基于戰(zhàn)略顧客行為的不同權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)下供應(yīng)鏈績(jī)效研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-01-22 18:22
【摘要】:隨著零售商在規(guī)模、信息獲取和貼近消費(fèi)市場(chǎng)的優(yōu)勢(shì)地位不斷凸顯,加之信息技術(shù)的高速發(fā)展及市場(chǎng)環(huán)境的日益變化推動(dòng)了供應(yīng)鏈相關(guān)經(jīng)濟(jì)力量的巨大變革,導(dǎo)致市場(chǎng)的抗衡勢(shì)力優(yōu)勢(shì)從制造商轉(zhuǎn)向了零售商。市場(chǎng)勢(shì)力向下游轉(zhuǎn)移主要體現(xiàn)在出現(xiàn)了制造商主導(dǎo)、權(quán)力對(duì)等及零售商主導(dǎo)的三種不同權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)供應(yīng)鏈。而零售業(yè)頻繁打折促銷活動(dòng)把顧客訓(xùn)練的日趨理性及戰(zhàn)略性,增大了直接面對(duì)消費(fèi)者的零售商的抗衡勢(shì)力,加劇了零售商與制造商的利益沖突與渠道爭(zhēng)奪,使得供應(yīng)鏈成員企業(yè)和整體均較難達(dá)到帕累托均衡,亟須提出新的應(yīng)對(duì)決策以最大化成員企業(yè)的效益。 本文的研究考慮存在戰(zhàn)略顧客跨期購(gòu)買行為的條件下,基于渠道優(yōu)勢(shì)地位由制造商向零售商轉(zhuǎn)移的動(dòng)態(tài)過(guò)程,通過(guò)比較制造商主導(dǎo)、權(quán)力對(duì)等、零售商主導(dǎo)的博弈均衡以分析戰(zhàn)略顧客的延遲購(gòu)買行為對(duì)供應(yīng)鏈成員企業(yè)最優(yōu)決策以及供應(yīng)鏈績(jī)效的影響。本論文研究結(jié)論表明:供應(yīng)鏈成員企業(yè)若正視戰(zhàn)略顧客存在,制定合理的決策,能達(dá)到互利共贏的局面。不同權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)供應(yīng)鏈績(jī)效的優(yōu)劣情況取決于顧客戰(zhàn)略行為程度的大小,當(dāng)顧客戰(zhàn)略行為程度小于臨界值時(shí),零售商主導(dǎo)下供應(yīng)鏈占優(yōu),反之,制造商主導(dǎo)下供應(yīng)鏈占優(yōu),且高比例的戰(zhàn)略顧客會(huì)持續(xù)惡化零售商主導(dǎo)的供應(yīng)鏈績(jī)效。顧客會(huì)傾向于零售商主導(dǎo)的市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu),因?yàn)樵摍?quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)的銷售價(jià)格最低,消費(fèi)者更能享受到低價(jià)帶來(lái)的好處。本論文所得結(jié)論為存在戰(zhàn)略顧客的行業(yè)提供理論基礎(chǔ)與方法指導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:With the retailers in the scale, access to information and close to the consumer market advantage status constantly prominent, coupled with the rapid development of information technology and the changing market environment, the supply chain related economic forces have been greatly changed. As a result, the market's competitive advantage shifted from manufacturers to retailers. The transfer of market power to downstream is mainly reflected in the emergence of three different power structure supply chains: manufacturer-led, power-equal and retailer-led. And the frequent discount promotion activities in retail industry make the training of customers more rational and strategic, increase the counterweight of retailers facing consumers directly, and aggravate the conflicts of interests between retailers and manufacturers and the competition for channels. It is difficult to achieve Pareto equilibrium for supply chain member enterprises and the whole, so it is urgent to put forward new countermeasures to maximize the benefits of member enterprises. In this paper, considering the existence of strategic customers' intertemporal purchasing behavior, based on the dynamic process of channel dominance transferring from manufacturer to retailer, the author compares manufacturers' dominance and power equivalence. The game equilibrium led by retailers is used to analyze the influence of strategic customers' delayed purchase behavior on the optimal decision and supply chain performance of supply chain member enterprises. The conclusion of this paper shows that if supply chain member enterprises face up to the existence of strategic customers and make reasonable decisions, they can achieve the situation of mutual benefit and win-win situation. The performance of supply chain with different power structure depends on the degree of customer strategic behavior. When the level of customer strategic behavior is less than the critical value, the retailer dominates the supply chain, whereas the manufacturer dominates the supply chain. And a high proportion of strategic customers will continue to deteriorate the retailer-led supply chain performance. Customers tend to prefer a retailer-dominated market structure because the power structure has the lowest sales price and consumers are more likely to enjoy the benefits of low prices. The conclusions of this paper provide theoretical basis and method guidance for industries with strategic customers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F274
[Abstract]:With the retailers in the scale, access to information and close to the consumer market advantage status constantly prominent, coupled with the rapid development of information technology and the changing market environment, the supply chain related economic forces have been greatly changed. As a result, the market's competitive advantage shifted from manufacturers to retailers. The transfer of market power to downstream is mainly reflected in the emergence of three different power structure supply chains: manufacturer-led, power-equal and retailer-led. And the frequent discount promotion activities in retail industry make the training of customers more rational and strategic, increase the counterweight of retailers facing consumers directly, and aggravate the conflicts of interests between retailers and manufacturers and the competition for channels. It is difficult to achieve Pareto equilibrium for supply chain member enterprises and the whole, so it is urgent to put forward new countermeasures to maximize the benefits of member enterprises. In this paper, considering the existence of strategic customers' intertemporal purchasing behavior, based on the dynamic process of channel dominance transferring from manufacturer to retailer, the author compares manufacturers' dominance and power equivalence. The game equilibrium led by retailers is used to analyze the influence of strategic customers' delayed purchase behavior on the optimal decision and supply chain performance of supply chain member enterprises. The conclusion of this paper shows that if supply chain member enterprises face up to the existence of strategic customers and make reasonable decisions, they can achieve the situation of mutual benefit and win-win situation. The performance of supply chain with different power structure depends on the degree of customer strategic behavior. When the level of customer strategic behavior is less than the critical value, the retailer dominates the supply chain, whereas the manufacturer dominates the supply chain. And a high proportion of strategic customers will continue to deteriorate the retailer-led supply chain performance. Customers tend to prefer a retailer-dominated market structure because the power structure has the lowest sales price and consumers are more likely to enjoy the benefits of low prices. The conclusions of this paper provide theoretical basis and method guidance for industries with strategic customers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F274
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張貴磊;劉志學(xué);;主導(dǎo)型供應(yīng)鏈的Stackelberg利潤(rùn)分配博弈[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2006年11期
2 王強(qiáng),王U,
本文編號(hào):2413447
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/gongyinglianguanli/2413447.html
最近更新
教材專著