【摘要】：本文以我國(guó)一線城市的保障性住房政府融資模式為研究對(duì)象，在國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀與相關(guān)理論的指導(dǎo)下，結(jié)合一線城市的住房情況，構(gòu)建了保障性住房政府調(diào)節(jié)性融資模式。以北京市作為一線城市的代表，結(jié)合相關(guān)事實(shí)與數(shù)據(jù)，對(duì)住房平衡基金的效用進(jìn)行定量分析。針對(duì)文章特點(diǎn)，本文采用了文獻(xiàn)查閱和網(wǎng)絡(luò)搜集、定性分析與定量分析、實(shí)證分析等研究方法。 首先，闡述并總結(jié)了國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者關(guān)于住房保障及房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)調(diào)控的相關(guān)研究現(xiàn)狀，并簡(jiǎn)要介紹了與本文一線城市保障性住房政府融資模式研究相關(guān)的概念與理論，為本文奠定理論基礎(chǔ)。 其次，對(duì)我國(guó)一線城市住房情況的現(xiàn)狀與保障性住房現(xiàn)有政府融資渠道進(jìn)行分析。對(duì)商品房領(lǐng)域與保障房領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行分析，發(fā)現(xiàn)一線城市住房領(lǐng)域中的需求失衡與不公問(wèn)題，對(duì)一線城市保障性住房政府融資渠道與執(zhí)行情況進(jìn)行分析后發(fā)現(xiàn)其中的問(wèn)題與成因，，為下文住房平衡基金的提出與保障性住房政府調(diào)節(jié)性融資模式的構(gòu)建做必要的事實(shí)鋪墊。 最后，是本文的核心部分，即保障性住房政府調(diào)節(jié)性融資模式的構(gòu)建與案例分析。從構(gòu)建思想、概念界定、設(shè)置原理與征收標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、效用及優(yōu)勢(shì)等方面對(duì)以住房平衡基金構(gòu)成的保障性住房政府調(diào)節(jié)性融資模式進(jìn)行詳細(xì)闡述。在此基礎(chǔ)上，以北京市為代表，結(jié)合相關(guān)事實(shí)與數(shù)據(jù)，對(duì)住房平衡基金的效用進(jìn)行定量分析，證明其應(yīng)用價(jià)值，并提出完善保障性住房政府調(diào)節(jié)性融資模式的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the government financing mode of affordable housing in first-tier cities of our country as the research object, under the guidance of domestic and foreign research status and related theories, and combines the housing situation of first-tier cities, constructs the government-regulated financing mode of affordable housing. Taking Beijing as the representative of first-tier city, this paper makes a quantitative analysis on the utility of housing balance fund by combining relevant facts and data. According to the characteristics of the article, this paper adopts the methods of literature review and network collection, qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis, empirical analysis and so on. First of all, it describes and summarizes the domestic and foreign scholars on housing security and real estate market regulation and control of the relevant research status, and briefly introduces the first line of urban housing government financing model related to the concept and theory. It lays a theoretical foundation for this paper. Secondly, the paper analyzes the current situation of housing and the existing government financing channels of the indemnificatory housing in our country. Through the analysis of the field of commercial housing and indemnificatory apartment, the author finds out the imbalance and unfairness of demand in the field of housing in first-tier cities, and finds out the problems and causes after analyzing the financing channels and implementation of subsidized housing in first-tier cities. For the following housing balance fund and the construction of affordable housing government regulatory financing model to do the necessary facts. Finally, it is the core part of this paper, that is, the construction and case study of affordable housing government regulatory financing model. From the aspects of construction idea, concept definition, setting principle and levy standard, utility and advantage, this paper elaborates the government regulatory financing mode of affordable housing which is composed of housing balance fund. On this basis, taking Beijing as a representative, combining the relevant facts and data, the utility of the housing balance fund is quantitatively analyzed, its application value is proved, and the countermeasures and suggestions to perfect the government regulatory financing mode of affordable housing are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F299.23;F832.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 莫志宏;;中國(guó)的高房?jī)r(jià)問(wèn)題:基于供求均衡原理的分析[J];北京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

2 鄧大偉;諸大建;;保障性住房提供的強(qiáng)制性指標(biāo)配建模式探討——基于住房的屬性[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2009年01期

3 唐麗芳;賈冬青;孟慶鵬;;用MATLAB實(shí)現(xiàn)灰色預(yù)測(cè)GM(1,1)模型[J];滄州師范�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

4 朱富強(qiáng);;中國(guó)的房?jī)r(jià)問(wèn)題:現(xiàn)狀、問(wèn)題、成因及解決方向——現(xiàn)代社會(huì)是如何偏離“住者有其屋”這一理想的[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2010年03期

5 陳杰;;保障性住房融資亟需擔(dān)保機(jī)制[J];上海國(guó)資;2011年04期

6 ;北京市 建設(shè)三大平臺(tái) 完善住房保障體系[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè);2013年01期

7 顧書桂;;保障性住房融資問(wèn)題仍在土地財(cái)政[J];哈爾濱師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

8 徐松明;陳峰;;英國(guó)住房問(wèn)題求解路徑解析與中國(guó)借鑒[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

9 張玉梅;王子柱;王青;;基于債券視角的保障房融資對(duì)策研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2011年07期

10 余壯雄;林建浩;;誰(shuí)推高了房?jī)r(jià)? 開(kāi)發(fā)商、置業(yè)者還是地方政府[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2010年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 薛志勇;基于預(yù)期理論的房地產(chǎn)宏觀政策效果的影響分析[D];中國(guó)科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王小龍;森林生態(tài)效益補(bǔ)償基金制度研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2411605