琦;;市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、EVA評(píng)價(jià)與企業(yè)過(guò)度投資[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2013年02期

7 王利崗;;中央企業(yè)實(shí)行經(jīng)濟(jì)增加值考核的啟示[J];商業(yè)會(huì)計(jì);2013年03期

8 馬艷;嚴(yán)金強(qiáng);陳張良;;資源環(huán)境領(lǐng)域中“負(fù)價(jià)值”的理論界定與應(yīng)用模型[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2012年11期

9 趙巖;陳金龍;;央企經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)的EVA評(píng)價(jià)有效性研究[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2012年06期

10 張先治;李琦;;基于EVA的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)對(duì)央企過(guò)度投資行為影響的實(shí)證分析[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2012年05期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 楊婷蓉;;綠色EVA:基于標(biāo)準(zhǔn)生態(tài)效率的經(jīng)濟(jì)增加值[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)管理會(huì)計(jì)與應(yīng)用專業(yè)委員會(huì)2013年學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 方巍;環(huán)境價(jià)值論[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李念秋;基于MVA的上市公司財(cái)務(wù)預(yù)警實(shí)證研究[D];杭州電子科技大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2083663