本文選題：地下空間 + 綜合管廊��； 參考：《江蘇大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：綜合管廊是將原本埋設(shè)在城市地下的電力、通信,供熱、燃?xì)�、給水等管線集中安置在一處,進(jìn)行統(tǒng)一的規(guī)劃、敷設(shè)、維護(hù)和管理。建設(shè)綜合管廊是市政管網(wǎng)管理層面的轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí),有效地解決市政管線反復(fù)挖開造成的城市馬路拉鏈問題,有利于市政管線的集約化管理與維護(hù);提升了市政管線的抗災(zāi)害能力,使市政管線的運(yùn)行效率和運(yùn)行安全性更加有保障;提高了城市地下空間的使用率,促進(jìn)市政基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施服務(wù)功能的完善,具有顯著的經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)效益。綜合管廊存在建設(shè)投資大、運(yùn)營周期長以及運(yùn)營管理協(xié)調(diào)難度大等問題,我國綜合管廊的整體水平又處在初期發(fā)展階段,相關(guān)的投融資模式、運(yùn)營管理制度和運(yùn)營收費(fèi)機(jī)制都還尚未建立完善。拓展建設(shè)資金來源渠道,吸引社會(huì)資本參與其中;完善運(yùn)營管理制度,建立運(yùn)營收費(fèi)機(jī)制是目前我國綜合管廊發(fā)展急需研究解決的問題。本文完成的主要研究工作內(nèi)容如下:1、在廣泛查閱相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)資料和前往綜合管廊項(xiàng)目實(shí)地調(diào)研的基礎(chǔ)上,介紹綜合管廊的定義、優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)及其社會(huì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)效益,對(duì)政府全權(quán)出資、政府與管線單位聯(lián)合出資、政府與社會(huì)資本合作三種綜合管廊投融資模式進(jìn)行分析,并探討設(shè)施管理對(duì)降低綜合管廊運(yùn)營成本的應(yīng)用價(jià)值。2、根據(jù)項(xiàng)目全生命周期成本理論,著重分析綜合管廊建設(shè)階段的投資建設(shè)成本構(gòu)成和綜合管廊運(yùn)營期間的能耗成本、維護(hù)成本、管理成本構(gòu)成,并且對(duì)綜合管廊建設(shè)階段產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)、環(huán)境成本以及市政管線入駐綜合管廊后需繳納的使用費(fèi)進(jìn)行分析。3、根據(jù)綜合管廊的屬性對(duì)各相關(guān)主體的利益關(guān)系進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)論述,分析管線單位費(fèi)用支出、投資者回報(bào)要求以及政府補(bǔ)足政策對(duì)綜合管廊收費(fèi)定價(jià)的影響,并研究綜合管廊運(yùn)營收費(fèi)思路與辦法,基于使用者付費(fèi)原則與協(xié)作共贏原則,提出采用商業(yè)性+公益性相結(jié)合的運(yùn)營收費(fèi)模式達(dá)到收回全生命周期成本以及對(duì)第三方投資者進(jìn)行合理回報(bào)。4、本文以�？谑械叵戮C合管廊工程為案例,對(duì)其投資回報(bào)進(jìn)行分析。首先分析該綜合管廊項(xiàng)目建設(shè)階段及運(yùn)營階段的各項(xiàng)費(fèi)用構(gòu)成,然后根據(jù)成本+收益的綜合管廊收費(fèi)模型,計(jì)算得出各市政管線需要繳納的綜合管廊一次性空間租用費(fèi)和運(yùn)營管理費(fèi)。
[Abstract]:The integrated pipe gallery is a centralized arrangement of electric power, communication, heating, gas, water supply and other pipelines buried in the underground of the city to carry out unified planning, laying, maintenance and management. The construction of comprehensive pipe gallery is the transformation and upgrading of municipal pipe network management level, which effectively solves the problem of city road zipper caused by repeated excavation of municipal pipelines, which is beneficial to the intensive management and maintenance of municipal pipelines, and enhances the disaster resistance ability of municipal pipelines. The operation efficiency and safety of municipal pipelines are more guaranteed, the utilization rate of urban underground space is increased, and the service function of municipal infrastructure is improved, which has remarkable economic and social benefits. There are many problems such as large investment in construction, long operation cycle and difficulty in operation management coordination. The overall level of integrated pipe gallery in China is in the initial stage of development, and the related investment and financing mode. Operation management system and operation charge mechanism have not yet been established and perfected. It is urgent to study and solve the problems in the development of comprehensive management gallery in China at present, which is to expand the sources of construction funds and attract social capital to participate in it, and to perfect the operation management system and establish the operating charge mechanism. The main research contents of this paper are as follows: 1. On the basis of extensively consulting relevant documents and going to the field investigation of the integrated management corridor project, this paper introduces the definition, advantages and disadvantages, social and economic benefits of the integrated management corridor, and makes full contributions to the government. This paper analyzes three kinds of investment and financing modes of integrated pipe corridor, which are jointly funded by government and pipeline unit, and discusses the application value of facility management to reduce the operating cost of integrated pipe corridor. According to the theory of project life cycle cost, this paper discusses the application value of facility management in reducing the operation cost of integrated pipe corridor. The composition of investment cost, energy consumption cost, maintenance cost and management cost in the construction stage of integrated pipe gallery are analyzed, and the society in the construction stage of integrated pipe gallery is analyzed. The environmental cost and the usage fee of the municipal pipeline after entering the integrated pipe corridor are analyzed. According to the attributes of the integrated pipe corridor, the interest relationship of the relevant parties is systematically discussed, and the unit cost of the pipeline is analyzed. The effect of investor return requirement and government complement policy on the pricing of integrated gallery charges is studied. Based on the principle of user payment and the principle of win-win cooperation, the author studies the ideas and methods of integrated corridor operation charges. This paper puts forward to adopt the commercial public welfare combined operation charge mode to recover the whole life cycle cost and to carry on the reasonable return to the third party investor. This paper takes Haikou underground comprehensive pipe corridor project as a case to analyze its investment return. This paper first analyzes the construction and operation stages of the integrated pipe gallery project, and then according to the cost and income model of the integrated pipe corridor charging model, The one-off space rental fee and the operating management fee for each municipal pipeline are calculated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：TU990.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王能林;汪小東;張欣;李娟;;BIM技術(shù)在市政綜合管廊建設(shè)運(yùn)營中的應(yīng)用探究[J];建筑施工;2016年10期

2 崔啟明;張宏;韋翔;;城市綜合管廊收費(fèi)定價(jià)模式探討[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年09期

3 王軍;潘梁;陳光;李明;溫修春;;城市地下綜合管廊建設(shè)的困境與對(duì)策分析[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年07期

4 徐梅鳳;;綜合管廊的建設(shè)及運(yùn)營管理模式研究[J];低碳世界;2016年18期

5 王英;;基于直埋成本法的地下綜合管廊入廊費(fèi)定價(jià)機(jī)制[J];中國工程咨詢;2016年06期

6 吳亞平;;科學(xué)設(shè)定PPP項(xiàng)目投資回報(bào)率[J];中國投資;2016年06期

7 王新征;;建設(shè)項(xiàng)目施工期間環(huán)境成本的確定和控制方法[J];南陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

8 王平;;蘇州城市地下綜合管廊的建設(shè)經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年02期

9 于晨龍;張作慧;;國內(nèi)外城市地下綜合管廊的發(fā)展歷程及現(xiàn)狀[J];建設(shè)科技;2015年17期

10 朱建元;王海玲;;政府和社會(huì)資本合作模式的若干思考[J];行政管理改革;2015年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 白勝喜;城市公用管線投資體制及建設(shè)管理模式研究[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 周孝進(jìn);全生命周期理論在政府投資項(xiàng)目成本管理中的應(yīng)用研究[D];安徽理工大學(xué);2016年

2 閆云輝;梭魚灣商務(wù)區(qū)綜合管廊融資模式選擇研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2015年

3 劉曉倩;濟(jì)南市城市地下管線綜合管理研究[D];山東大學(xué);2015年

4 宋定;PPP模式下公共管廊運(yùn)營管理研究[D];北京建筑大學(xué);2014年

5 楊子玉;BIM技術(shù)在設(shè)施管理中的應(yīng)用研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2014年

6 杜雪梅;PPP模式下準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營性城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施項(xiàng)目合作伙伴選擇研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2014年

7 黃樟興;基于數(shù)字化城市管理理論的城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施運(yùn)營管理問題研究[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2014年

8 于笑飛;青島高新區(qū)綜合管廊維護(hù)運(yùn)營管理模式研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2013年

9 張秋玲;公共管廊PPP投融資模式研究[D];北京建筑工程學(xué)院;2012年

10 孫云章;城市地下管線綜合管廊項(xiàng)目建設(shè)中的決策支持研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1866598