本文選題：超大城市 + 突發(fā)環(huán)境事件　； 參考：《中國(guó)人口·資源與環(huán)境》2017年12期

【摘要】：自然和人為因素的雙重?cái)_動(dòng)使超大城市面臨著難以規(guī)避的環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn),碎片化的突發(fā)環(huán)境事件治理模式已經(jīng)不能有效應(yīng)對(duì)超大城市環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn)來(lái)源多樣化、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素復(fù)雜化和破壞程度規(guī)�；瘞�(lái)的挑戰(zhàn)。整體性治理在揚(yáng)棄韋伯式官僚制和新公共管理理論的過(guò)程中,主張重塑政府在公共管理中的價(jià)值和責(zé)任,通過(guò)對(duì)治理層級(jí)、功能、公共部門和私人部門的關(guān)系以及信息系統(tǒng)的碎片化進(jìn)行整合,以跨界、協(xié)調(diào)與合作的方式為公民提供無(wú)縫隙且非分離的整體性服務(wù)高度契合了超大城市危機(jī)治理對(duì)政府管理公共性、責(zé)任性,協(xié)同和整合的需要,是對(duì)碎片化危機(jī)治理體制的一個(gè)有力回應(yīng)。文章梳理了突發(fā)事件治理和整體性治理的國(guó)內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn),試圖通過(guò)整體性治理理論和"天津港8·12瑞海公司危險(xiǎn)品倉(cāng)庫(kù)特別重大火災(zāi)爆炸事故",解剖中國(guó)超大城市突發(fā)環(huán)境事件治理的各種碎片化問(wèn)題。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),現(xiàn)行超大城市突發(fā)環(huán)境事件治理的碎片化主要表現(xiàn)為:在治理理念上,預(yù)防意識(shí)不強(qiáng),公共利益和公共責(zé)任觀念淡薄;在治理主體上,市場(chǎng)和社會(huì)主體參與不足,政府一元化治理色彩突出;在治理信息上,信息危機(jī)放大危機(jī)事件的社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn);在治理機(jī)制上,政府部門職責(zé)不清,協(xié)調(diào)溝通不暢。從整體性治理理論和超大城市突發(fā)環(huán)境事件治理的碎片化的現(xiàn)實(shí)出發(fā),文章提出超大城市突發(fā)環(huán)境事件治理必須進(jìn)行整體性改革和創(chuàng)新,從培育危機(jī)文化,強(qiáng)化危機(jī)預(yù)防和政府公共責(zé)任意識(shí);完善社會(huì)資本,加強(qiáng)社會(huì)參與;建立統(tǒng)一的治理信息中心及推進(jìn)組織結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整與改革等方面構(gòu)建突發(fā)環(huán)境事件整體性治理模式。
[Abstract]:Due to the dual disturbance of natural and human factors, megacities are faced with environmental risks that are difficult to avoid. The fragmented management mode of environmental emergencies can no longer effectively cope with the diversification of environmental risk sources in megacities. The complexity of risk factors and the scale of damage caused by the challenges. In the process of sublation of Weber bureaucracy and new public management theory, holistic governance advocates remolding the value and responsibility of government in public management, through the management hierarchy and function. The relationship between the public and private sectors and the fragmentation of information systems for cross-border integration, The way of coordination and cooperation provides citizens with seamless and non-separate holistic services, which are highly suited to the needs of government management publicity, responsibility, coordination and integration in the governance of mega-cities. It is a powerful response to the fragmented crisis management system. The article combs the domestic and foreign literature on emergency management and holistic governance. Through the theory of holistic governance and "Tianjin Port 812 Ruihai dangerous goods warehouse fire explosion accident", this paper attempts to dissect the various fragmentation problems in the management of unexpected environmental events in Chinese megacities. It is found that the fragmentation of the current management of environmental emergencies in megacities is mainly manifested in the following aspects: the concept of prevention is not strong, the concept of public interest and public responsibility is weak, and the participation of market and social subjects in governance is insufficient. On governance information, information crisis magnifies the social risk of crisis events, and in governance mechanism, the responsibilities of government departments are not clear, and coordination and communication are not smooth. Based on the theory of holistic governance and the fragmented reality of the governance of environmental emergencies in megacities, this paper puts forward that the governance of environmental emergencies in megacities must be reformed and innovated as a whole, and the crisis culture should be cultivated. Strengthening the consciousness of crisis prevention and government public responsibility, perfecting social capital, strengthening social participation, establishing unified governance information center and promoting the adjustment and reform of organizational structure, etc.
【作者單位】： 江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)財(cái)稅與公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“推進(jìn)我國(guó)突發(fā)環(huán)境事件協(xié)同治理能力現(xiàn)代化研究”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):15CZZ041),“流域水資源配置與治理中地方政府協(xié)同治理機(jī)制研究”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):13CZZ054);國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目“構(gòu)建基于生態(tài)文明建設(shè)的公共財(cái)政體制研究”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):15ZDB159) 中國(guó)博士后科學(xué)基金面上項(xiàng)目“超大城市突發(fā)環(huán)境事件整體性治理研究”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):2017M612151)
【分類號(hào)】：D63

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 張潤(rùn)昊;;論突發(fā)環(huán)境事件的應(yīng)急預(yù)案[J];襄樊職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

2 王婭;黃懋;李云;朱洪濤;;完善貴陽(yáng)市突發(fā)環(huán)境事件應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制研究[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期

3 ;《國(guó)家突發(fā)環(huán)境事件應(yīng)急預(yù)案》解讀[J];中國(guó)應(yīng)急管理;2007年07期

4 ;南陽(yáng)市人民政府關(guān)于印發(fā)南陽(yáng)市突發(fā)環(huán)境事件應(yīng)急預(yù)案的通知[J];南陽(yáng)市人民政府公報(bào);2008年05期

5 田琪雅;;突發(fā)環(huán)境事件中的政府與企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)制度研究[J];企業(yè)導(dǎo)報(bào);2014年01期

6 王u恌，

本文編號(hào)：2002188