本文選題：公務(wù)員 + 財(cái)產(chǎn)公開��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：腐敗現(xiàn)象在我國日趨嚴(yán)重的發(fā)展趨勢,使我國不得不尋找更有力的措施來遏制這一腐敗現(xiàn)象的蔓延。財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度在國外運(yùn)行多年,獲得了陽光法案的美譽(yù),被公認(rèn)為是反腐利器。我國在20多年前就已經(jīng)實(shí)施了財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度,但財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度在我國并沒有發(fā)揮出國外對其評價的應(yīng)有作用。財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)是財(cái)產(chǎn)公開的基礎(chǔ),本文正是在這樣的背景下,針對財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度在我國發(fā)揮的似有似無的作用,試圖找出真正適合我國財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度的路徑。 本文分五大部分。第一部分是緒論,主要是對國內(nèi)外財(cái)產(chǎn)公開研究現(xiàn)狀的介紹,以及本文的研究特色所在。本文的研究特色主要體現(xiàn)在,對國內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)公開理論空缺的研究,以及提出了較具操作性的實(shí)施財(cái)產(chǎn)公開的對策建議兩個方面。第二部分是我國財(cái)產(chǎn)公開的一些基本問題的介紹。首先是對財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)和財(cái)產(chǎn)公開區(qū)別的梳理,該問題是源于我國的財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度在多數(shù)情況下都在回避財(cái)產(chǎn)公開,使本應(yīng)密不可分的關(guān)系變成了各自間的獨(dú)立；其次是對財(cái)產(chǎn)公開理論依據(jù)的探討,主要從公共管理倫理學(xué)理論和公共權(quán)力理論兩個方面論述；最后是對財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度必要性的介紹,包括其反腐功效、反腐國際義務(wù)和我國民主制度的完善等方面。第三部分是對我國財(cái)產(chǎn)公開的現(xiàn)狀以及推行困難原因的分析。財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)是財(cái)產(chǎn)公開的基礎(chǔ),我國最早的財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)源于三國時期,當(dāng)代中國的財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)從1988年開始,至今,財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)備受全國人民關(guān)注,盡管每年斷斷續(xù)續(xù)都有財(cái)產(chǎn)公開試點(diǎn)的出現(xiàn),但現(xiàn)在我國的財(cái)產(chǎn)公開還未在全國范圍內(nèi)正式普及。面對財(cái)產(chǎn)公開的如此現(xiàn)狀,本人試圖從現(xiàn)存制度層面和文化思想層面對我國財(cái)產(chǎn)公開的阻力因素進(jìn)行探討。第四部分是對國內(nèi)外實(shí)施財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度的國家和地區(qū)的介紹,選擇了為財(cái)產(chǎn)公開最先立法的英國,財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度立法最完備的典范國家美國,曾經(jīng)與我國國情相似且近年才實(shí)施財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度的俄羅斯,以及港澳臺地區(qū)的財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度。第五部分是對我國公務(wù)員財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度對策的建議。結(jié)合我國財(cái)產(chǎn)公開受阻原因和國外財(cái)產(chǎn)公開的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn),從財(cái)產(chǎn)公開推行的基礎(chǔ)、法制化的趨勢、突破點(diǎn)的選擇以及針對財(cái)產(chǎn)公開的監(jiān)督機(jī)制和配套設(shè)施的完善等方面提出了針對性的對策。 研究我國公務(wù)員財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度,是順應(yīng)時代和民意要求的必然選擇,也是在全球反腐背景下探討適合我國的反腐策略。通過借鑒國內(nèi)外的先進(jìn)反腐理念和成果,利于推動我國的廉政建設(shè),同時,也有利于我國民主制度的完善。
[Abstract]:Because of the increasingly serious development trend of corruption in China, our country has to look for more powerful measures to curb the spread of corruption. Property disclosure system has been operating in foreign countries for many years, has won the reputation of Sunshine Act, is recognized as an anti-corruption weapon. The property declaration system has been implemented in China for more than 20 years, but the property declaration system has not played a role in evaluating it abroad. Property declaration is the basis of property disclosure. Under this background, this paper tries to find out the path that is really suitable for property disclosure system in view of the seemingly insignificant function of property declaration system in our country. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction, mainly introduces the domestic and foreign property open research present situation, as well as the research characteristic of this article. The main research features of this paper are as follows: the research on the theory of property disclosure in China and the countermeasures and suggestions for the implementation of property disclosure. The second part is the introduction of some basic problems of property disclosure in China. The first is to sort out the distinction between property declaration and property disclosure, which stems from the fact that the property declaration system in our country is evading property disclosure in most cases, which makes the relationship between them become independent. Secondly, it discusses the theoretical basis of property disclosure, mainly from the two aspects of public management ethics theory and public power theory, and finally introduces the necessity of property disclosure system, including its anti-corruption effect. The international obligation of anti-corruption and the perfection of our democratic system. The third part is the analysis of the present situation and the difficult reasons of the property disclosure in our country. Property declaration is the basis of property disclosure. The earliest property declaration in China originated from the period of the three Kingdoms. The property declaration of contemporary China began in 1988 and has been concerned by the people throughout the country. Although every year there are intermittent property disclosure pilot, but now the property disclosure in China has not been officially popularized in the country. In the face of the present situation of property disclosure, I try to discuss the resistance factors of property disclosure in our country from the existing institutional level and cultural and ideological level. The fourth part is an introduction to the countries and regions that implement the property disclosure system at home and abroad. The United States has chosen the United Kingdom, which first legislates for the property disclosure system, and the United States, which has the most complete legislation on the property disclosure system. The property disclosure system in Russia and Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan is similar to that in our country and has only been implemented in recent years. The fifth part is to our country civil servant property open system countermeasure suggestion. Combined with the reasons for the obstruction of property disclosure in our country and the experience and lessons of foreign property disclosure, from the basis of the implementation of property publicity, the trend of legalization, The choice of breakthrough points and the improvement of supervision mechanism and supporting facilities of property disclosure are put forward. To study the property disclosure system of civil servants in China is an inevitable choice to meet the needs of the times and public opinion, and it is also a suitable anti-corruption strategy for our country under the background of global anti-corruption. By drawing lessons from the advanced anti-corruption ideas and achievements at home and abroad, it is beneficial to promote the construction of clean government in our country, and at the same time, to perfect the democratic system of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D630.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 全建業(yè);;穩(wěn)步推進(jìn)官員財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度建設(shè)[J];重慶社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

2 李志明;;試析制定官員財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)公示制度的癥結(jié)與對策[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年05期

3 周國忠;;我國官員財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度回避公示的文化解讀[J];黨政干部論壇;2010年03期

4 龐大鵬;金哲;;俄羅斯的“反腐敗國家計(jì)劃”[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2009年03期

5 王明高,胡祥勇;中國家庭財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制的建立與健全[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2004年01期

6 李小紅;;中國公務(wù)員財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度的現(xiàn)狀及建構(gòu)障礙[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

7 李小紅;;論中國公務(wù)員財(cái)產(chǎn)公開制度的基本內(nèi)容[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

8 張忠利;劉春蘭;;臺灣公務(wù)員財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)與公開制度及其成效[J];西北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2012年02期

9 袁峰;;公職人員財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)信息公示機(jī)制探析[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

10 王英;;美國公務(wù)員的財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度[J];刊授黨校;2010年04期

，

本文編號：1814427