本文選題：土地征收　切入點(diǎn)：權(quán)利保護(hù)　出處：《渤海大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在發(fā)展中國(guó)家不斷進(jìn)行工業(yè)化和城鎮(zhèn)化的進(jìn)程中,征收和使用土地是必不可少的一項(xiàng)內(nèi)容,因而發(fā)生在征地中的爭(zhēng)端和糾紛紛至沓來(lái)。這不僅僅是一個(gè)當(dāng)前各國(guó)都普遍存在的問(wèn)題,我國(guó)作為世界上最大的發(fā)展中國(guó)家,目前的土地法律制度較國(guó)外發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家還是比較落后和不完善,在征地過(guò)程中不重視對(duì)被征收人的權(quán)利保護(hù),導(dǎo)致征地糾紛不斷發(fā)生�，F(xiàn)階段隨著社會(huì)法治理念的普及,個(gè)人權(quán)利意識(shí)的加強(qiáng),更應(yīng)該注重和完善在征地過(guò)程中對(duì)被征收人權(quán)利的保護(hù)。文章采用的是案例分析法、文獻(xiàn)研究法、調(diào)查研究法和比較法研究。案例分析法主要是選取實(shí)踐中真實(shí)的案例,剖析存在的問(wèn)題及爭(zhēng)議點(diǎn)。文獻(xiàn)研究法主要是研究國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于土地征收的文獻(xiàn)及相關(guān)最新的法律法規(guī)。調(diào)查研究法主要是主要是采用調(diào)查問(wèn)卷和深度訪談的方式進(jìn)行研究。比較法研究主要是通過(guò)研究國(guó)外土地征收立法在公益性界定、土地征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、爭(zhēng)議救濟(jì)方式等內(nèi)容與我國(guó)的對(duì)比,做出分析的方法。文章首先介紹了一起我國(guó)農(nóng)村土地征收過(guò)程中與土地被征收人引發(fā)的糾紛導(dǎo)入,總結(jié)出從該案所發(fā)現(xiàn)的爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題,其次通過(guò)對(duì)該案主要的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行法理分析,揭示目前我國(guó)對(duì)土地被征收人權(quán)利保護(hù)的欠缺,分為實(shí)體性權(quán)益、程序性權(quán)益和救濟(jì)性權(quán)益。再次,通過(guò)借鑒國(guó)外發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家和國(guó)際金融公司《環(huán)境和社會(huì)可持續(xù)性政策和績(jī)效標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》在征地過(guò)程中對(duì)土地被征收人的權(quán)利保障的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),從中得到啟發(fā),最后,對(duì)癥下藥,對(duì)我國(guó)完善對(duì)土地被征收人權(quán)利的保障和救濟(jì)機(jī)制提供若干建議。
[Abstract]:The expropriation and use of land is an essential element in the ongoing process of industrialization and urbanization in developing countries, As a result, disputes and disputes in land expropriation have sprung up. This is not only a common problem in all countries at present. China, as the largest developing country in the world, The present land legal system is still more backward and imperfect than that of the developed countries abroad. In the process of land expropriation, the protection of the rights of the expropriated persons is not attached importance to, which leads to the continuous occurrence of land expropriation disputes. At the present stage, with the popularization of the concept of the rule of law in society, In order to strengthen the consciousness of individual rights, we should pay more attention to and perfect the protection of the rights of the expropriated people in the process of land expropriation. The case analysis method is mainly to select the real cases in practice. The methods of literature research are mainly about the literature about land expropriation and the latest laws and regulations at home and abroad. The methods of investigation and research are mainly by means of questionnaire and in-depth interview. Carry on the research. The comparative law research is mainly through the research foreign land expropriation legislation in the public welfare definition, The compensation standard of land expropriation, the way of dispute relief and so on are compared with our country, and the methods of analysis are made. Firstly, the article introduces the introduction of a dispute between the land expropriator and the land expropriator in the process of land expropriation in our country. Summing up the dispute problems found in this case, secondly, through the legal analysis of the main controversial issues in this case, it reveals the lack of protection of the rights of land expropriated persons in our country at present, which is divided into substantive rights and interests. Thirdly, by drawing lessons from the experience of foreign developed countries and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) on the protection of the rights of land expropriated persons in the process of land expropriation, the Environmental and Social Sustainability Policy and performance Standards are used for reference. Finally, some suggestions are given to improve the protection and relief mechanism of land expropriated persons' rights in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：渤海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 石子偉;;新型城鎮(zhèn)化與農(nóng)民權(quán)益關(guān)系探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年06期

2 葉必豐;;城鎮(zhèn)化中土地征收補(bǔ)償?shù)钠降仍瓌t[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2014年03期

3 鄧楚開(kāi);王綠英;;土地征收的基本理念與原則[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年16期

4 陳小君;;農(nóng)村集體土地征收的法理反思與制度重構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2012年01期

5 王靜;;美國(guó)土地征收程序研究[J];公法研究;2011年02期

6 錢曉燕;徐凝;;德國(guó)的土地征收程序[J];河北企業(yè);2008年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1561626