本文選題：稅務(wù)績(jī)效 + 考核評(píng)價(jià)��； 參考：《云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開(kāi)放30多年以來(lái),我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)取得迅猛發(fā)展的良好成效,稅收作為經(jīng)濟(jì)的晴雨表也顯現(xiàn)出不凡的表現(xiàn),隨著近年國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)逐漸步入新常態(tài)的發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì),局部地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增速放緩,甚至出現(xiàn)下行趨勢(shì),稅收收入規(guī)模下降,進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致因財(cái)政收支壓力加大、各界對(duì)稅收認(rèn)知程度不一和缺乏立體全息式的考核評(píng)價(jià)機(jī)制等因素,使得本應(yīng)作用于區(qū)域宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)和發(fā)揮財(cái)政職能的基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)倍感壓力重重,主要表現(xiàn)在對(duì)基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)的考核評(píng)價(jià)缺乏橫、縱向比對(duì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),簡(jiǎn)單方式下的考核評(píng)價(jià)所得出的結(jié)果應(yīng)用致使組織缺乏長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)的目標(biāo)規(guī)劃,追求短期效益而導(dǎo)致沉沒(méi)成本增加,社會(huì)資源嚴(yán)重浪費(fèi),稅法執(zhí)行剛性不同程度受損,社會(huì)滿意度不高,這些現(xiàn)象勢(shì)必會(huì)成為制約公共稅務(wù)良性發(fā)展和國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)良好運(yùn)行的重要因素,在稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部績(jī)效管理漸趨完善的情況下,針對(duì)基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)建立起科學(xué)有效的考核評(píng)價(jià)體系顯得尤為緊迫和必要。本文以F縣國(guó)家稅務(wù)局為例,通過(guò)大量走訪調(diào)查,深入研究該局近三年來(lái)社會(huì)綜合評(píng)議評(píng)價(jià)情況,包括考核評(píng)價(jià)主體的組成、方式的采用和結(jié)果的應(yīng)用等方面,分析在當(dāng)前考核評(píng)價(jià)做法作用下對(duì)該局實(shí)際工作所產(chǎn)生的影響,針對(duì)主體廣泛性缺失、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)缺乏客觀性和專業(yè)性、考評(píng)信息不對(duì)稱、基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)面臨話語(yǔ)困境等問(wèn)題,提出對(duì)基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)當(dāng)建立起專業(yè)、相適、科學(xué)的考核評(píng)價(jià)體系,運(yùn)用公共管理部門共屬考評(píng)指標(biāo)和專屬考評(píng)指標(biāo)相結(jié)合的指標(biāo)體系,充分發(fā)揮考核評(píng)價(jià)的約束和導(dǎo)向功能,促使基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)各項(xiàng)工作健康良性可持續(xù)發(fā)展,進(jìn)而為稅收職能作用的體現(xiàn)提供基礎(chǔ)保障。本文旨在闡明,建立和完善基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)工作考核評(píng)價(jià)體系,事關(guān)法制支持、稅法遵從和信息對(duì)稱等外在環(huán)境支撐,需要構(gòu)筑共性與個(gè)性的考核評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,確定科學(xué)合理的指標(biāo)權(quán)重,引入獨(dú)立、專業(yè)的第三方評(píng)價(jià)機(jī)構(gòu),制定并執(zhí)行考核評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果應(yīng)用保障制度,才可以作為評(píng)判基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)稅務(wù)管理水平和運(yùn)行效率的重要依據(jù)。只有通過(guò)科學(xué)的考核評(píng)價(jià)才能促進(jìn)基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)職能得以規(guī)范體現(xiàn),才能為公民提供更加優(yōu)質(zhì)的公共稅務(wù)產(chǎn)品和涉稅服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up for more than 30 years, China's economy and society have achieved good results of rapid development. Tax, as a barometer of the economy, has also shown remarkable performance. With the development of the national economy and society gradually entering the new normal in recent years, In some areas, the economic growth rate has slowed down, even a downward trend has appeared, and the scale of tax revenue has declined. As a result of the increased pressure on fiscal revenue and expenditure, various circles have different degrees of understanding of taxation and lack of a three-dimensional holographic examination and evaluation mechanism, and so on. That makes the grass-roots tax authorities, which should be acting on the regional macroeconomic and exerting the financial functions, feel a great deal of pressure, mainly because of the lack of horizontal and vertical comparison standards for the assessment and evaluation of the grass-roots tax authorities. The application of the results obtained from the assessment and evaluation under the simple mode leads to the lack of long-term objective planning of the organization, the pursuit of short-term benefits and the increase of sunk costs, the serious waste of social resources, and the damage to different degrees of the rigidity of the implementation of the tax law. Social satisfaction is not high, these phenomena are bound to become an important factor that restricts the benign development of public taxation and the good operation of the national economy. Under the circumstances of the gradual improvement of the internal performance management of tax authorities, It is particularly urgent and necessary to establish a scientific and effective assessment system for the basic tax authorities. Taking the State Taxation Bureau of F County as an example, through a large number of visits and investigations, this paper makes a thorough study of the situation of comprehensive social evaluation and evaluation of the Bureau in the past three years, including the composition of the main body of assessment, the adoption of methods and the application of results, etc. This paper analyzes the influence on the actual work of the Bureau under the action of the current assessment and evaluation practice, aiming at the lack of universality of the main body, the lack of objectivity and professionalism of the standard, the asymmetry of the evaluation information, the dilemma of the discourse of the grass-roots tax authorities, and so on. It is proposed that a professional, appropriate and scientific assessment system should be established for the tax authorities at the grass-roots level, and that the public administration departments should make full use of the index system which is the combination of the evaluation index and the exclusive evaluation index, and give full play to the restriction and guidance function of the assessment and evaluation. To promote the healthy and sustainable development of the work of the grassroots tax authorities, and then to provide the basic protection for the function of tax revenue. The purpose of this paper is to clarify that the establishment and improvement of the evaluation system for the work of the tax authorities at the grass-roots level is related to the support of the legal system, compliance of the tax law and symmetry of information, and so on, so it is necessary to construct a common and unique evaluation index system. The scientific and reasonable index weight, the introduction of independent and professional third-party evaluation institutions, and the establishment and implementation of the evaluation results application security system can be regarded as an important basis for judging the tax administration level and operational efficiency of the grass-roots tax authorities. Only through scientific assessment and evaluation can the functions of the grass-roots tax authorities be standardized and the citizens be provided with more high-quality public tax products and tax-related services.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F812.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 毛新志;;我國(guó)公眾參與轉(zhuǎn)基因食品社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)存在的問(wèn)題及其出路[J];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年06期

2 張景華;彭驥鳴;;稅收風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理關(guān)鍵績(jī)效指標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建及應(yīng)用[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論研究;2013年04期

3 付立紅;;制約稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)績(jī)效管理有效性的因素探析[J];辦公室業(yè)務(wù);2013年11期

4 李長(zhǎng)鴻;;稅收收入計(jì)劃分類管理的實(shí)踐與思考[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年S1期

5 劉文怡;劉永紅;;依法行政與法治政府建設(shè)問(wèn)題探討[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(漢文哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

6 彭驥鳴;張景華;;納稅人滿意度評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建[J];稅務(wù)研究;2011年07期

7 崔立立;;關(guān)于我國(guó)稅收收入持續(xù)高增長(zhǎng)與GDP關(guān)系論爭(zhēng)的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];新鄉(xiāng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

8 吳向京;;第三方評(píng)價(jià)在績(jī)效管理中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)電力企業(yè)管理;2010年Z1期

9 齊寧;周實(shí);;政府績(jī)效評(píng)估法制化研究[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)輯刊;2009年05期

10 鄭方輝;畢紫薇;;第三方績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)與服務(wù)型政府建設(shè)[J];華南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 徐明;稅收風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

2 陳文娟;稅收風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理視角下的稅源管理研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

3 譚瑋;廣州市基層稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)實(shí)證研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2013年

4 車盛軍;稅收風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理的探索與實(shí)踐[D];蘇州大學(xué);2012年

5 賈志普;基于經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)相關(guān)性分析的中國(guó)稅收風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

6 王珊;依法行政考核指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2012年

7 李莎;財(cái)政分權(quán)下地方政府行為的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

8 彭華林;鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)政府績(jī)效外部評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年

9 梁愛(ài)英;政府績(jī)效管理過(guò)程中內(nèi)部評(píng)估和外部評(píng)價(jià)的結(jié)合機(jī)制初探[D];浙江大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1913442