基于演化博弈模型的網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款探析
本文選題:網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款 切入點:道德風險 出處:《湖南大學》2012年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:在資本市場上,由于信息不對稱,銀行放貸時面臨著逆向選擇、道德風險、審計成本和合約執(zhí)行四大難題。這些難題使得銀行選擇不向那些難以提供擔保和抵押的中小企業(yè)提供貸款,從而導致信貸市場失靈。而以往的研究已經(jīng)證明,聯(lián)保貸款對于信貸市場失靈發(fā)揮了重要作用。 聯(lián)保貸款從誕生至今的短短幾十年中,便因其驚人的高還款率對緩解貧困的卓越表現(xiàn)吸引了各界人士的廣泛關注。其中孟加拉鄉(xiāng)村銀行的成功受到各國政府的重視,,包括美國在內(nèi)的50多個發(fā)展中國家和發(fā)達國家紛紛效仿,試圖將這一新型的信貸模式移植本國。 正是受到Y(jié)unus教授聯(lián)保貸款模式的啟發(fā),同時,結(jié)合我國實際國情,中國建設銀行與阿里巴巴于2007年合作推出了一項無抵押無實物擔保的中小企業(yè)貸款模式——網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款。這一我國自主創(chuàng)新的新型貸款模式能否像聯(lián)保貸款一樣獲得成功,如果能成功,又是如何有效提高資本市場的資源配置效率就構(gòu)成了本文的主要研究目的。 本文旨在就網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款能否得到廣泛開展和影響資本配置原因的道德風險方面,從長期一般均衡角度,對網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款能否有效規(guī)避道德風險問題,從而緩解信貸市場的失靈,以及它是如何發(fā)揮作用的進行了探討。 為此,從長期演化角度,就聯(lián)保體內(nèi)企業(yè)間建立了兩個道德風險模型,對企業(yè)獲得貸款后的投資生產(chǎn)活動以及橫向監(jiān)督行為進行了分析,結(jié)果模型證明在長期一般均衡中,投資生產(chǎn)活動與短期聯(lián)保貸款的結(jié)論一致,能夠有效避免企業(yè)的“搭便車”行為,現(xiàn)有理論中的宣稱聯(lián)保貸款“搭便車”行為普遍盛行的說法是錯誤的。但在對橫向監(jiān)督行為的研究中發(fā)現(xiàn),其結(jié)論與聯(lián)保貸款不一致,在長期一般均衡中,網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款的橫向監(jiān)督行為存在嚴重的道德風險問題,“搭便車”行為普遍盛行。并且,就各因素變化從長期角度對博弈結(jié)果的影響進行了分析。 緊接著,從長期演化角度,就聯(lián)保體與銀行間是否愿意采取網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保模式進行貸款建立了一個博弈模型,分析得出網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款中的網(wǎng)絡信息披露機制使得聯(lián)保體傾向于不與銀行合作,即在長期角度,不愿意采取網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保進行貸款,這一結(jié)論為現(xiàn)實中網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款出現(xiàn)的叫座不叫好的情況提供了理論依據(jù)。 由于國內(nèi)相關研究的貧乏,本文研究結(jié)果將會對網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款今后的實踐發(fā)展及后續(xù)研究起到一定的借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:In the capital market, because of information asymmetry, banks are faced with adverse selection and moral hazard in lending. Audit costs and contract enforcement are four major challenges that have led banks to opt out of lending to small and medium-sized enterprises that find it difficult to provide guarantees and mortgages, leading to a failure in the credit market. UNPROFOR loans played an important role in the failure of the credit market. In the short decades since its inception, UNPROFOR loans have attracted wide attention from all walks of life because of their remarkable performance in alleviating poverty, and the success of Grameen Bank of Bangladesh has attracted the attention of governments. More than 50 developing and developed countries, including the United States, are trying to transplant the new credit model to their own countries. It was inspired by Professor Yunus's UNPROFOR loan model, and at the same time, combined with the actual situation of our country, In 2007, China Construction Bank and Alibaba jointly launched an unsecured, unsecured loan model for small and medium-sized enterprises, the network UNPROFOR loan. Can this new type of loan model, which is independent and innovative, be as successful as the UNPROFOR loan? If successful, how to improve the efficiency of resource allocation in capital market is the main purpose of this paper. The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether the network UNPROFOR loan can be widely carried out and the moral hazard which affects the reason of capital allocation, and whether the network UNPROFOR loan can effectively avoid the moral hazard from the point of view of long-term general equilibrium. In order to alleviate the failure of the credit market, and how it is to play a role is discussed. Therefore, from the perspective of long-term evolution, two moral hazard models are established for the enterprises in UNPROFOR, and the investment and production activities and horizontal supervision behavior of enterprises after obtaining loans are analyzed. The results show that the models are in the long-term general equilibrium. Investment in production activities is consistent with the conclusion of short-term UNPROFOR loans, which can effectively avoid the "hitchhiking" behavior of enterprises. It is wrong to claim in the existing theories that the "hitchhiking" behavior of UNPROFOR loans is prevalent. However, in the study of horizontal supervision, it is found that the conclusions are inconsistent with UNPROFOR loans and are in general equilibrium in the long run. There are serious moral hazard problems in the horizontal supervision of network UNPROFOR loan, and the "hitchhiking" behavior is prevalent. Furthermore, the influence of various factors on the game result is analyzed from a long-term perspective. Then, from the perspective of long-term evolution, a game model is established on whether or not the UNPROFOR and the banks are willing to take the network model to make loans. The analysis shows that the network information disclosure mechanism in the network protection loan makes UNPROFOR tend not to cooperate with the bank, that is, in the long run, it is unwilling to take the network protection to make the loan. This conclusion provides a theoretical basis for the situation that network UNPROFOR loan does not win popularity in reality. Due to the paucity of relevant research in China, the results of this paper will be useful for the future development of network UNPROFOR loan and its follow-up research.
【學位授予單位】:湖南大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:F830.5;F224.32
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 聶爾德;;基于演化博弈視角的中小企業(yè)融資分析[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2011年06期
2 汪旭暉;;次貸危機影響下的中國農(nóng)村信貸體制優(yōu)化[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2009年03期
3 李俊江;郭晴麗;;金融制度創(chuàng)新:小額信貸與公平分配的機理分析[J];財政研究;2008年01期
4 楊偉坤;王立杰;;河北省農(nóng)戶小額信貸需求實證研究——基于河北省農(nóng)村地區(qū)的調(diào)查分析[J];財政研究;2009年12期
5 張麗亞;;網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保貸款的運行機理與法理學分析[J];法制與社會;2011年03期
6 熊學發(fā);吳茂森;;中小企業(yè)網(wǎng)絡聯(lián)保信貸操作模式探索[J];中國管理信息化;2010年14期
7 唐柳潔;;農(nóng)村微型金融團體貸款動力機制研究——從不完全契約理論視角[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟探討;2010年11期
8 李志峗;銀行結(jié)構(gòu)與中小企業(yè)融資[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2002年06期
9 章元,李全;論產(chǎn)出分布對團體貸款還款率的影響[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2003年02期
10 章元;論團體貸款對信貸市場低效率的可能改進[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2005年01期
本文編號:1651746
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/huobilw/1651746.html