本文選題：費(fèi)用粘性 + 中央企業(yè)�。� 參考：《吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)管理會(huì)計(jì)成本性態(tài)理論中假設(shè)成本與業(yè)務(wù)量之間存在必然的線性關(guān)系，即業(yè)務(wù)量隨成本的增加或減少成比例變化。而學(xué)者們?cè)谘芯窟^(guò)程中發(fā)現(xiàn)，二者并不以完全的直線關(guān)系變化：在業(yè)務(wù)量變化的正反方向上，成本隨業(yè)務(wù)量變化時(shí)，邊際變化率表現(xiàn)出不對(duì)稱性(增長(zhǎng)率高于降低率)。在費(fèi)用行為中容易被觀察得到，因此又稱為費(fèi)用“粘性”（孫錚、劉浩，2004）。提出有效建議來(lái)加強(qiáng)成本費(fèi)用管理，有助中央企業(yè)穩(wěn)定、長(zhǎng)期、有序地發(fā)展，由此從整體上使我國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)水平得到進(jìn)一步的提高。 在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)學(xué)者關(guān)于成本及費(fèi)用粘性研究文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行回顧與梳理的基礎(chǔ)上，分析了制度背景及相關(guān)理論。本文以我國(guó)中央企業(yè)上市公司為樣本，以國(guó)資委實(shí)施《中央企業(yè)負(fù)責(zé)人經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)考核暫行辦法》作時(shí)期界定，，運(yùn)用實(shí)證研究方法驗(yàn)證了在2001-2011年我國(guó)央企上市公司存在粘性，并且考核辦法實(shí)施前后的粘性程度存在差異。研究結(jié)果表明：①我國(guó)中央企業(yè)上市公司存在費(fèi)用的粘性特征，且行業(yè)不同，費(fèi)用的粘性程度有差異；②考核辦法正式實(shí)施后，降低了央企上市公司粘性程度；③拉長(zhǎng)時(shí)間跨度，費(fèi)用粘性在以后的會(huì)計(jì)期間出現(xiàn)反轉(zhuǎn)；④在費(fèi)用粘性的成因方面，宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)具有減弱費(fèi)用粘性的效果，資本密集程度與費(fèi)用粘性程度成正相關(guān)。 根據(jù)以往的研究結(jié)果可以得知，在我國(guó)上市企業(yè)當(dāng)中成本費(fèi)用粘性是普遍存在的。但是通過(guò)完善中央企業(yè)內(nèi)部各方面成本費(fèi)用監(jiān)督與控制的途徑和方式，可以降低費(fèi)用粘性的消極影響，優(yōu)化企業(yè)治理結(jié)構(gòu)、提高成本管理水平，使其盈利水平和能力得到改善。由此實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)資源的有效利用與合理配置，進(jìn)而合理降低總成本。
[Abstract]:In the traditional cost behavior theory of management accounting, it is assumed that there is an inevitable linear relationship between the cost and the volume of business, that is, the volume of business varies proportionately with the increase or decrease of the cost. However, in the process of research, it is found that the two do not change completely in a straight line. In the positive and negative direction of the change of business volume, the marginal rate of change shows asymmetry (the growth rate is higher than the decreasing rate) when the cost changes with the volume of business. It is easy to be observed in the behavior of expenses, so it is also called "stickiness" of expenses. Putting forward effective suggestions to strengthen cost and cost management will help the central enterprises to develop steadily, in the long run and in an orderly manner. Therefore, the economic level of our country has been further improved on the whole. On the basis of reviewing and combing the literatures of domestic and foreign scholars on cost and cost stickiness, the institutional background and relevant theories are analyzed. This paper takes the listed companies of the central enterprises as a sample, defines the period of the implementation of the interim measures for the performance Assessment of the Central Enterprise leaders by the SASAC, and verifies the existence of stickiness in the listed companies of the central enterprises in China from 2001 to 2011 by using the empirical research method. And the evaluation method before and after the implementation of viscosity degree differences. The research results show that there exists the viscous characteristic of the cost in the central enterprise listed company of our country, and the industry is different, and the viscosity degree of the cost is different. 2 after the formal implementation of the examination method, the viscosity degree of the listed company in the central enterprise has been reduced. (3) when the time span is long and the cost viscosity is reversed in the later accounting period, the macroeconomic growth has the effect of weakening the cost stickiness in terms of the causes of the cost stickiness. There is a positive correlation between the degree of capital concentration and the degree of cost stickiness. According to the previous research results, the cost stickiness is common in listed enterprises in China. However, by perfecting the ways and means of supervising and controlling the cost and expenses in all aspects of the central enterprise, we can reduce the negative influence of the cost stickiness, optimize the corporate governance structure, improve the cost management level, and improve its profit level and ability. Thus, the effective utilization and rational allocation of social resources are realized, and then the total cost is reasonably reduced.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F275;F276.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 方巧玲;;成本粘性研究現(xiàn)狀述評(píng)及未來(lái)展望——基于國(guó)內(nèi)外研究成果的文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2011年18期

2 朱乃平;;成本粘性對(duì)管理會(huì)計(jì)成本性態(tài)假設(shè)的挑戰(zhàn)[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2008年07期

3 陳燦平;;企業(yè)費(fèi)用“粘性”行為影響因素研究——基于地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)生態(tài)差異視角[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2008年06期

4 曹曉雪;于長(zhǎng)春;周澤將;;費(fèi)用“粘性”研究:來(lái)自中央企業(yè)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年01期

5 范琦;;中央企業(yè)持股比例對(duì)其控股上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)的影響[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2007年06期

6 劉武;;企業(yè)費(fèi)用“粘性”行為:基于行業(yè)差異的實(shí)證研究[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年12期

7 邊喜春;;費(fèi)用“粘性”的成因及控制對(duì)策[J];價(jià)格月刊;2005年12期

8 萬(wàn)壽義;王紅軍;;管理層自利、董事會(huì)治理與費(fèi)用粘性——來(lái)自中國(guó)制造業(yè)上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2011年03期

9 孫錚,劉浩;中國(guó)上市公司費(fèi)用“粘性”行為研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年12期

10 孔玉生;朱乃平;孔慶根;;成本粘性研究:來(lái)自中國(guó)上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2007年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 潘穎靜;費(fèi)用粘性與公司治理、投資者法律保護(hù)的相關(guān)性研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年

2 韓飛;我國(guó)制造類上市公司成本粘性實(shí)證研究[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2011年

3 王紅軍;代理問(wèn)題、費(fèi)用粘性與公司績(jī)效[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

4 孔慶根;我國(guó)上市公司成本粘性的實(shí)證研究[D];江蘇大學(xué);2007年

5 呂晶晶;成本粘性、盈利預(yù)期與市場(chǎng)反應(yīng)[D];南京大學(xué);2012年

6 文穎;制造型企業(yè)成本費(fèi)用粘性實(shí)證研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2000013