本文選題：政府整體性　切入點(diǎn)：項(xiàng)目制　出處：《湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：近幾十年來(lái),西方國(guó)家和中國(guó)政府內(nèi)部都通過(guò)引入績(jī)效管理來(lái)提升效率,但也帶來(lái)對(duì)政府整體性的損害。相比于西方早已在理論和實(shí)踐上展開(kāi)糾正,中國(guó)研究界和實(shí)務(wù)界還缺少反思,學(xué)術(shù)界的政府內(nèi)部治理研究偏重于策略性治理,忽視了對(duì)維護(hù)政府整體性必不可少的忠誠(chéng)性治理。以"忠誠(chéng)性-策略性"治理機(jī)制二分法為分析框架,結(jié)合中國(guó)政府體系的"條-塊"結(jié)構(gòu)特征,對(duì)已受學(xué)界關(guān)注的項(xiàng)目制、行政發(fā)包制等四種政府內(nèi)部主要治理方式所包含的治理機(jī)制組合進(jìn)行初步分析,認(rèn)為:忠誠(chéng)性治理在政府內(nèi)部治理中與策略性治理具有同等重要性;作為兩種治理機(jī)制的不同組合,四種治理方式具有不同的治理效率特征,它們相互補(bǔ)充,共同組成了當(dāng)前中國(guó)政府內(nèi)部治理格局;忠誠(chéng)性治理在改革開(kāi)放后基本未得發(fā)展,落后于社會(huì)環(huán)境和政府內(nèi)治理格局的變化。
[Abstract]:In recent decades, both western countries and Chinese governments have introduced performance management to improve efficiency, but it has also caused damage to the government as a whole.Compared with the correction in theory and practice in the West, there is still a lack of reflection in Chinese research and practice. The research on internal governance in academic circles is focused on strategic governance and neglects the loyalty governance which is necessary to maintain the integrity of government.Based on the dichotomy of "loyalty-strategic" governance mechanism and the structural characteristics of "strip-block" of Chinese government system, this paper analyzes the project system which has attracted the attention of academic circles.This paper makes a preliminary analysis of the combination of governance mechanisms contained in the four main forms of governance within the government, such as the administrative contract system, and holds that: loyalty governance is as important as strategic governance in government internal governance;As different combinations of the two governance mechanisms, the four governance modes have different governance efficiency characteristics, which complement each other and form the current internal governance pattern of the Chinese government; loyalty governance has not been developed since the reform and opening up.Lag behind the social environment and the change of governance pattern within the government.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)系;北京市社會(huì)科學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D630

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王立軍;政府應(yīng)該服務(wù)誰(shuí):公民還是顧客[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)論叢;2005年02期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 靳環(huán)宇 中央政府駐港聯(lián)絡(luò)辦深圳培訓(xùn)調(diào)研中心;他治·自治·互治·善治[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)報(bào);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1714800