商業(yè)銀行系統(tǒng)性風險測度與宏觀審慎監(jiān)管
發(fā)布時間:2018-08-13 15:41
【摘要】:在金融市場上,商業(yè)銀行面臨的風險不僅受自身因素影響,還受到由經(jīng)濟周期、國家宏觀經(jīng)濟政策的變動、外部金融沖擊等風險因素的作用,這種出于銀行部門間的相關性,造成不同銀行間,乃至商業(yè)銀行同整個銀行系統(tǒng)間的風險傳導,致使風險從單個銀行向整個銀行系統(tǒng)的擴散稱之為商業(yè)銀行系統(tǒng)性風險。2008年爆發(fā)的金融危機,使得這種具備隱匿性、積累性和傳染性,會對銀行部門乃至實體經(jīng)濟帶來巨大的負外部性效應,并且不能通過一般的風險管理手段相互抵消或者削弱的系統(tǒng)性風險成為國內(nèi)外學術界和政府部門關注的焦點。為了合理測度中國商業(yè)銀行系統(tǒng)性風險的大小,為宏觀審慎監(jiān)管構建監(jiān)管指標,本文首先采用Adian和Brunnermeier 2009年提出的CoVaR方法,利用2007年11月16日至2014年2月7日12家上市的商業(yè)銀行收盤價的周數(shù)據(jù),通過分位數(shù)回歸法測度各上市銀行對于銀行系統(tǒng)的風險貢獻度,之后選取國有商業(yè)銀行和股份制銀行中具有代表性的建設銀行和浦發(fā)銀行,利用即得的VaR和CCoVaR數(shù)據(jù),兼之兩家銀行的資產(chǎn)報酬率、不良貸款率、資產(chǎn)總額、權益乘數(shù)以及GDP增長率等有關數(shù)據(jù),構建主成分方程,按照累計貢獻度大于85%的原則,選取了第一、第二和第三主成分,進一步構建考慮自回歸和滯后的EGARCH模型,實證結果顯示:t-i期的CoVaR、GDP增長率、權益乘數(shù)和不良貸款率同t期的CoVaR之間存在反比例關系,t-i期的資產(chǎn)總額同t期的CoVaR呈正比例關系,且不良貸款率與資產(chǎn)總額對當期CoVaR的影響最大,在i=1(滯后一季度)的情況下,上述變量對建設銀行當前CoVaR的解釋力度最大,在i=2(滯后半年)的情況下,上述變量對浦發(fā)銀行CoVaR的解釋力度最大,監(jiān)管部門可根據(jù)上述變量的變動情況,對系統(tǒng)重要性銀行銀行未來一段時間風險的變動情況進行有的放矢的監(jiān)控。
[Abstract]:In the financial market, the risks faced by commercial banks are affected not only by their own factors, but also by risk factors such as economic cycles, changes in national macroeconomic policies, external financial shocks, and so on. Causing risk transmission between different banks, and even between commercial banks and the whole banking system, leading to the spread of risk from a single bank to the entire banking system called systemic risk in commercial banks. The financial crisis broke out in 2008, Making this kind of latent, accumulative and contagious, will bring huge negative externalities to the banking sector and even to the real economy. And the systemic risk which can not be offset or weakened by the general risk management means has become the focus of academic and governmental attention at home and abroad. In order to reasonably measure the systemic risk of Chinese commercial banks and construct the supervision index for macro-prudential supervision, this paper firstly adopts the CoVaR method proposed by Adian and Brunnermeier in 2009. Based on the weekly data of closing prices of 12 listed commercial banks from November 16, 2007 to February 7, 2014, the risk contribution of each listed bank to the banking system was measured by quantile regression method. Then select the representative state-owned commercial banks and joint-stock banks of China Construction Bank and Shanghai Development Bank, and use the obtained VaR and CCoVaR data, as well as the return on assets, non-performing loan ratio, total assets of the two banks. According to the principle of cumulative contribution greater than 85%, the first, second and third principal components are selected to further construct the EGARCH model considering autoregressions and hysteresis. The empirical results show that there is a inverse relationship between the growth rate of CoVaRN, the equity multiplier and the non-performing loan ratio and the CoVaR in t period. The total assets in t-I period are positively proportional to the CoVaR in t period. Non-performing loan ratio and total assets have the greatest influence on current CoVaR. In the case of ix1 (lag first quarter), the above variables explain the current CoVaR of CCB most strongly, and in the case of ix2 (lag half a year), The above variables explain the CoVaR of Pudong Development Bank most intensively. According to the change of these variables, regulators can monitor the risk of systemically important banks in a certain period of time.
【學位授予單位】:南京師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:F832.33
本文編號:2181429
[Abstract]:In the financial market, the risks faced by commercial banks are affected not only by their own factors, but also by risk factors such as economic cycles, changes in national macroeconomic policies, external financial shocks, and so on. Causing risk transmission between different banks, and even between commercial banks and the whole banking system, leading to the spread of risk from a single bank to the entire banking system called systemic risk in commercial banks. The financial crisis broke out in 2008, Making this kind of latent, accumulative and contagious, will bring huge negative externalities to the banking sector and even to the real economy. And the systemic risk which can not be offset or weakened by the general risk management means has become the focus of academic and governmental attention at home and abroad. In order to reasonably measure the systemic risk of Chinese commercial banks and construct the supervision index for macro-prudential supervision, this paper firstly adopts the CoVaR method proposed by Adian and Brunnermeier in 2009. Based on the weekly data of closing prices of 12 listed commercial banks from November 16, 2007 to February 7, 2014, the risk contribution of each listed bank to the banking system was measured by quantile regression method. Then select the representative state-owned commercial banks and joint-stock banks of China Construction Bank and Shanghai Development Bank, and use the obtained VaR and CCoVaR data, as well as the return on assets, non-performing loan ratio, total assets of the two banks. According to the principle of cumulative contribution greater than 85%, the first, second and third principal components are selected to further construct the EGARCH model considering autoregressions and hysteresis. The empirical results show that there is a inverse relationship between the growth rate of CoVaRN, the equity multiplier and the non-performing loan ratio and the CoVaR in t period. The total assets in t-I period are positively proportional to the CoVaR in t period. Non-performing loan ratio and total assets have the greatest influence on current CoVaR. In the case of ix1 (lag first quarter), the above variables explain the current CoVaR of CCB most strongly, and in the case of ix2 (lag half a year), The above variables explain the CoVaR of Pudong Development Bank most intensively. According to the change of these variables, regulators can monitor the risk of systemically important banks in a certain period of time.
【學位授予單位】:南京師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:F832.33
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前7條
1 成善棟,徐紅;金融全球化形勢下國有商業(yè)銀行的風險管理研究[J];金融論壇;2002年10期
2 苗永旺;王亮亮;;金融系統(tǒng)性風險與宏觀審慎監(jiān)管研究[J];國際金融研究;2010年08期
3 李守偉;何建敏;;銀行系統(tǒng)性風險研究綜述[J];南京航空航天大學學報(社會科學版);2009年03期
4 葉永剛;張培;;中國金融監(jiān)管指標體系構建研究[J];金融研究;2009年04期
5 李文泓;;關于宏觀審慎監(jiān)管框架下逆周期政策的探討[J];金融研究;2009年07期
6 張強;馮超;;金融危機后我國上市商業(yè)銀行系統(tǒng)性風險測算[J];上海金融;2010年12期
7 楊有振;王書華;;中國上市商業(yè)銀行系統(tǒng)性風險溢出效應分析——基于CoVaR技術的分位數(shù)估計[J];山西財經(jīng)大學學報;2013年07期
,本文編號:2181429
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/huobilw/2181429.html
最近更新
教材專著