【摘要】：運(yùn)用DEA博弈交叉效率模型對(duì)2011年度我國(guó)22家運(yùn)輸型物流企業(yè)進(jìn)行績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià),并通過比較分析得到以下結(jié)論:DEA博弈交叉效率模型考慮了企業(yè)之間存在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的事實(shí),得到的評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果更加準(zhǔn)確可信;我國(guó)運(yùn)輸型物流企業(yè)總體績(jī)效水平較低,且個(gè)體差別較大;不同運(yùn)輸類型的企業(yè)績(jī)效水平無顯著差別;運(yùn)輸型物流企業(yè)的規(guī)模與績(jī)效水平?jīng)]有顯著相關(guān)性。最后根據(jù)評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果,對(duì)我國(guó)運(yùn)輸型物流企業(yè)提出相關(guān)發(fā)展建議。
[Abstract]:Using DEA game cross-efficiency model to evaluate the performance of 22 transport logistics enterprises in China in 2011, and through comparative analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: DEA game cross-efficiency model considers the fact that there is competition between enterprises, and the evaluation results are more accurate and credible; the overall performance level of transport logistics enterprises in China is lower. And individual differences are large; there is no significant difference in the performance level of different types of transport enterprises; the scale of transport logistics enterprises and performance level has no significant correlation. Finally, according to the evaluation results, the relevant development proposals for transport logistics enterprises in China are put forward.
【作者單位】： 貴州大學(xué)管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金(71261003) 貴州省科學(xué)技術(shù)基金(黔科合J字[2011]2101) 貴州大學(xué)研究生創(chuàng)新基金(人文2012008)
【分類號(hào)】：F259.23;F224;F253.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 汪旭暉;徐健;;基于超效率CCR-DEA模型的我國(guó)物流上市公司效率評(píng)價(jià)[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2009年06期

2 史成東;陳菊紅;張雅琪;;物流公司績(jī)效的DEA交叉評(píng)價(jià)[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2010年01期

3 公維潔;《物流企業(yè)分類與評(píng)估指標(biāo)》國(guó)家標(biāo)準(zhǔn)實(shí)施[J];鐵道貨運(yùn);2005年07期

4 張寶友;黃祖慶;;我國(guó)物流上市公司的績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2007年08期

5 沈淵;漆世雄;;基于DEA方法的我國(guó)物流上市公司績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)[J];物流技術(shù);2009年08期

6 馬f，

本文編號(hào)：2243539