發(fā)布時間：2018-09-14 15:37

【摘要】：在我國信息公開實踐中,出現(xiàn)了申請人大量申請、反復申請政府信息公開的情形。司法實踐將此類申請行為界定為"濫用政府信息申請權(quán)"或"濫用知情權(quán)",并認為此類行為構(gòu)成權(quán)利濫用。由于公法上權(quán)利關(guān)系的特殊性和知情權(quán)的復合性功能,在將發(fā)源于私法領(lǐng)域的禁止權(quán)利濫用原則適用于公法上的知情權(quán)問題時,必須對該原則的適用進行嚴格的范圍界定和規(guī)則限制,通過對知情權(quán)行使的原則設定、濫用權(quán)利行為的類型化以及建構(gòu)濫用權(quán)利的測試標準等途徑,抑制行政機構(gòu)和司法機關(guān)適用權(quán)利濫用原則的自由裁量空間,從而實現(xiàn)對知情權(quán)的權(quán)利保障和抑制權(quán)利濫用之間的平衡。
[Abstract]:In the practice of information disclosure in our country, a large number of applicants apply for government information disclosure repeatedly. Judicial practice defines this kind of application as "abusing the right to apply for government information" or "abusing the right to know", and thinks that this kind of behavior constitutes abuse of rights. Because of the particularity of the right relation in public law and the compound function of the right to know, when the principle of prohibiting abuse of right originated in the field of private law is applied to the problem of the right to know in public law, The application of this principle must be strictly defined and restricted, through the setting of the principle of the exercise of the right to know, the typology of the abuse of the right to know, and the construction of the test standard for the abuse of the right, etc. In order to balance the protection of the right to know and the abusing of the right, the discretionary space of applying the principle of abuse of rights to the administrative organs and the judicial organs is restrained, so as to achieve the balance between the right to know and the right to abuse.
【作者單位】： 北京大學法學院;
【分類號】：D922.1
，

本文編號：2243130