【摘要】：云計算的快速發(fā)展為新興服務(wù)業(yè)帶來了全新的機遇和挑戰(zhàn),由云服務(wù)集成提供商、云服務(wù)顧客以及云服務(wù)功能提供商組成的云服務(wù)供應(yīng)鏈需要更多的理論支撐,以提高整體的運作效率。考慮到云服務(wù)中斷事件的偶發(fā)性和破壞性,云服務(wù)集成提供商一方面可以通過有效的契約設(shè)計實現(xiàn)其期望收益的最大化,另一方面也可以通過投保云保險,將云服務(wù)中斷風(fēng)險轉(zhuǎn)移給云保險機構(gòu)。 本文在對云計算服務(wù)相關(guān)實踐現(xiàn)狀進行剖析的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合對云計算風(fēng)險控制和損失補償、供應(yīng)鏈協(xié)調(diào)契約、營業(yè)中斷保險和網(wǎng)絡(luò)保險等方面相關(guān)研究的梳理總結(jié),提煉出本文的主要研究內(nèi)容,在建立契約模型的基礎(chǔ)上,通過比較靜態(tài)分析和數(shù)值仿真分析兩種方法,對引入云保險機制前、云服務(wù)集成提供商為其自身投保云保險和云服務(wù)集成提供商為云服務(wù)顧客投保云保險三種情境下的策略選擇問題進行了探討。 本文研究發(fā)現(xiàn),首先,在一定的參數(shù)關(guān)系下,三種問題情境下的契約模型都存在均衡解,即云服務(wù)集成提供商和云服務(wù)顧客均可參考本模型的結(jié)果采取最優(yōu)策略；其次,損失補償比例作為一個關(guān)鍵的參變量,在不同的云服務(wù)中斷風(fēng)險下,對云服務(wù)集成提供商、云服務(wù)顧客的最優(yōu)決策和期望收益或期望效用產(chǎn)生不同的影響；再次,相比于引入云保險機制前,云服務(wù)集成提供商為其自身投保云保險會使其成為唯一的受益方,其期望收益的增加量與損失補償比例、云服務(wù)顧客的安全效用感知系數(shù)有關(guān)；除此之外,在一定的云服務(wù)中斷風(fēng)險下,云服務(wù)集成提供商為其顧客投保云保險可以使雙方受益,該云保險類型的優(yōu)勢在此時尤為明顯。本文得到的研究結(jié)論,在一定程度上豐富了云服務(wù)供應(yīng)鏈契約理論,并給予云服務(wù)集成提供商許多管理啟示,同時,為云保險市場的興起奠定一定的理論基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of cloud computing brings new opportunities and challenges to the emerging services industry. The cloud service supply chain composed of cloud service integration providers, cloud service customers, and cloud service function providers needs more theoretical support. In order to improve the overall operational efficiency. Given the occasional and disruptive nature of cloud service outages, cloud service integration providers can maximize their expected benefits through effective contract design and, on the other hand, by insuring themselves with cloud insurance. Transfer cloud service disruption risk to cloud insurance institutions. Based on the analysis of the current situation of cloud computing service practice, this paper summarizes the related research on cloud computing risk control and loss compensation, supply chain coordination contract, business interruption insurance and network insurance, etc. The main research contents of this paper are extracted. On the basis of establishing contract model, by comparing two methods of static analysis and numerical simulation analysis, before the introduction of cloud insurance mechanism, Cloud service integration providers insure themselves with cloud insurance and cloud service integration providers insure cloud insurance for cloud service customers. In this paper, we find that, firstly, under certain parameter relations, there are equilibrium solutions in the three problem situations, that is, both cloud service integration providers and cloud service customers can take the optimal strategy according to the results of the model. Secondly, the loss compensation ratio, as a key parameter, has different effects on the optimal decision-making and expected profit or expected utility of cloud service integration providers and cloud service customers under different cloud service interruption risks. Again, compared to the cloud insurance mechanism before the introduction of the cloud insurance mechanism, cloud service integration providers will become the only beneficiary of cloud insurance for themselves, with the increase in expected revenue and the ratio of compensation for loss, The security utility perception coefficient of cloud service customers is related; In addition, with certain cloud service disruption risks, cloud service integration providers can benefit both parties by insuring their customers with cloud insurance, and the benefits of this type of cloud insurance are particularly evident at this time. The conclusion of this paper enriches the contract theory of cloud service supply chain to a certain extent, and gives a lot of management enlightenment to cloud service integration providers. At the same time, it lays a certain theoretical foundation for the rise of cloud insurance market.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南開大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F274;TP309

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊德禮;郭瓊;何勇;徐經(jīng)意;;供應(yīng)鏈契約研究進展[J];管理學(xué)報;2006年01期

2 林家寶;魯耀斌;張龍;;移動服務(wù)供應(yīng)鏈的收益分配機制研究[J];管理學(xué)報;2009年07期

3 楊寶華;;營業(yè)中斷險:業(yè)務(wù)持續(xù)管理與保險產(chǎn)品創(chuàng)新的契合[J];華東經(jīng)濟管理;2011年02期

4 俞海宏;劉南;;數(shù)量柔性契約下引入激勵的服務(wù)供應(yīng)鏈協(xié)調(diào)性研究[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(理學(xué)版);2012年03期

5 張昌利;閆茂德;;引入擔(dān)保的云計算框架及擔(dān)保方風(fēng)險分析[J];計算機工程與應(yīng)用;2010年36期

6 姚樹俊;陳菊紅;張曉瑞;;產(chǎn)品服務(wù)化供應(yīng)鏈能力協(xié)調(diào)對策研究——以價格敏感性隨機需求為視角[J];科技管理研究;2011年23期

7 魯其輝;;基于成本共擔(dān)策略的服務(wù)供應(yīng)鏈協(xié)調(diào)研究[J];控制與決策;2011年11期

8 尤建新;勞水琴;;涉及第三方物流服務(wù)質(zhì)量的供應(yīng)鏈協(xié)調(diào)[J];同濟大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2012年09期

9 徐常梅;;論利潤損失保險的發(fā)展[J];上海保險;2008年09期

10 唐國鋒;但斌;宋寒;;不對稱信息下應(yīng)用服務(wù)外包招標(biāo)機制設(shè)計[J];系統(tǒng)管理學(xué)報;2011年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉桂東;三級供應(yīng)鏈協(xié)調(diào)契約研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

2 唐國鋒;不對稱信息下應(yīng)用服務(wù)外包合同與應(yīng)用服務(wù)供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險分擔(dān)合同[D];重慶大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2454522